They were never getting rid of Bahktiari for 2 reasons.
- Cap hit - They couldn't absorb it
- They wanted an All-Pro LT protecting Loves blind side.
Let's see what happens for Sunday. Something tells me Buck Cherry is playing.
" Seneca Lives "
@michiganjoe posted:Meant Walker.
I was thinking Seneca Wallace.
If it's Wallace, it's Taco!
From The Athletic.....
Bakhtiari experienced swelling in his knee preceding Green Bayâs 25-24 loss to the Atlanta Falcons on Sunday, LaFleur said Monday and didnât play. LaFleur said he doesnât believe Bakhtiari would have played even if the game had taken place at Lambeau Field.
Thereâs also the added twist of Eric Bakhtiari, Davidâs older brother, tweeting the popular âFâ around, find outâ meme in response to his brother being announced as inactive on Sunday. That prompted some to infer that Bakhtiariâs own family member was saying the NFL âFâd aroundâ by keeping certain turf fields and âfound outâ that one of the leagueâs star players refused to play on turf. Bakhtiari has been strongly outspoken against any NFL stadiums using turf for quite some time.
LaFleur has said that Bakhtiariâs absence had nothing to do with the field surface in Atlanta.
-----------
Ok, I'm going to believe it for now. (Minor swelling in the knee) Let's see what happens when they play the Vikings, Giants and Detroit later in the year.
Well, I think someone is full of shit. Either itâs MLF for trying to shield Bak from a ton of heat heâd get from the fans and media or Bak or his handlers are full of shit for disclosing the swelling issue.
If it was probable he wasnât going to play why wasnât he listed on the injury report? The Packers sure seemed surprised given how Walker and Yosh were being used.
@Tschmack posted:Well, I think someone is full of shit. Either itâs MLF for trying to shield Bak from a ton of heat heâd get from the fans and media or Bak or his handlers are full of shit for disclosing the swelling issue.
If it was probable he wasnât going to play why wasnât he listed on the injury report? The Packers sure seemed surprised given how Walker and Yosh were being used.
He was listed on the injury report starting last Friday
@Tschmack posted:Well, I think someone is full of shit. Either itâs MLF for trying to shield Bak from a ton of heat heâd get from the fans and media or Bak or his handlers are full of shit for disclosing the swelling issue.
If it was probable he wasnât going to play why wasnât he listed on the injury report? The Packers sure seemed surprised given how Walker and Yosh were being used.
If he had swelling in his knee, that would be apparent within the 1st 24 hours after playing last week. It doesnât make sense his knee was fine from Monday -Friday, then it swells up on him sometime over the weekend. Especially considering he didnât practice all week.
So I would agree that how GB filled in for his absence at LT with rotating players just doesnât add up if the Packers knew he wasnât playing or chances were slim that he would.
Weâre also way past the acute phase of this injury. This is a chronic, years long knee issue the Packers medical staff should have a full grasp now how to move forward with Bakh.
How this went down smells badly of a player who dropped a f bomb on the team and said ððIâm not playing and deal with it.
Need some factual information rather than speculation and conjecture.
@Tschmack posted:Well, I think someone is full of shit. Either itâs MLF for trying to shield Bak from a ton of heat heâd get from the fans and media or Bak or his handlers are full of shit for disclosing the swelling issue.
MLF has mostly shielded players in public from the BS happening behind the scenes, see Rodgers last year. Or Sammy Watkins. When things are going wrong he can be short with reporters.
No idea what's happening but it certainly isn't normal whatever it is.
Iowa cheese playing Bak agent on the internet. Oh boy
@Boris posted:From The Athletic.....
Bakhtiari experienced swelling in his knee preceding Green Bayâs 25-24 loss to the Atlanta Falcons on Sunday, LaFleur said Monday and didnât play. LaFleur said he doesnât believe Bakhtiari would have played even if the game had taken place at Lambeau Field.
Thereâs also the added twist of Eric Bakhtiari, Davidâs older brother, tweeting the popular âFâ around, find outâ meme in response to his brother being announced as inactive on Sunday. That prompted some to infer that Bakhtiariâs own family member was saying the NFL âFâd aroundâ by keeping certain turf fields and âfound outâ that one of the leagueâs star players refused to play on turf. Bakhtiari has been strongly outspoken against any NFL stadiums using turf for quite some time.
LaFleur has said that Bakhtiariâs absence had nothing to do with the field surface in Atlanta.
-----------
Ok, I'm going to believe it for now. (Minor swelling in the knee) Let's see what happens when they play the Vikings, Giants and Detroit later in the year.
Next turf game is on week 12. Lots of turf free games before that.
After intently reading MLF's beautifully groomed eyebrows during his response, I have determined that Bakh was unable to go after donating his Achilles tendon to a Grand Shaman for a Resurrection Ritual earlier in the week.
@Tschmack posted:Iowa cheese playing Bak agent on the internet. Oh boy
Been through many contract negotiations in my line of work, including 1st chair several times, so know a little bit about leverage and how it works in trying to reach agreement
So many of these athletes love to complain endlessly about how they're misconstrued, and then a situation like this comes up and all of a sudden they're radio silent when they could clear everything up in 240 finger taps or less to the same audience they were clamoring to just last week for support in getting the league to switch every field surface to grass.
When you root for a team and a very well paid guy on that team seems content to let his coach squirm while that same coach is going out of his way to protect said player's reputation it's a bad look. 69 has done about **** all except get hurt and complain since the team paid him a massive contract and patiently waited on him to return to form.
How he handles this situation speaks to his character and is going to determine if he's remembered like 88 or like 75. Not that he seems to care (which also tells you something about his character).
I canât even imagine how bad his knee has to be that he barely practices at all, at least thatâs what I thought Iâve read.
I think both Bakh and the Pack are trying to squeeze in what few games he can handle before they part company at the end of this year. Unless thereâs some sort of major improvement in his knee, I doubt he plays beyond this year considering just how miserable itâs got to be for him and also itâs rough on the team to never really know his status week to week.
I donât know heâs probably been playing football for 20 years. Do you not think he knows how to handle injuries and manage the pain?
Most of these guys are wired to do whatever it takes to get on the field and play.
When he makes millions and can't be cut?
@packerboi posted:Weâre also way past the acute phase of this injury. This is a chronic, years long knee issue the Packers medical staff should have a full grasp now how to move forward with Bakh.
How this went down smells badly of a player who dropped a f bomb on the team and said ððIâm not playing and deal with it.
Something to me is totally rotten in this situation. I know his injury and recovery has been brutal but it is almost three years removed from when he first got hurt. It is rotten because either the medial staff doesn't know what they are doing or Bahk is up to some shenanigan's for making a point about turf or is being like a spoiled NBA player making life miserable for the franchise so he can go somewhere else.
I think of a players like Gary and Jenkins who came back less than a year after a knee injury. I don't know if their knee injuries compare at all to Bahk has experienced but that has me leaning towards perhaps this medical staff knows what they are doing.