Skip to main content

Rarely do the Packers enter a game as the clearly healthier squad, but that will be the case on Sunday.

The Texans are down their top WR Nico Collins and likely WR Robert Woods, but the real issues for our upcoming opponent are on defense.

Houston will be or likely be down 6 defensive starters; DT Mario Edwards (suspended), DT Folorunso Fatukasi, LB Henry To'oTo'o, LB Azeez Al-Shaair (big loss), CB Kamari Lassiter, and S Jimmie Ward.

I expect the Packer offense to have a productive day both on the ground and through the air.

However, Joe Mixon is a very good RB. Meanwhile, CJ Stroud is an excellent young QB and he still has Diggs and Tank Dell at WR. TE Dalton Schultz has struggled, but the Pack are bottom 5 covering TEs so that will be a matchup worth watching.

If McManus can be a legitimate NFL kicker and the defense does not give up 30+ points (as it has in the 2 losses this season), the Pack should get to 5-2.

Packers look to be much healthier than the Texans for this week.

Regarding Peter's point below, this may be Hafley realizing that Evan Williams needs to stay on the field as DB in whatever package of safeties they can draw up.

Last edited by packerboi
@packerboi posted:

Is this like all of those years Packer fans on us getting Joe Thomas?

I swear to God it took Thomas retiring before some fans let that go lmao.

I'd love to see either of those dudes in a Packer uniform, especially Garrett.

It seems like a year or so ago, there was a sudden proliferation of "websites", that "share insights" on teams, apparently with wild-ass speculation as the root of this "information".
Fansided and Lombardi Ave are two of the worst that come to mind.

Not to say that DMP's link is the same, but at face value, it makes little sense.
I might agree that Garrett would make more sense that Newsome, given the perceived need, but both players? And both players with current or recent injuries?

@packerboi posted:

I'm fucking traumatized from the last year and a half....and that's the best you got MLF?!?!!??

"Find out during the game" WTAF?!

πŸ–•πŸΌπŸ€¬πŸ–•πŸΌ

Why do I feel like the Packers should absolutely destroy this team like 44-10, but I know they're going to play down to their competition and the Texans will play over their heads?

WHY?!?!

Last edited by Boris
@Pakrz posted:

I got GB by 14 in this game.  Houston is 5-1 but take a look at who they've played.  

31 -17 Pack.

True, but same could be said about our Packers.

Both got whooped by MIN, though GB ended up making it close.

HOU beat BUF, GB destroyed ARI.

I'm with you though, I think GB wins by double digits. HOU is missing some key pieces.

@packerboi posted:

IOW, many novena's being said.

@Boris posted:

I'm fucking traumatized from the last year and a half....and that's the best you got MLF?!?!!??

"Find out during the game" WTAF?!

πŸ–•πŸΌπŸ€¬πŸ–•πŸΌ

Why do I feel like the Packers should absolutely destroy this team like 44-10, but I know they're going to play down to their competition and the Texans will play over their heads?

WHY?!?!

Attachments

Images (1)
  • mceclip0

Belichick has always had mad respect for the Packers. No cheating....no pumping in sound to the stadium. No electronically jamming opposing headsets....just line up & play and may the best team win. It's a beautiful thing.....

Moving on.....

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×