Well we kept all our timeouts.
This Saints offense didn't do jack s*** against the f****** Raiders.
King needs to step up and undercut that, let Sanders go behind you, not enough room to get it to him there.
disappounted by the two atraight useless lobg throws to MVS on that last drive
Crap defense. I've seen this script before but I just can't put my finger on it. Did the Smith brothers decide to take the season off?
Spy or focus on Kamara
Gotta regroup from that. That was a backbreaker to go into halftime.
Fire Capers!
@MichiganPacker2 posted:I think Aaron Jones would be as big an issue.
Too true...
Have faith. Packers are a 2nd half team. 31-27 Pack.
A lot of things needs to change in the second half with the defense.
Florio is an ass hat
Never want to hear the announcer say your defense is built for shootouts
"This Green Bay Packers defense is built to play in shootouts."
— Rob Demovsky (@RobDemovsky) September 28, 2020
Is that @CollinsworthPFF's way of saying they stink?
Rodgers didn't piss away a time out and the Pack is down at the half
coincidence?
Saints CB's are much better than those we saw in first two weeks, we don't really have a good matchup across the board.
They have stopped our run game. I don’t see the receivers getting open. On defense we can’t hold the edge and Kamara is hard to tackle. But except for one punt we have moved the ball with the short stuff and a nice long ball to Lazard. Keke is getting pressure and they have not been getting too many yards from their WR’s.
@lovepack posted:Never want to hear the announcer say your defense is built for shootouts
It's a positive in that it's a way of saying your DBs are decent in coverage and you have good edge rushers.
It's a negative in that it's a way of saying that your interior defense (ILB/DL except for Kenny Clark) is terrible, so you need to get a big lead to have a chance.
@NumberThree posted:A lot of things needs to change in the second half with the defense.
Packer offense scored 1 touchdown. That needs to change.
Jones only has two fewer touches than Karama. Difference is one defense is doing a good job and one isn't.
R E L A X
@FLPACKER posted:Saints CB's are much better than those we saw in first two weeks, we don't really have a good matchup across the board.
With Adams out, we don't have a #1 (or probably even a good #2) WR. Lazard is a good #3 type. He's great in the run game and he'll catch anything near him. He's just not going to get consistent separation.
Our TE production may be the worst in the league.
This game will probably come down to MVS. He should be a guy that gets open consistently. He still lacks consistency.
Did any of the 2020 draft class play a snap in the first half?
- 1.26: QB Jordan Love, Utah State. ...
- 2.62: RB A.J Dillon, Boston College. ...
- 3.94: TE Josiah Deguara, Cincinnati. ...
- 5.175: LB Kamal Martin, Minnesota. ...
- 6.192: OL Jon Runyan Jr., Michigan. ...
- 6.208: C Jake Hanson, Oregon. ...
- 6.209: OL Simon Stepaniak, Indiana.
@michiganjoe posted:Jones only has two fewer touches than Karama. Difference is one defense is doing a good job and one isn't.
Defense are similar in terms of performance. Saints just have more playmakers than the Packers do. Those guys turn FG drives into TD drives.
Again, a wasted play to MVS. That's 3 of their last 4 play calls.
MVS is a one-trick pony... marginal NFL football player at best.
Why the deep passing routes ?
And now Lazard with a rare drop.
3 and out coming JFC
Not the start you’re looking for...
@Pakrz posted:MVS is a one-trick pony... marginal NFL football player at best.
Corey Bradford part 2.
Not a good start.😜😉
Yeah!
well i wuz rong
Lazard is literally the only f'ing WR we have on the field.
Man I wish Lazard could have gotten in.
I like Lazard but my heavens he is slow
13 AGAIN WOW
Lazard reminds me of Antonio Freeman. Not fast, but good routes and hands.