At one time I liked the Stones, Springsteen, Fleetwood Mac, etc... but they sound the same today as they did in the 60's/70's.
ok for one, "meow" is literally my catphrase (see what i did there?) whenever someone says "meow" on fb or something, i respond "HEY! that's MY catphrase" thing 2... i was so depressed at one point in my life that i tried to put myself into a coma by drinking too much water. it involved me watching too much robot chicken, and drinking from 3 full big glasses of water over and over without hardly stopping. i dont think it worked though because i urinated too much. good source of water though! ;D
Henry:
See I have a reason for posting what I did after 4 years of examination instead of repeated pants pissing in every thread over that same span of time. Are you starting to understand now? Of course you don't.
Repeated pants pissing in every threadâĶ
Oh, GMAB. That doesnât apply to me at all. Thatâs just silly.
As to The Norvening, I am not going to drill down any further than the fact that it was a highly critical of the Packers discussion following a win and how such a practice is unanimously skewered by the clique - except for The Norvening, of course.
Itâs a hypocritical double standard.
Henry:
It's ****ing funny, laugh a little and quit wrapping your identity up in this ****.
Now, this I can agree with.
You are right. Better to just ignore the unjust provocations. History testifies that I am just not up to it sometimes.
Over and out.
Looks like it's time for an X4 Beer summit meating.
Just couldn't see him being Elrond after that!
Originally Posted by phaedrus:
As to The Norvening, I am not going to drill down any further than the fact that it was a highly critical of the Packers discussion following a win and how such a practice is unanimously skewered by the clique - except for The Norvening, of course.
Itâs a hypocritical double standard.
I'm not interested in this monkey poop fight, but like your passion for injustice I am passionate about correcting revisionist bull****. You were skewered because you stated, "Objectively, Green Bay lost the game" because they gave up more yards than the Bears, I believe it was. When you were rightly called out for that, you responded by stating that everyone here was a bunch of binary simpletons.
Then you got your ass handed to you for being a dick. It had nothing to do with your actual take - stupid takes get called out all the time and that's just part of the deal. It was your attempt to use said stupidity as some sort of stick with which to beat the unwashed masses that got you in trouble.
Back to your fight. Carry on.
I love how dominant Packer wins bring us all together. 
I completely missed all that. Hell, I don't even read the crap people put in my posts because I don't care.
Whodda thunk criticism might have something to do with being a dip****.
JJSD,
I hope you can appreciate my questioning your perception of things when you start off on the wrong foot.
As I wrote, Green Bay won the game.
Starting off on the wrong foot is telling yourself and everyone else that you're an 'objective' fan. You immediately take any credibility for the forthcoming take and toss it out the window. There is no such thing as an objective fan - read the definitions of the two words. Thinking that you are such a thing, which is akin to thinking you're a purple unicorn, tells anyone that perhaps your perception as you term it isn't what it should be.
"Objectively, Green Bay lost the game" because they gave up more yards than the Bears,
The Bears had more than 400 yards of offense in their 2 losses and less than 280 yards in their 2 wins. Objectively, they are still 2-2.
This was actually a couple of years ago at least. I remember PackerJoe was involved as well, even before he became an expert on pee.
Eddie Lacy â @Lil_Eazy_Ana_42
@TJLang70 I'm just seeing this....u crazy bro haha great job up right I'm right behind ya
Kiel and Voldemort are going halfsies on a bottle.
Stats are for losers and yards is easily the most useless stat that is kept. Yards gained or given up objectively means nothing. Points is the only stat that matters.
JJSD:
Starting off on the wrong foot is telling yourself and everyone else that you're an 'objective' fan.
Well, if I ever did so (and I am unaware I did), I retract.
By the way, you have one hell of a memory - seriously. I say this because I am pretty sure the occasion I referred to included my "binary" comment.
I am going to assume I was a dick, may as well.
BUT, I did think people had a really hard time with my describing some as being too binary! Seriously!
Here is a good later example that has been discussed chronically - the defense.
Binary:
The issue is 100% Capers and 0% personnel.
-or-
the other way around.
Not Binary:
Little bit of both perhaps or 80% Capers, 20% inadequate personnel.
Anyway, I know you get my drift and I confess sometimes thinking some folks are inaccurate and partly because (oh, the HORRORS! 
) they are binary.
Originally Posted by Grave Digger:
Stats are for losers and yards is easily the most useless stat that is kept. Yards gained or given up objectively means nothing. Points is the only stat that matters.
Which is why I was forced to conclude the Seahawks were the better team in the game that included "the catch."
The Vikings had more first downs in the first half than the Packers.
Tru story, bro.
Ponder passed for more yards than Rodgers too.
'Nuther true story bro.
Do you think the Vikings would give up Ponder in a trade for Rodgers?
I think they've just given up.
Every time the Packers blow out the Vikings, I say to myself "surely their fans can't blame the refs after this one." Still batting .000 on that.
Thanks phaedrus. I think I get it now, it's like a Schoolhouse Rock episode.
I can think a poster is insane, AND I can think a poster is not intelligent...damn!
Originally Posted by Brak:
quoting the post above you is dumb
Well, I'm the moron that overlooked factoring in the width of the football field with respect to Rodger's 66 yard pass.
Everyone says dumb things once in a while - sure doesn't mean they ARE dumb!
But what if they're...BINARY!
Originally Posted by phaedrus:
And BK sure as hell didn't get a dander up in "The Norvening."
Because part of his MO is he is a hypocrite.
Rong.
Pisces.
This is therapeutic.
The Pisces part is disturbing though.
You got a problem with fish?
Why would you have anything against Fish:
Abe is dead?!
I felt compelled to refresh the page twice, just to be sure.
Work was good today.........
I'd like to apologize to Wolfpack for lumping him in with the knuckleheads who only appear in game threads to wet their pants.
There's about 10 of 'em, and I'm sorry I put him in with that group.
I meant to add phaedrus. 
