Skip to main content

I completely understand why Gerg did what he did.  His skills and numbers will only be expected to decline with age and he already got a ring so why not get the money too?   That being said, Bong is 100% correct in that I don't want to hear anything later about buyers remorse from said player.  Gerg made his choice so he needs to live with it.

Cobb on the other hand is going to have a lot more options and he's still on the upswing and I have a feeling several other contenders like Seattle and New England and Philly would love to add the guy.   Look at how Denver benefitted from Emmanuel Sanders and he's not as good as #18

Someone is going to ante up big time for the guy.   Hope he stays but wouldn't blame him if he bolts for big money to another contender.

If I were Cobb/his agent, I would not look beyond this next contract. Get paid what you can now because there may not be a tomorrow, especially in the Not For Long. I would not sign with NOS, NEP, or DEN. Those QBs are in the decline of their career and while they can still put up numbers in a game here or there, for a WR I'd want consistent success. I'd also want to stay away from a QB who likes to run when his 1st read is not available. Read-option QBs/Teams would not be on my list. I'd look for an offense that has balance but favors the pass and a QB who knows how to get the ball out quick, but also takes care of the ball. Fewer turnovers means more opportunities for everyone on the offense. I'd like a QB who has as many good years ahead of him (potentially) that is equal to or greater than the term of the deal I'm offered (see the Brees, Brady, Manning scenario). Look for a QB/offense that has a proven record or has shown a consistent upward trend.

 

I would not chase just the money, I'd weigh the value of the overall package.

 

 

 

If you're thinking only about money then you need to be thinking both short and long term. NFL players do have a short shelf life and it is smart to assume every contract will be your last, but the next contract has to be on your mind also. Take the best offer made to you, but if you want to cash in twice then I would say take the best offer from a WR friendly team. My point is simply if Carolina (where WRs generally don't do squat) is offering the same dollars as a team like NE (where even mediocre WRs flourish) then long term it's better to go to NE where it's likely you're numbers will stay strong. Obviously if Carolina is offering the moon and GB/NE is offering significantly less then by all means follow the money, but in the long run you may hurt yourself come next contract time. That's all I'm trying to say. Greg Jennings played that way IMO and while his career has died in Minny, ultimately he maximized his value over the long haul by staying in GB with solid deals, putting up numbers, and then cashing in one last time.

Ultimately it's not TT's style to let a young, productive, talented player walk with unproven depth behind him. Cobb will be back.
Originally Posted by Satori:

The problem is that many of the players choose poorly, picking short term over long

The FA contracts are fluff, but the agent convinces them to take the money

Then they get cut because they aren't worth the cash largesse and they end up with less than if they had chosen a winning team with a reasonable salary.

By always choosing the overly fluffy one, they are signing their own death warrant.

That's dum

Cobb does not come across as being stupid enough to take short over long term.. just saying.

seems like a bright kid.

To follow GD's post, I wonder about Jennings as an example.  For instance, there are a lot of guys who sign those 5 year/$45M-type deals where they are cut after two seasons, three at the most.  Hypothetically, that would mean that they'd see about half of that money since there's always a goofy final year that they will never see.  Is that better than signing, say, a 4 year/$30M-type of deal where you actually see the whole contract?  GB's contracts, Peppers excluded, are generally structured that if you're healthy and productive, you'll see the whole deal.  Those fantasy-type UFA contracts?  Not so much.  

I hope I'm wrong, but I think Cobb walks. I don't know how they can rationalize signing him for more money than Jordy Nelson. If he wants more than that, he's gone. That's why TT took Adams, Abbrederis, and Janis in this last draft. He was positioning himself in case Cobb left.

 

I agree with others that say he's perfect for NE, but I don't Belichick will give him a long-term big money contract. I'd be afraid of Seattle, because I think he'd work well with Russell Wilson and wouldn't be pain in the ass like Harvin.

I noticed Seattle locked up Cliff Avril and KJ Wright to 4 year extensions today around $28 million each. It's obvious Seattle's plan is to continue to spend big on defense and keep that unit together as long as possible. Bobby Carpenter (and Russel Wilson) will be next up and cost Seattle big money. 

 

Seattle will continue to be the biggest NFC hurdle for GB for the next 2 years. I don't think now is a good time to let Cobb go anywhere. 

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×