Skip to main content

Please put all 2015 NFL Draft information related to the Packers in this thread...things like Prospect Meetings, Rumors, Prospect Profiles, Position Needs, Opinions, etc. I thought it might be nice to keep up the rumors and prospect meetings and then compare them to what actually happens. 

 

Confirmed Prospect Meetings:

NFLPA Bowl:

  • Mario Alford, WR, West Virginia

East/West Shrine Game:

  • Dominique Brown, RB, Louisville
  • Malcolm Brown, RB, Texas
  • Tevin McDonald, S, Eastern Washington
  • Justin Coleman, CB, Tennessee

Senior Bowl:

  • Denzel Perryman, ILB, Miami (hotel meeting).
  • Danny Shelton, DT/NT, Washington 
  • T.J. Clemmings, OT, Pittsburgh
  • Carl Davis, DL, Iowa

Combine:

  • Clive Walford, TE, Miami (Fla.)
  • Maxx Williams, TE, Minnesota
  • Jay Ajayi, RB, Boise St.
  • Danny Shelton, DT/NT, Washington
  • Jordan Phillips, NT, Oklahoma
  • Denzel Perryman, ILB, Miami
  • Jalston Fowler, FB, Alabama
  • Tre McBride, WR, William & Mary
  • Justin Hardy, WR, East Carolina
  • Josh Harper, WR, Fresno St.
  • Devin Funchess, WR/TE, Michigan
  • Jalen Strong, WR, Arizona St.
  • Jeff Heuerman, TE, Ohio St.
  • Andrew Donnal, OL, Iowa
  • Jamon Brown, OL, Louisville
  • Jamil Douglas, OL, Arizona St.
  • Mitch Morse, OL, Missouri
  • Bernardrick McKinney, LB, Miss St.
  • Ramik Wilson, LB, Georgia
  • Stephone Anthony, LB, Clemson
  • Jordan Hicks, LB, Texas
  • Bryce Hager, LB, Baylor
  • Marcus Peters, CB, Combine
  • Nick Marshall, QB/CB, Auburn
  • Charles Gaines, CB, Louisville

Rumored Interest:

  • Ty Sambrailo, OT, Colorado St.
  • Garrett Grayson, QB, Colorado St.
  • Philip Dorsett, WR, Miami
Last edited by Grave Digger
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

No complaints of Rodgers, but the rest?

Hawk: Waste of space.

Raji: One good year, a coach-killing tease the rest.

CM3: is a stud, when healthy. He;s not the most durable fellow though.

Bustin: 'Nuf said.

HaHa: Way too early to say either way.

D.Jones: Not very durable and, at best, inconsistent, though deserves another year before "final" judgement.

Perry: More time in the tub than being productive. He flashes once in a while but can't be counted on for anything of substance or consistency.

Sherrod: Maybe injury was the whole story, but contributed nothing really.

Bulaga: Another good player, when healthy, which hasn'r been often enough lately.

 

IF Matthews and Bulaga were durable, it would go a long way in making TT's first-rounders look much better.  

 

Only 30% truly deserve to be starters on a good team, and two of those are somewhat brittle.  We'll see in a couple of years if Dix (I'd bet yes) and Jones (I hope) are added to the group.

Last edited by Herschel
 

Originally Posted by Herschel:

Only 30% truly deserve to be starters on a good team, and two of those are somewhat brittle.  We'll see in a couple of years if Dix (I'd bet yes) and Jones (I hope) are added to the group.

 

This is a beyond stupid statement. The 2014 Packers went 12-4 and just played for the NFCC and of the 10 (1st rounders) player listed, 5 are starters and 2 others are significant contributors. But yes, Only 30% truly deserve to be starters on a good team because the 2014 Packers are not a good team.

 

 

Yeah we are super off topic. No one thinks TT is without faults. The thing some fans forget is that every GM has busts on their resume, every GM has crappy players, every team has gaps that the GM failed on. Packer fans are lucky because we have a GM who has more successes than failures and keeps his team stocked with talent every year. Don't confuse fans being greatful to have a GM as competent as Thompson for fans being nuthuggers or whatever you called. Being overly critical and nitpicking isnt the same as being realistic.

Interesting parallel, however, in that Ted really makes hay in rounds 2 - 5 or so.  Wolf was sort of the same way.  Decent record on first-rounders, but likely because he was always picking late there were some busts there too.  Wolf was absolute money from rounds 3-5 or so.

 

Just draft all Wisconsin guys and get 'er done.

Thompson's a good GM, I don't see anyone saying otherwise, but the major reason for that is his post-first-round work and Rodgers. Buddy Nix wasn't far off when he said 'the difference between a genious and an idiot GM is finding a franchise QB'. Let's face it, Rodgers covers a lot of warts on this team, just like Brady, Brees, Luck, etc. often do.    

Originally Posted by Hungry5:
 

Originally Posted by Herschel:

Only 30% truly deserve to be starters on a good team, and two of those are somewhat brittle.  We'll see in a couple of years if Dix (I'd bet yes) and Jones (I hope) are added to the group.

 

This is a beyond stupid statement. The 2014 Packers went 12-4 and just played for the NFCC and of the 10 (1st rounders) player listed, 5 are starters and 2 others are significant contributors. But yes, Only 30% truly deserve to be starters on a good team because the 2014 Packers are not a good team.

 

 

Now if Mike Sherman had drafted the same players then 70% would be starters on any team. 

Originally Posted by ChilliJon:

2013 Draft.

 

Datone Jones, Eddie Lacy, David Bakhtiari, JC Tretter, Micah Hyde, Josh Boyd

Pretty average draft honestly.  But nothing like this past season.

 

Jones has been a whiff.  Lacy obviously is a beast.  Bakhtiari is a decent LT.. nice pick up for where he was selected.  The other guys have performed well in spots and help shore up the depth for sure.

 

 

Originally Posted by ChilliJon:

2013 Draft.

 

Datone Jones, Eddie Lacy, David Bakhtiari, JC Tretter, Micah Hyde, Josh Boyd

Still a year early to make any "final" grades, IMO, but Lacy's been mostly nails and Bakhtiari despite his limitations has held up as well as could be hoped. Hopefully Jones will find some consistency and better availability in the coming season and Boyd continues to develop in to a solid role player.

Originally Posted by Boris:

Sooo......back on topic.

 

ILB's? Any we can acquire late in the first or 2nd round?

I like Stephone Anthony from Clemson and Amarlo Herrera from Georgia in the third round range, which is probably more where TT would grab one.

 

The guy I really like is Eric Kendricks from UCLA, but I think TT would have to trade to get in a good spot to get him. He covers a crap ton of ground and is good in coverage too.

Last edited by Herschel
The thing we need in an ILB is not just a big guy or a fast guy, it's someone who has the instincts and awareness to get to the ball quickly. Hawk can track the ball, but he has very poor instincts and reacts very slowly. The reason I like Perryman is that he not only is athletic enough to cover a lot of ground, he has great instincts and a great ability to shed OL and take on the ball carrier immediately. He's also very aggressive though sometimes he's over-aggressive and misses tackles because of it. To me he just looks like a very natural football player rather than just a great physical specimen. Des Bishop was not an incredible specimen, but he had a natural feel for the game and had great instincts. I will take a instinctive football player like Bishop, even if they're phsycial measurements aren't impressive, over an elite athlete like Hawk (or at least was) who doesn't have those same instincts every day.

People have gotten really focused on the defense again but when looking at the team as a whole the biggest need area just might be offensive tackle.  The Packers played there with virtually no depth this season.  Tretter was completely overmatched when he stepped in at tackle and I don't see the Packer's trying that again.  Barclay will be back but he's coming off an injury.  The Bulaga situation will have a huge impact on how Thompson approaches this draft.  The Packers will probably take a tackle within the first three rounds regardless because of the lack of depth at the position.  If Bulaga is not resigned, I think it becomes the team's top need.  I can see Thompson being content with resigning either Guion or Raji and picking up some backup at NG off the scrap heap.  They might even try Boyd there just as a backup/rotational player.  Ted could live with Matthews and Barrington at ILB.  But having to choose from Tretter and Barclay to be a starting right tackle?  I don't see it.  If Bulaga leaves then offensive tackle is the team's top need.

I wouldn't exclude OLB by any means either as a high priority. I don't trust Perry will ever live up to his 1st round billing. There is no telling how effective Joe-luis will be assuming he's back in 2015. Mike Neal is just hit and miss.

 

And while I loved CMIII's production the 2nd half of this season, he also disappeared the 1st half of 2015 then bailed out of what was arguably the 2nd most important games of his career the final 2 series of the NFCC.

 

I like the DL a lot going into 2015 (assuming Raji and Guionn split duties and are back).

 

But another young pass rushing 3-4 OLB running to the QB with his hair on fire? Sign me up.

 

 

Last edited by packerboi
Originally Posted by PackerJoe:

People have gotten really focused on the defense again but when looking at the team as a whole the biggest need area just might be offensive tackle.  The Packers played there with virtually no depth this season.  Tretter was completely overmatched when he stepped in at tackle and I don't see the Packer's trying that again.  Barclay will be back but he's coming off an injury.  The Bulaga situation will have a huge impact on how Thompson approaches this draft.  The Packers will probably take a tackle within the first three rounds regardless because of the lack of depth at the position.  If Bulaga is not resigned, I think it becomes the team's top need.  I can see Thompson being content with resigning either Guion or Raji and picking up some backup at NG off the scrap heap.  They might even try Boyd there just as a backup/rotational player.  Ted could live with Matthews and Barrington at ILB.  But having to choose from Tretter and Barclay to be a starting right tackle?  I don't see it.  If Bulaga leaves then offensive tackle is the team's top need.

If Bulaga leaves then yeah, it gets interesting. I think they like Tretter's athleticism and look at him like a poor-man's Flanny, backing up center and LT. That's why I wouldn't be surprised to see TT take a Havenstein late: someone who can play RT or can maul at guard in a pinch to compete with Barclay.

 

Cedric Ogbuehi from Texas A&M is intriguing. He looked like the next stud LT prospect at A&M until tearing his ACL in the bowl game. Were he to fall far enough I could see TT taking him. Andrus Peat is a guy I like a lot, but he'll be gone before Green Bay picks and he's a better fit on the left side if they moved Bakhtiari over. I'm generally not a fan of replacing/moving more than one o-lineman in a season. We saw this year how much continuity matters.   

I donot understand thenumber of complaints aboutTTs draft.  The great(?) Ron Wolf had a very poor record of drafting first rounders!!   But did well in rounds after that.  TT is about the same way and it probably is at least partly due to the fact that he has had to draft late in the rounds since the Pack has had so many decent years.  Unlike some of the earlier years where any type of a win at all was some big surprise.   But too many of the youngsters on this board apparently do not remember those years. 

Originally Posted by Diggr14:
Originally Posted by ChilliJon:

2013 Draft.

 

Datone Jones, Eddie Lacy, David Bakhtiari, JC Tretter, Micah Hyde, Josh Boyd

Pretty average draft honestly.  But nothing like this past season.

 

Jones has been a whiff.  Lacy obviously is a beast.  Bakhtiari is a decent LT.. nice pick up for where he was selected.  The other guys have performed well in spots and help shore up the depth for sure.

 

 

You really are a stupid football **** 

Originally Posted by Pakrz:
Originally Posted by PackFoo:

Couple of decent ILB UFA's this year...Rolando McClain from the Cryboys, and Josh Mauga from KC...he had 103 tackles and only 27.

 

Larry Foote is also available, and though he's 34, he had 89 tackles and 2 sacks. He's an upgrade to who we have.

Jesus ****...[catts] is an upgrade over what we have at MLB.

Disagree....ankles are too skinny

Originally Posted by PackerJoe:

People have gotten really focused on the defense again but when looking at the team as a whole the biggest need area just might be offensive tackle.  The Packers played there with virtually no depth this season.  Tretter was completely overmatched when he stepped in at tackle and I don't see the Packer's trying that again.  Barclay will be back but he's coming off an injury.  The Bulaga situation will have a huge impact on how Thompson approaches this draft.  The Packers will probably take a tackle within the first three rounds regardless because of the lack of depth at the position.  If Bulaga is not resigned, I think it becomes the team's top need.  I can see Thompson being content with resigning either Guion or Raji and picking up some backup at NG off the scrap heap.  They might even try Boyd there just as a backup/rotational player.  Ted could live with Matthews and Barrington at ILB.  But having to choose from Tretter and Barclay to be a starting right tackle?  I don't see it.  If Bulaga leaves then offensive tackle is the team's top need.

 

"Tretter was completely overmatched when he stepped in at tackle."

 

Because Mario Williams made a freakish athletic move and swiped the ball away from #12 as he was getting pushed by?   I don't know what else you could be basing this on besides that single play.

 

I agree we need depth, but ILB continues to be this teams weakness!  

Last edited by BrainDed
From WalterFootball:

One player who has had a mixed Senior Bowl is Iowa defensive tackle Carl Davis. He has displayed a nice skill set with strength, size, and a burst. However, Davis has flunked the team interviews. He has said he didn't work hard in practice at Iowa because he was going against young scout team linemen and he didn't want to risk injury against some overzealous underclassmen. He told teams that he should only play about half the snaps in a game in order to be effective. Teams felt he came across as very arrogant and lazy. Davis is going to need to turn that around before his Combine and pre-draft visit interviews.
Originally Posted by Grave Digger:
From WalterFootball:

One player who has had a mixed Senior Bowl is Iowa defensive tackle Carl Davis. He has displayed a nice skill set with strength, size, and a burst. However, Davis has flunked the team interviews. He has said he didn't work hard in practice at Iowa because he was going against young scout team linemen and he didn't want to risk injury against some overzealous underclassmen. He told teams that he should only play about half the snaps in a game in order to be effective. Teams felt he came across as very arrogant and lazy. Davis is going to need to turn that around before his Combine and pre-draft visit interviews.

From Packers.com

 

 Iowa’s Carl Davis dominated from the first practice through the last. He was athletic and explosive, and Pauline says Davis has the strength to play on the nose and the athleticism to play end in a three-man front. β€œUnstoppable all week. Double-teamed on the last day to slow him down. Second round to late first round,” Pauline said. 

Originally Posted by The Heckler:
Originally Posted by Boris:
Remember it's in Chicago this year.

"Drink heavily" is on the agenda along with that Italian place you recommended.

The place you have to hit is the pizza place downtown called Giodarno's (not sure how that is spelled but if you ask where it is anyone will get you there.  Great pizza

I'm a pizza hater and even I love Giordanos. I know, un-American to hate pizza. That's what happens when you  allow foreigners into your country.

Last edited by "We"-Ka-Bong

I wish I could hear what some of these guys say in meetings. I bet some really ridiculous stuff comes out from both the player and the team (I'm looking at you Jeff Ireland)! That said, I take reports like these with a grain of salt. I'm sure teams love to play games with the media. This could easily be a team at the end of R1 or beginning of R2 trying to shine a negative light on Davis' character so some team thinks twice about picking him.

 

 

I've been leary of Walter Football for some time now. He tends to repeat himself quite a bit, holds his opinions as stone-cold facts, and will crucify teams who don't do EXACTLY what he would do.  Charlie Campbell isn't bad though, as at least he appears to put some thought into his mock drafts. CBS Sports seems to have better overall writers, or at least scouting reports than he does.

Your bread tastes like metal.

 

Another intriguing, "TT-type" guy would be Quinten Rollins from Miami (OH). Guy played hoops and only played football for one season but had seven interceptions and was all-conference at CB. Might be a mid-round guy to add depth to the secondary.

 

Then again, if Tramon Williams is not brought back they could grab a CB early. Hayward is best suited for the slot and lacks outside speed and House (if re-signed) hasn't been consistent or healthy. Goodson is a project at this point.  

I think that's true with a lot of these draft sites. Shawn Zobel is the worst at that, I stopped reading his site. I don't take Walterfootball as Gospel, but I do find they are pretty accurate in terms of draft slot projections...more so than CBS.  CBS guys are much more articulate, but their rankings are kind of ridiculous sometimes and they leave out a lot of lesser known prospects. I've seen guys everyone is predicting as a potential 2nd or 3rd rounder not even be listed as a potential UDFA in their rankings. They kind of pimp whoever is popular IMO. Walterfootball sticks to his guns a little bit, but his site isn't as detailed or well put together. Frank Cooney's NFLDraftScout used to be the best site before CBS bought it. It still exists, but not like it used to be. Draftbreakdown.com has become a really interesting site, not for their analysis, but for their quantity and quality of videos on every prospect. 

Looks to me like if you want a Super Bowl Team draft a lot of Big Ten Players.  

 

With six players on either roster, your Wisconsin Badgers are the most represented college in this year's Super Bowl. No matter which stupid team (and believe me, both teams are stupid) wins the Super Bowl, a Badger will be getting a ring.

Either James White and Jonathan Casillas of the New England Patriots or O'Brien SchofieldRussell WilsonDavid Gilreath and Mike Taylor of the Seattle Seahawkswill see their football dreams come true in two weeks. This will be the second straight year that a Badger is Super Bowl champion, since Russell and the gang did it last year as well.

USC has the second most players, with five, followed by a whole host of schools with four. Included on that list are Alabama (Wisconsin's first opponent of 2015), Illinois, Michigan, Oregon, Rutgers, Stanford, Texas A&M and UCLA. Cal, LSU, Mississippi State, Oklahoma State, Purdue and TCU all have three representatives in the big game.

Continuing its run of dominance over all things football related, the Big Ten  as a conference, has the most players in the big game with 29. The Pac-12 (second place again, fellas) has 27, the SEC has 25, the ACC has 11 and the Big 12 has nine. Notre Dame has two players in the Super Bowl, which is only one more than Florida A&M and Concordia have.

 

http://www.buckys5thquarter.co...new-england-patriots

I hope this is the year that TT is able to find a difference maker at ILB.   CJ Mosley had a very good year and while I think Dix will become a very good player there's no question Mosley would have helped them big time this year. 

I also think that they need to try to find another good corner and DL given the fact Tramon may not be back and Raji will likely not return.

Of course TT could throw us all a curve and select a WR or TE high

That Fanspeak site really bogs down a PC. It's kind of fun though and I'd be happy as heck if it came out like this:

 

R1: Maxx Williams TE Minnesota

R2: Deion Barnes OLB Penn State

R3: Ifo Ekpre-Olomu  CB Oregon

R4: Stephone Anthony ILB Clemson

R5: Mike Hull  ILB  Penn State

R6: Henry Anderson  DE Stanford

R7: Tyrus Thompson OT Oklahoma

 

I think Thompson, Anthiny and Ifo go earlier than that personally, but I went with their board.

Miami ILB Denzel Perryman interview:

Who are some of the teams you've met with thus far at the Senior Bowl? 

"The Raiders, Packers, Broncos, Chiefs, Falcons, Browns, I talked to Tampa Bay. I met with Chip Kelly (Eagles head coach)." 

Are there any teams that you feel have shown more interest in you than others? 

"I've been hearing I'm big on Oakland's board and on Denver's board. Also Green Bay and the Dolphins." 

Pitt OL TJ Clemmings interview:

Who are some of the teams you've met with thus far at the Senior Bowl? 

"I met with the Raiders, Green Bay Packers, Browns, Chiefs, Colts and Dolphins." 

Washington DL Danny Shelton interview:

Who are some of the teams you've met with thus far at the Senior Bowl? 

"Today I have a meeting set up with the Texans. I've met with the Browns, Bears, Packers, Buccaneers, Dolphins. A lot of teams really." 


Do any of those teams stand out as showing the most interest in you? 

"I really don't know. It is all the same kind of meetings just seeing where you're coming from and my background."

Last edited by Grave Digger

Perryman is so interesting.  I thought he was going to go pro after the 2013 season.  I'm not so concerned about the height of interior front seven players in the 3-4, but one has to wonder if Thompson is?  Perryman is 5-10 5/8.  One thing we know is that Thompson hasn't drafted a short defensive back in quite some time now.  Is being under 5-11 too short for a linebacker in Thompson's book?  He did take D.J. Smith but he didn't last very long.

 

Thompson had a long history of only drafting college left tackles and then the Packers would move them around to different spots along the line.  Then he broke tradition last year, drafted a college center and hit the jackpot.  Clemmings started 26 games on offense (was a defensive lineman early in his college career) and all of those starts were at right tackle.  He also fits into more of the lengthy, athletic mode more than the short-armed trench battler that Thompson has picked in the past.  But an intriguing guy who is a good player that still has room to become much better.  He'd be a solid pick at #30.  I think Thompson will view OT as the #1 need if Bulaga leaves. 

 

Five months ago Shelton would have been my favorite pick at #30, but first round nose tackles generally become top half of the first round nose tackles when they total 9 sacks and 16.5 tackles for loss during the season.  Can't blame the Packers for doing their due dilligence on him, but I don't think he'll even be available in a reasonable trade up situation.  I'd love to be wrong about that.

Don't overthink this draft. Green Bay needs an inside middle linebacker. Period. Clay beat the ever living **** out of himself going inside and out. When Hawk had to cover for him everything fell apart. 

 

ILB, ILB, ILB. Don't care about BPA. At all. Determine the best ILB fit. If he's there take him. If he's not and you can trade down for your next best fit, do that. There are 3 really strong ILB picks this year. GB better get one of them. 

 

If Perryman, McKinney, and Kendricks all go before 30 then it's a damn conspiracy to keep Green Bay down. 

 

 

Last edited by ChilliJon

The correct draft strategy is very clear - BAB

 

My Fanspeak draft

1: R1P30 RB MELVIN GORDON WISCONSIN
2: R2P30 DT WARREN HERRING WISCONSIN
3: R3P30 DALLAS LEWALLEN WISCONSIN
4: R4P30 OT ROB HAVENSTEIN WISCONSIN
5: R5P30 TE SAM AMERSON WISCONSIN
6: R6P30 LB DEREK LANDISCH WISCONSIN 
7: R7P30 OG KYLE COSTIGAN WISCONSIN 
Last edited by Timpranillo

The best strategy as our friends from Chicago have shown, is to find your biggest weakness and attack it from multiple angles. Allow them to demonstrate:

 

7: R1P7 QB JAMEIS WINSTON FLORIDA STATE
39: R2P7 QB BRETT HUNDLEY UCLA
71: R3P7 QB BRYCE PETTY BAYLOR
103: R4P7 QB SHANE CARDEN EAST CAROLINA
167: R6P7 QB GARRETT GRAYSON COLORADO STATE
199: R7P7 QB TAYLOR KELLY ARIZONA STATE
I agree about Perryman's height, but I think the success of Chris Borland (who actually is a similar prospect) makes the height debate a little less credible. Thompson seems to put the most stock in attitude/personality so if Perryman passed the interviews then I think he's an option. Unfortunately I think Perryman will continue to rise (ala CJ Mosely and Ryan Shazier) and may not even be available by the time we pick.

As for Tackle, I still think Tretter might be in the back of their minds. I know that many disagree and the Mario Williams strip/sack still lingers, but if Bulaga isn't there I think they look in his direction before they spend a 1st on another Tackle. If Bulaga walks then I think they will draft another Tackle in r4 or r5 and let that player compete with Tretter. If Bulaga stays then I think they look to bolster interior OL depth with a true Guard.

Three more ILB's I really like:

 

TCU ILB Paul Dawson

5'10"/230 lbs.

Like Perryman he's a little on the small side, not an intimidating physical presence, but he is a smart, instinctive LB who reacts quickly. He's too quick for OL to get their hands on him and he flows to the ball really well. I expect him to test well at the combine and I like him to go anywhere from the end of round 2 to the end of round 3. 

 

Central Florida ILB Terrance Plummer

6'1"/235 lbs.

He looks bigger and stronger than 235 lbs., looks like he could easily add another 10 or so pounds. Very good, tough LB with a good nose for the ball. He needs to learn to shed OL a little better, but he reads the play and attacks. Good hitter also, actually he kind of reminded me of Des Bishop...very strong and aggressive player who gets a little over aggressive at times. I expect him to go anywhere from early round 4 to late round 5. 

 

South Florida ILB Reshard Cliett

6'2"/235 lbs.

Very aggressive, rangy athlete who reminds me of DeAndre Levy. He looks to have good instincts and seems to play with a lot of energy. I think definitely will go somewhere in round 4 or round 5.

Last edited by Grave Digger

Kendricks is the guy I really want. He's somewhat akin to a healthy Nick Barnett in that he can be anywhere on the field and hold his own, though Kendricks has more upside as a blitzer. "Isolate the receiver on the ILB" and "Double team up front, screen the edges and make the ILB make the play" would no longer be the standards for attacking the Green Bay defense.

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×