Streaming/Radio links (if for some reason you don't get NBC)
Reddit streaming links (links posted an hour before the game)
WEVR 106.3 FM & 1550 AM if you're in Western Wisconsin and no internet
Rock Report (have a drink first)
Bat signal activated. Expect Bruce Wayne under center.
Packers/Steelers Vegas odds/analysis
Replies sorted oldest to newest
Henry starting the game thread.
We have definitely entered the twilight zone.
I can't remember the last time the Packers were +700 on the M/L - entering early 90's Anthony Dilweg territory.
Steelers trap game?
Brainwashed Boris posted:Henry starting the game thread.
We have definitely entered the twilight zone.
I can't remember the last time the Packers were +700 on the M/L - entering early 90's Anthony Dilweg territory.
That schyt NEVER happened when Scoop ran this place.
Not judging, but just sayinâ.
I remember Scoop!
Hey....Dick ****in Tracy
I've got your joy right here:
Raises hand....âI owned that 45.â
Henry not only started a thread, but a GAME thread!
And it kicks ass, too! Nice job, Hank!
Coin Flippers
As per team tradition, the Packers select game captains each week. Today's captains will be C Corey Linsley
(offense), S Josh Jones (defense) and LB Joe Thomas (special teams).
I found this interesting at Football Outsiders, not 50 Drunks in a Bar.
1. | Case Keenum | MIN | 27/38 | 280 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 196 | 186 | 10 | LARM |
| Keenum is the first starting quarterback this season to play the Rams and not get sacked, and just the second to not throw an interception. Along with opponent adjustments, the lack of negative plays are the biggest reasons he ranks No. 1 this week. He was very good at moving the chains -- on third downs, he went 11-of-13 for 106 yards and eight conversions. That includes eight conversions in ten plays with 7 yards or less to go, and failures with 8, 14, and 32 yards to go. | |||||||||||
Ouch.
26. | Brett Hundley | GB | 22/36 | 239 | 0 | 3 | 6 | -104 | -111 | 6 | BAL |
| We've got a lot of comments this week about guys' performance in the red zone or in opponents' territory. For Hundley, the problems actually started outside the Green Bay 40 -- you know, the other 60 percent of the field. In that range, Hundley went 5-of-11 for 53 yards with one first down, one intentional grounding, one interception, and three sacks. | |||||||||||
27. | Jay Cutler | MIA | 6/12 | 83 | 1 | 3 | 0 | -115 | -112 | -3 | TB |
| Feast or famine for Cutler. Five of his completions resulted in first downs, and the sixth was a 7-yard gain on first-and-10. But half of his incomplete passes were intercepted. The Bucs had six interceptions in their first nine games, and then three in one half thanks to Cutler. | |||||||||||
28. | DeShone Kizer | CLE | 16/32 | 179 | 1 | 2 | 5 | -116 | -119 | 3 | JAC |
| Kizer gets a boost of nearly 100 DYAR due to opponent adjustments and still finishes this low. His first quarter was some serious nightmare fuel: sack, interception, sack, incomplete, incomplete. To be sure, he still had his struggles after that, including sack-fumbles on back-to-back plays in the fourth quarter. On third and fourth downs, he went 4-of-9 for 22 yards with three sacks, two fumbles, and just one conversion. | |||||||||||
29. | Dak Prescott | DAL | 18/31 | 145 | 0 | 3 | 4 | -141 | -147 | 6 | PHI |
| Prescott has now finished next-to-last two weeks in a row with Tyron Smith on the sidelines. Over those two weeks, he has had the NFL's worst passing statistics by more than 100 DYAR. In the red zone against Philadelphia, he went 2-of-5 for 6 yards with no touchdowns, one sack, and one interception. On third and fourth downs, he went 3-of-11 for 25 yards with two conversions, two interceptions, and one sack-fumble which was returned for an Eagles touchdown. | |||||||||||
Dak Prescott = Poor man's Daunte Culpepper. Jay Cutler = Always hilarious.
Timmy! posted:Henry not only started a thread, but a GAME thread!
And it kicks ass, too! Nice job, Hank!
I'm just acting as x4 plumber since I broke the ****ing toilet.
Back from holiday and am genuinely surprised this game did not get flexed to 3:25 p.m. (or Noon).
Given Hundley's Prime Time audience, I thoroughly look forward to how MM will respond to criticism that is sure to follow after the game.
With an over/under of 12, I am taking the over on the number of times Kaep is mentioned by the broadcasters... in the first half.
I'll take the under
Matthews inactive.
Henry posted:Timmy! posted:Henry not only started a thread, but a GAME thread!
And it kicks ass, too! Nice job, Hank!I'm just acting as x4 plumber since I broke the ****ing toilet.
Impressive sight! @rothchris and I both intrigued by @AaronRodgers12 throwing pregame here in Pittsburgh, 54 yards of air on that ball @WBAY pic.twitter.com/JsLQdTFfmW
â Dave Schroeder (@SchroederWBAY) November 26, 2017
A big thanks to MM for sticking with âmy guy.â Even if Rodgers is ready by Week 15 it likely no longer matters so why risk it.
I look for Clay to be out multiple weeks, if not the rest of this season.
It's an annual ritual. 
Next man up...I'm reasonably optimistic that someone can match his 3.5 sacks
In-actives
Green Bay Packers
33 RB
44 CB
52 LB
62 G
77 G/T
88 RB
97 DT
Pittsburgh Steelers
5 QB Joshua Dobbs
19 WR JuJu Smith-Schuster
21 CB Joe Haden
71 OT Matt Feiler
89 TE Vance McDonald
92 LB James Harrison
93 DT Daniel McCullers
GreenBayLA posted:I remember Scoop!
I [cats] remember Scoop too. He was the one who invited me to this forum.
Meow!
Yeah, FU for that, Scoop.
I remember when I was "recruited" to a fan forum too....
Hate to be a downer but I'm not over expecting tonite.
Blair Kiel posted:I remember when I was "recruited" to a fan forum too....
Back Street Boys? 
Blair Kiel posted:Yeah, FU for that, Scoop.
LovefulâĒ.
That was N Sync, and The Artist fka TD.
That is 4 pretty important inactives for the Packers. 
I took the pack and +14. Gives me reason to watch the 4th quarter.
The site say's I've been a member since 2000 but I thought I joined before the year 2000. Perhaps 1998 or 1999. What happened?
catts posted:The site say's I've been a member since 2000 but I thought I joined before the year 2000. Perhaps 1998 or 1999. What happened?
Someone slipped up.
No one cares.
Hungry5 posted:No one cares.
You cared enough to reply.
Absolutely no reason to believe the Packers will win tonight.
So 11-5 is still possible?
Can I get a 3 and out?
I guess that's a no.
Zooked
Zooked.
Always thought directional kickoffs were to pin the returner to the boundary. 40 yard return along the boundary. Maybe Zook plays things differently.
