Fish and apple sauce already on ice.
Packers win by 6.022x10^23 points.
The Jags offense does so little that it has to be watched with an electron microscope. Some will argue the only movement detected was just measurement error and not indicative of actual results.
posted:
We're going to kick the shit out of these bozos.
Attachments
Images (1)
Benzene; I think you spent too much time in the Chem Lab as a youngster!!
@packerboi posted:Packers once again a very healthy group going into Jax.
Curious about Wyatt. He practiced the whole week and per reports, he looked good. Do they hold him out one more week to face DET? Or play him now..
Corey Ballentine the lone player staying inside as the #Packers head out for Friday practice.
— Dominique Yates (@RealDYates) October 25, 2024
A good sign for the team heading to Jacksonville Sunday. pic.twitter.com/Ta9dKpNwDs
Give him about half of his usual reps to knock the rust off.
Wasn't Avogadro that one legged punter from Platville?
the tell was the Platteville, Miss Spelling
@packerboi posted:Curious about Wyatt. He practiced the whole week and per reports, he looked good. Do they hold him out one more week to face DET? Or play him now?
Rotate him in with limited snap count. Needs to get his game conditioning started before Detroit.
@RoyalWulff posted:Never underestimate another team. I remember the ‘97 season when we were defending Super Bowl champs. We played the Colts, who at that time were the worst team in the league and they beat us. NEVER assume you can get a win easily. JAX may look like a gimme, but I don’t think you can go into a game with that attitude and perform your best.
I remember that Colts game well, I also remember over the last 70 years of watching Packer games the gazillion times we have beat lesser teams. Some were squeakers some were cake walks.
I see no reason for losing to these bottom feeders. Other than in game injuries of course.
@Pikes Peak posted:I see no reason for losing to these bottom feeders. Other than in game injuries of course.
FTFY. Enough with the "trap game" bullshit.
Time to get right....full 60 minute game.... 0 giveaways and 2 takeaways - late TD by Jacksonville cuts the lead from 24 to 16. Pack wins in a laugher
Packers have elevated CB Robert Rochell from the practice squad to the game day roster for the game against the Jaguars Sunday. CB Corey Ballantine remains injured.
I wonder if Eric Stokes is just done 🤷🏻
@Boris posted:FTFY. Enough with the "trap game" bullshit.
Time to get right....full 60 minute game.... 0 giveaways and 2 takeaways - late TD by Jacksonville cuts the lead from 24 to 16. Pack wins in a laugher
Beware of hubris, my friend. The other guys get paid too. I hope you are right but far too often the game we think will be a laugher ends up being a nail biter.
Yeah, except we're going to kick the shit out of these bozos.
@RoyalWulff posted:Beware of hubris, my friend. The other guys get paid too. I hope you are right but far too often the game we think will be a laugher ends up being a nail biter.
Guess you didn't read my post last week.
No hubris.....just a prediction
I was going to predict a Packers win by SQRT(-1) points. But I decided to keep it real.
@Boris posted:T
Ford will probably get signed by the Jets
Or the vikings.......
@Dave in GA posted:Or the vikings.......
https://www.usatoday.com/story...e-squad/75847018007/
He's on the PS 😉
@Fedya posted:Football is a complex game, so they'll win by (i+1) points.
Being a fan of cantor sets, I thought they’d win by Aleph-naught.
@Geaux-Packers posted:Being a fan of cantor sets, I thought they’d win by Aleph-naught.
Attachments
Wow. Benzene started it, but I feel that I'm a bit responsible too. I guess this is what can happen when you disable shame special teams players.
@Benzene posted:I was going to predict a Packers win by SQRT(-1) points. But I decided to keep it real.
I can’t imagine anyone doing that. Something like that is not natural. It’s unreal. Benzene is just being irrational. We used to be able to count on him, but he’s clearly past his prime.
Sorry for being so negative,
@Tdog posted:the tell was the Platteville, Miss Spelling
The tell was the miscapitalization.
@Boris posted:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aleph_number
In cantor sets there are “small” infinite numbers and “larger” infinite numbers.
for example
0,1,2,3,4,5,6 7,8,9…….. is infinite
but so is
0, 1/2, 1, 1 1/2, 2, 2 1/2, 3, 3 1/2, 4…..
but the second series has twice as many elements… so it’s a “bigger” infinite set….
the rational numbers is bigger, the complex numbers are bigger, the real numbers are bigger…
aleph-naught is the smallest infinite number….
@lovepack posted:I Googled it. Still don't know.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aleph_number
Aleph-naught is the “smallest” infinite number.
because some infinities are bigger than others…
Downey, Spader, Gertz, McCarthy. They knew.
And this morning Charles Woodsen warns of a trap game, citing the very game I was talking about, the 2012 game at Lambeau against the Jags. We can’t let our foot off the gas today!