Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

For an up and coming band/artist, ya I could see the benefit of the exposure and what it would do for them.

 

But for established acts who have made millions and their fan base is as set as it ever will be, they'll be giving the one fingered salute to Roger. So that likely means young artists who's audience is 20 something or under and a lot of bitching by fans over 30 wondering why __ and __ and __ aren't playing.

 

Whatever though. I'll be refilling my vodka and getting eating more bacon during the "show" anyways.

We need to get an innernets collection going among all football fans so we can outbid any band that would actually pay these a-holes to play at the SB.  We need to make sure the band really sucks, too.  

 

I would kick a few bucks towards watching Rog eat his own shoes while Eddie and the Vomits played a polka version of Metallica's Breadfan for 20 minutes at halftime.

 

Mark Cuban didn't become a billionaire because he's stupid.  He's going to turn out to be right about what he said.

Most of the audience is not hard core football fans. I read that the halftime show last year had 115 million viewers (more than the game itself). That kind of exposure is worth something to someone.

 

A band would not pay this exactly, I am sure that their management would do this. I am not sure how the NFL would determine the rate that they would pay but there will be people (probably not the bands themselves) that would fall all over themselves to get this gig. I am not sure if it is the kind of person/band that I would like to see play but it will happen.

 

I am not sure if you will see multiple bands/artists playing up there again (3 bands each playing 2 songs). The Red Hot Chili Peppers didn't even technically play the last half time show their song was completely piped in. The band instruments were not even plugged in. I thought that Bruno Mars had a pretty good halftime show last SB actually. Way better than the game (yawn) and the commercials.

 

I am not sure why the NFL had to make an announcement about this instead of just making it part of the process behind the scenes. Now it is a big(ish) deal.

 

Most of the audience is not hard core football fans. I read that the halftime show last year had 115 million viewers (more than the game itself). That kind of exposure is worth something to someone.

 

 

After his SB appearance last year, Bruno Mars (who was in the middle of a tour), sold the naming/promo rights to the remainder of that tour. He made out quite well from his appearance. The difference is this though:

The NFL usually pays for the halftime performers' travel and production expenses, which can run well into the millions. After the show, acts typically see huge boosts in record and ticket sales.

 

The NFL will have a problem with this... they already charge more for halftime ads than in-game ads.

The request reportedly did not go down well with the performers - which have been narrowed down to Rihanna, Katy Perry and Coldplay, according to the sources.

 

 

Last edited by H5
Originally Posted by Goalline:

All part of the act of negotiating big contracts. The NFL have a really valuable product and it is only responsible of them to leverage the damned thing to the hilt. How many of you have seen Coldplay live. You will during the Super Bowl. Greater exposure.

I agree. Coldplay is not touring for their latest release so this is a great opportunity to grow their fanbase.

What I (the voice of every fan) want to see at halftime.

 

Opening....

followed by

 

Followed by

 

 

And to shut it all down

 

 

With Bon Scott (RG can make it happen dammit, he just needs to focus that energy for the good of the people). 

 

That is a show I (the voice of everyfan) would watch instead of peeing, getting nachos, peeing again, and trying to find the damn napkins. 

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×