Skip to main content

Originally Posted by antooo:

       
Originally Posted by Pikes Peak:
Originally Posted by The Ref fka Blair Kiel:
But it's not good enough for chickenboy....

Cuqui....as the father of a college-aged daughter, I can assure you, the ogling of college aged girls in bikinis is frowned upon in the Kiel household.
What about out of the household?
Ironically, Tavis Smiley frowns upon it too.

       
You are ironically dead on.

Ironically, all of this talk of Cobb running the Statue of Liberty has me excited about the thought of Peppers playing a little offense two. To bad McCarthy doesn't have the stones.
Last edited by Tavis Smiley
Originally Posted by Goalline:
Originally Posted by Tavis Smiley:
Boring, missionary and cheese pizza are all things that come to mind when I think of you Henry.

Yup, he even whacks off to pictures of his fully clothed lady.

Lola?

I was never worried about this.  I knew he would sign.  I said this before, but I will say it again.  95% of receivers are prima donna money whores.  I'm glad we have two starters in that 5%.  Go Packers!

Radio guy from MPLS tweets:

@DarrenWolfson: Sounds like Bulaga back to #Packers.

Caveat emptor.

 

This is a valid Twitter account, but there are also a couple of fake Twitter accounts claiming BB is coming back to GB on a five-year deal. Will await credible soucing.

Last edited by ilcuqui

Ha I literally just read this blurb on MMQB 45 seconds ago:

 

8. I think the two players incumbent teams are undervaluing are Bryan Bulaga and Julius Thomas. I am surprised Green Bay GM Ted Thompson apparently believes $7 million a year (or so) is too much for Bulaga. You can be sure Bulaga’s agent, Tom Condon, will end up with a higher offer than $7 million a year for Bulaga, the best tackle in free-agency in a weak candidate pool. I get Thompson’s skepticism, after Bulaga has missed half the Green Bay games over the past three years. But he’ll be 26 on opening day, and I’d think a contract with significant incentives could hit the target for Bulaga. 

 

Peter King knows nothing.....as usual

 

Originally Posted by Fedya:
Wasn't McGinn the one who said the week before Rodgers got injured in 2013 that the Packers could go 11-5 without him?

 

So the **** what.  That team on paper with Lacy, the Oline firing should easily be able to operate with a competent QB and pull out a winning season.  Who knew when Rodgers went down he'd take the defense with him.  ****, it's almost like the coaches had no clue what was happening with the personnel on the field.

 

And you're going to cherry pick one take from the guy's entire body of work?  Of course you are because you're smert. 

Originally Posted by Packdog:
Originally Posted by Henry:
 

So Cobb coming out of the backfield on wheelhouse routes

Of course, while trying to score a touchme down. Can always claim the auto-correct gotcha 

 

 

 

I think you better step up to whipping pole with something better then grammar and spelling errors.  A little sore from me rump riding your date?  

Last edited by Henry
If McGinn didn't hide behind "sources" so often then I would respect him more. I don't care that he's negative, it doesn't bother me, what bothers me is that constantly trotting out what "sources" or what "people within the organization" or "someone familiar with the situation" tells him... strikes me as lazy. Sources are fine when you're reporting rumors like many of the beat writers do on Twitter, but when you're writing an opinion piece and the only justification for having that opinion is "sources" keeps the opinion from having any credibility. There are times when he doesn't toss around his magical sources and I enjoy the articles, but far too often I see him use "sources" to prop up his piece. He can do better. It's not just McGinn either, there are so many writers who do it.
Originally Posted by Grave Digger:
If McGinn didn't hide behind "sources" so often then I would respect him more. I don't care that he's negative, it doesn't bother me, what bothers me is that constantly trotting out what "sources" or what "people within the organization" or "someone familiar with the situation" tells him... strikes me as lazy. Sources are fine when you're reporting rumors like many of the beat writers do on Twitter, but when you're writing an opinion piece and the only justification for having that opinion is "sources" keeps the opinion from having any credibility. There are times when he doesn't toss around his magical sources and I enjoy the articles, but far too often I see him use "sources" to prop up his piece. He can do better. It's not just McGinn either, there are so many writers who do it.

 

How many writers do you know that don't have sources or readily reveal sources?  It's Journalism 101.  

 

Plus, I have no doubt he uses "sources" creatively, especially when he's writing a tit twister article but he isn't an idiot like Peter King who just grasps at a name and yammers away like a neurotic nitwit right after a one night stand.

Last edited by Henry

Cobb signed his new deal today. There is a video interview on packers.com.

 

http://www.packers.com/news-an...w&adbpr=35865630

@RobDemovsky: Cobb told packers.com: "I want championships. At the end of the day, I want to win championships. ... I know what I have here."

Great, Randall! (Now call Bulaga.)

Last edited by ilcuqui

Great interview with Cobb.  

 

I originally thought it would be unlikely to keep him in the fold.  I also thought that he plays a position that we've been able to restock pretty easily and if he left it wouldn't be the end of the world.  

 

That said, I'm thrilled to have him back.  Great kid, great attitude, would love to see him perform so well that we have to redo his contract soon.   As someone else said, in hindsight, this is what Thompson does and should have never doubted it.  He drafts and he keep his homegrown talent.  

I don't want him to reveal his sources, I want him to state his opinion without hiding behind sources. I'm okay with a negative or dissenting opinion, but Bob sits on the fence so that if he's wrong he can just say it was bad info from sources. Own your crap opinion if it's crap, we all do it.
Originally Posted by Grave Digger:
If McGinn didn't hide behind "sources" so often then I would respect him more. I don't care that he's negative, it doesn't bother me, what bothers me is that constantly trotting out what "sources" or what "people within the organization" or "someone familiar with the situation" tells him... strikes me as lazy. Sources are fine when you're reporting rumors like many of the beat writers do on Twitter, but when you're writing an opinion piece and the only justification for having that opinion is "sources" keeps the opinion from having any credibility. There are times when he doesn't toss around his magical sources and I enjoy the articles, but far too often I see him use "sources" to prop up his piece. He can do better. It's not just McGinn either, there are so many writers who do it.

If e brings up Deep Throat one more time...

Originally Posted by Grave Digger:
I don't want him to reveal his sources, I want him to state his opinion without hiding behind sources. I'm okay with a negative or dissenting opinion, but Bob sits on the fence so that if he's wrong he can just say it was bad info from sources. Own your crap opinion if it's crap, we all do it.

 

 

Fair enough.  But that sure as hell doesn't put him in the dip**** category with Hodor King.

From the Pro Football HoF website:

 

http://www.profootballhof.com/...r-wins-mccann-award/

Milwaukee Journal Sentinel writer wins McCann Award

(July 15, 2011)

Bob McGinn, a veteran sportswriter for the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, has been named the winner of the 2011 McCann Award. The prestigious award, named after the Hall of Fame’s first director, is given by the Pro Football Writers of America. the McCann Award during the Enshrinees Dinner in Canton, Ohio on Friday, August 5. That event, held on the eve of the 2011 enshrinement, is also where the Class of 2011 enshrinees are presented with their Hall of Fame gold jackets.

"Bob’s credentials and his awards won speak for themselves. Bob always has reveled in the reality that football is an intricate game with dozens of different perspectives on every play. He goes beyond the facts to flesh out those perspectives and get to the core of what really happened on the field and why,” commented Mark Gaughan, president, Pro Football Writers of America. “His analysis always has been first-rate, he is tireless about talking to as many people as possible to gather information, and he has an excellent network of sources.”

"I'm honored and humbled and thrilled," McGinn stated after learning he been named the McCann Award winner. "It's the culmination of my career as an NFL beat writer."

McGinn has covered the Green Bay Packers for 32 straight seasons including 27 as a beat writer. He joined the Milwaukee Journal in August 1991 and the paper merged with the Milwaukee Sentinel in 1995.

- See more at: http://www.profootballhof.com/...sthash.qQwNg0gK.dpuf

Last edited by ilcuqui

“Saturday morning, I told Jimmy to get it done. I was scared,” Cobb admitted. “No lie. I didn’t know if Green Bay had given up on me or what, since we hadn’t heard from them in two weeks, since their last offer. I was nervous. I said, ‘Get it done. Whatever I have to do to get back to Green Bay, just make it happen.’

Excellent piece from Wilde. Really sounds like the only option Cobb was interested in was returning to GB and he was just going through the FA motions. I have to agree with AR- he may go down as one of TT's best draft picks. 

Last edited by michiganjoe

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×