Because he looks like a girl.
You should tell him that.
MM at the podium post draft, "We view Carl as an outside linebacker".
Looks like he's there for one reason. Get to the QB.
Long hair compensating for short arms.
What other Packers should get hair cuts?
Originally Posted by Green and Gold:
Because he looks like a girl.
You would hit that, wouldn't you?
I don't care where they play this dude... He's supposed to be a crazy bastard on the field and we need more of that.
The newest Packer, fourth-round draft pick Carl Bradford of Arizona State, getting off on the wrong foot with Wisconsin fans. Of last fall's controversial ASU-Wisconsin ending, Bradford says: "Yeah, (the referees) got it correct... I thought he grounded the ball, but it doesn't matter, we still won."
Originally Posted by Green and Gold:
and Dom Compers.
But you don't complain about the dead badger on his head.
quote:Matthews
Sitton
Williams
Jennings
Sitton
Sitton's hair is so unruly he needs two haircuts.
That should be added to all of the Packer helmets. Increased impact protection, plus with the addition of a sensor and a couple of LED's, the eyes could glow red to signal any high g impacts.
I'm still trying to figure out if that's MM in the picture.
That's the guy from "There's Something About Mary", right?
Looks like the Pack just drafter Ogre from Revenge of the Nerds.
Sad story about Bradford losing his dad. Hope he can make it in the NFL.
http://www.jsonline.com/sports...116z1-259004291.html
I like this pick a lot, and think this guy is going to fit in well.
Arm length, shmarm length. He looks to have that elusive, immeasurable "it."
The more I read about this dude the more excited I get about his role in the defense. His college coach thinks he's a rush OLB in the 34 and compared him to Dwight Freeney. Probably a little homerism going on there but I'll take it.
Yah, Freeney was a 4.5 40 guy. This guy looks like he has everything else.
Just make sure Kapernick leaves on a medivac. The rest is gravy.
Kaepernick isn't our problem. Playing good football is our problem.
We kicked their asses for almost 20 years. They got us the last 4 times, with the last game on a last second FG without Clay & Sam Shields PLUS no Finley no Jolly & a very limited James Jones (ribs) & of course no professional Safety.
They're not better than us but they are a good football team that is well coached. They're very beatable & so is Seattle
We're a good football team. It's time to prove it on the field
Still loving this pick, though the homerism side give the favorite nod to Abbrederis.
from Mike Daniels chat on packers.com.... pimping Bradford
Hey Mike, Put your self in the sports reporting role for a minute. Of all the "newbies" name one outstanding drafted and undrafted guy on the "d".
2:15 |
|
The dreaded 91...they should retire that number and never reassign it. Nice knowing you Carl!
Wow, he is quite noticably shorter than Mike Neal.
Neal is strapped to a backboard. That way they can just carry him right to the IR list.
Originally Posted by Herschel:
Wow, he is quite noticably shorter than Mike Neal.
Neal is wearing "lifts"; has been for years.
One Nick Perry may regret the Packers drafting him...
If Perry ends up regretting anything it will be his inability to stay healthy. He's made plays when he's been on the field.
Competition is always a great thing. I hope Bradford pushes him. I hope Perry stays healthy. He's fully capable of a 10 sack season.
Hey if they both work out, get ready for a 3-3-5 alignment - with CM3, Perry, and Bradford. Seriously, who needs mike linebackers now?
Matthews, Perry, Bradford standing up, with Peppers, Daniels, and Datone on the DL. That could be pretty cool in long yardage situations.
Perry will have to outperform Neal. Nice to have more depth.
All Bradford has to do to make the final 53 is be a demon on Special Teams. If he does that his day will come as a more important cog in the defense.
Bradford sure hasn't shown much yet. In danger of not making the 53 .