Skip to main content

OVERVIEW:

Father, Richard Sr., was involved in "The Play" in the 1982 Cal-Stanford game, and currently serves as the special-teams coordinator for the Carolina Panthers. Richard Jr. was a receiver-defensive end who also played basketball as a Massachusetts prep. Recruited as a tight end, committed to Cal and then-head coach Jeff Tedford. Saw very limited action in 2011 (13 games). Started 6-of-11 games played in '12 and caught 20 balls for 288 yards (14.4-yard average) and a touchdown. Did not play against Ohio State (ankle) and played the final three games of the season with torn ligaments in his right foot. Had surgery to repair a torn labrum and sat out '13 spring practice. In the fall, played 11 games and pulled in 39-608-1 (15.6). Injured his left thumb against Arizona, had surgery and did not play against USC.

NFL.COM ANALYSIS:

STRENGTHS:

Good balance and body control. Dependable short-to-intermediate receiver. Can snatch throws off his body and make contested grabs. Has potential as a move blocker. Showed dedication and discipline re-shaping his body as a junior. Coach's son.

WEAKNESSES:

Tight hips. Average speed and suddenness -- dull in/out of breaks and struggles to separate vs. more explosive safeties. Unrefined route runner. Straightlinish after the catch. Started just 11 games in three seasons.

DRAFT PROJECTION:

Rounds 5-6

BOTTOM LINE:

Rodgers' career arc was affected by Cal's coaching turnover, as the former high school receiver was recruited as a tight end by Jeff Tedord's staff and bulked up to 275 pounds as a sophomore when he was out of shape, in part because of a torn labrum and torn foot ligament. As a junior, Rodgers shed 30 pounds and shifted to inside receiver for Sonny Dykes, enabling him to show his more natural "F" tight end skills. Is an unpolished product, but could be a better pro than college player.

CBS.COM STRENGTHS WEAKNESSES

STRENGTHS: Lanky athlete who has proven the ability to manipulate his weight to fit his team's offensive scheme. Very good initial quickness for the position, demonstrating the ability to beat defenders upfield with his burst or to gain the advantage while blocking, including on cut-blocks.

 

Long arms and soft hands. Gathers in passes quickly and secures the football. Good agility and straight-line speed for the position. Good bloodlines. Father is Richard Rodgers, Sr., who is credited for making the call and one of five laterals on "The Play," the famous Cal kick return in 1982 to beat Stanford (and its band). Father now serves as the special teams coordinator for the Carolina Panthers.

 

WEAKNESSES: Lacks the bulk and strength to hold up as an in-line blocker in the NFL. A bit finesse in his play, relying more on his athleticism than physicality. Gets to the second level quickly but rather than latching on to control opponents, Richard extends his arms and stops his feet, allowing defenders to break free easily from his blocks.

 

Possesses the ability to make the incredible catch but will drop the occasional easy pass and struggles in traffic. Only asked to run relatively simple quick out and drag routes in Dykes' offense. Only started 11 of 37 games over his collegiate career.

 

COMPARES TO: Garrett Graham, Houston Texans - Like Graham, Rodgers' value to NFL lies in his sneaky athleticism and soft hands in a Joker or H-back role.

 

--Rob Rang (2/3/14)

PLAYER OVERVIEW

Rodgers typically played at around 275 pounds in former head coach Jeff Tedford's pro-style offense, but showed his commitment to the team by dropping nearly 30 pounds in an effort to fit in as an oversized wide receiver in new coach Sonny Dykes' scheme in 2013.

 

Rodgers was under-utilized in Dykes' offense and offers intriguing upside. While he lacks experience and needs some development, Rodgers could surprise with his production in a Joker or H-back role after earning a mid- or late-round selection.

 

Great ideas rooted in love.(R)

Last edited by Rusty
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Ted said it today, the Packers number one requirement for receivers is that they have great hands.  With Rodgers accuracy Packers receivers do not have to be open by much so the Packers may not value speed as much as other teams.

With this kid the Packers might feel speed is not that critical what  they really value is his soft hands.

He ran a 4.87 at the combine, just like Finley. Latter on I think Finley may of ran a 4.65 at his pro day.

This may be a good pick, the guy is raw just like Finley was when he was draft. He is not as fast (maybe)  a inch shorter but has better hands.

Last edited by turnip blood

I gotta say that I hate this pick. Maybe as a 6th or 7th rounder, but not a 3rd. When in doubt, draft OLman or Dbacks. Can't have enough of them. What you CAN have enough of is big, slow,TEs. I don't understand this at all and would love to hear the rationale for it.

 

Hell, I wish he would have packaged a 3rd & 5th and moved up and got a guy that could help us. They were there earlier in the round. Moving up even 5 slots would have helped.

TOriginally Posted by GBFanForLife:
Originally Posted by BrainDed:

These last two picks are real head scratchers..   I really don't get why he didn't trade back with the standard 3rd and grab these guys in 4th or 5th.

It could be the stroke Ted suffered or possibly he is the GM of an NFL team and you are some guy who posts on X4.

You may be onto something here. 

Originally Posted by turnip blood:

Ted said it today, the Packers number one requirement for receivers is that they have great hands.  With Rodgers accuracy Packers receivers do not have to be open by much so the Packers may not value speed as much as other teams.

With this kid the Packers might feel speed is not that critical what  they really value is his soft hands.

He ran a 4.87 at the combine, just like Finley. Latter on I think Finley may of ran a 4.65 at his pro day.

This may be a good pick, the guy is raw just like Finley was when he was draft. He is not as fast (maybe)  a inch shorter but has better hands.

 

This makes no sense. Because the QB is accurate, he can stock the shelves with slow fat uncoordinated pigs who can barely get open (now seven 6'-plus WRs on the roster who cannot return punts or KOs and a pile of dud TEs and he keeps signing them)? Does not sound like a dynasty strategy to me. Sounds like maybe one Greg Jennings (who could beat the best coverages and get wide open) Lombardi, and maybe no more.

Looks like we have our annual winner.  Every year, Ted drafts a guy that ZOMG MEL KIPER DIDN'T TALK ABOUT HIM MUCH DAMN EWE TED!!!!! 

 

This brings out the 

ilk in droves.

 

I may have to dig up some of the other threads like this from the past, as they are all stupidity personified.  

 

We'll be adding this one to the collection.

 

Carry on!  This is highly entertaining.

Geezus, what does TT have to do it keep the ankle biters quiet?

 

And it almost brings a tear to my eyes when I see Nick Collins in action. I swear to God if his career isn't over we probably win another SB. Wow he was a stud. Don't lose an All Pro, don't lose Finley, don't lose all our number 1s due to injury and it's a completely different story.

 

So STFU.

As for recent Vikings receivers:

 

My type:

 

Percy Harvin - has a SB ring

Jarius Wright - short and fast

Greg Jennings - has a SB ring

 

Their type:

 

Randy Moss - like Calvin Johnson, no ring

Benard Berrian - Fresno State (a lot like Adams)

Devon Aromashodu - slow fat uncoordinated tall pig

Jerome Simpson - has some talent

Stephen Burton - lol

Michael Jenkins - an absolutely horrible WR, and the epitome of the tall WR on which the NFL wastes a large number of roster spots year after year after year

Cordarrelle Patterson - tall and fast, not really my type

Joe Webb - 6'4" and I'm laughing

Sydney Rice - tall and fast, has a ring to which he was not a great contributor - I liked him in the draft

 

 

Originally Posted by turnip blood:

Ted said it today, the Packers number one requirement for receivers is that they have great hands.  With Rodgers accuracy Packers receivers do not have to be open by much so the Packers may not value speed as much as other teams.

With this kid the Packers might feel speed is not that critical what  they really value is his soft hands.

He ran a 4.87 at the combine, just like Finley. Latter on I think Finley may of ran a 4.65 at his pro day.

This may be a good pick, the guy is raw just like Finley was when he was draft. He is not as fast (maybe)  a inch shorter but has better hands.

I spent the morning looking into this guy.  I agree with TB this is a pick based upon his potential and not so much current ability.  Walter Football suggested he would have been a 1st round pick in 2015.  Numerous other sites had him in the next tier after Fiedorowicz.  He left early because of the cluster that currently is Univ. of Cal. football.  He makes some great catches and then drops easy ones, just like Finley.

 

As for worth a 3rd round compensatory pick, I'm still not convinced.  I understand Finley was a 3rd rounder and this guy has similar speed (at least at the combine).  Not sure many people on the scouting internet see it differently.  linky  Because of all of these reasons, I would have understood better if it were 4th or later.  This is a courageous pick. 

 

Sometimes I think Johnny would like an entire team that is 5' 8" to 5' 10" and 160-190 lb.  In an age where fewer than 50% of kickoffs are returned and punters that kick directionally and more that are downed within the 20, I wouldn't spend a pick on a returner at this point.  Joey Jamison was a 5th round pick if I remember correctly.

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×