Skip to main content

Originally Posted by Boris:

Please let me know when the Viking O-Line got "better" than ours? Or when their WR's got better than ours? or their DB's?

 

Ridiculous statements by people/teams with sincere Packer envy problems.

 

Plus they said it themselves, we have the ULTIMATE difference maker & oh BTW...he covers up a lot of flaws.

Well, most receivers would rather play with Pondwater. They don't have to run quite as far.

Originally Posted by Fandame:

So how "good" are the Vikings? They lose to what has proven to be an atrocious SF team, then turn around and beat the winless Kittens and the Chargers, with a good pass rush to make Rivers' and Stafford's lives miserable. According to something in the Strib today, I think it was said by Tarkenton, the Vikes have a better roster than GB. The only difference is that GB has ARodgers. I find that hard to believe, but it's hard to get a good read on this Vikes team...

 

They do not have a better roster than GB. GB, even without Jordy, have more talent all-around on offense. QB, WR, OL all lean heavily in GB's favor. I will say that the Vikes have a better defense..at least in the front 7(probably best in the division) and the better RB.

 

I think the Vikes have a shot to battle for a wildcard berth but GB should be taking the division and battling for HFA

Last edited by CAPackfan
Originally Posted by CAPackfan:
Originally Posted by Fandame:

So how "good" are the Vikings? They lose to what has proven to be an atrocious SF team, then turn around and beat the winless Kittens and the Chargers, with a good pass rush to make Rivers' and Stafford's lives miserable. According to something in the Strib today, I think it was said by Tarkenton, the Vikes have a better roster than GB. The only difference is that GB has ARodgers. I find that hard to believe, but it's hard to get a good read on this Vikes team...

 

They do not have a better roster than GB. GB, even without Jordy, have more talent all-around on offense. QB, WR, OL all lean heavily in GB's favor. I will say that the Vikes have a better defense..at least in the front 7(probably best in the division) and the better RB.

 

I think the Vikes have a shot to battle for a wildcard berth but GB should be taking the division and battling for HFA

They've also gotten a lot of milage out of the Double-A-Gap blitz with Wide-9 End Splits against poor (interior, especially) O-lines and QBs who don't handle the blitz well. That will do them well in a number of games this year and should get them to 8 wins.

Originally Posted by Boris:
FYI....I bet the Cards to win the Super Bowl.

Yes I believe the Cardinals are the Packers biggest obstacle not Seattle.

I'm always impressed with teams that could just beat the living stuffing out of the opponent like the Cards did yesterday.  They destroyed the Bears and now the 49ers.  They certainly are looking like they did last year before Palmer got hurt. 

Carson Palmer has always been a minor disappointment to me, but maybe now he has the right combination of coaching and surrounding talent that he can take the Cards further than he's taken anyone else before.  When I say Palmer's been a minor disappointment, it wasn't all his fault.  That injury he suffered as a young guy did seem to rob him of some pretty good mobilty.  Before that injury he looked like he had the potential to be an elite guy, but took some steps backwards after he got hurt.

 

If he's got things figured out under Arians, then I agree, they will be a force to be reckoned with.

 

 

 

 

 

Didn't see this posted any where: Cam Newton needs to shut up.  This served absolutely no purposes, as this was always going to be a he said/he said case.  

 

Very curious to see what kind of repercussions this has on Cam.  Personal fouls are judgement calls and issues with consistency already exist, so would be very easy for officials to favor the defense when it comes to Cam.  You can’t prove a conspiracy as long as it’s just a little head nod to every crew officiating a Panthers game.  Just very stupid for Cam to publicly call out an official as a liar when you can’t prove it.  If he really had an issue, bring it up privately.  

Originally Posted by fightphoe93:

       
Originally Posted by Boris:
FYI....I bet the Cards to win the Super Bowl.

Yes I believe the Cardinals are the Packers biggest obstacle not Seattle.

I'm always impressed with teams that could just beat the living stuffing out of the opponent like the Cards did yesterday.  They destroyed the Bears and now the 49ers.  They certainly are looking like they did last year before Palmer got hurt. 

Carson Palmer has always been a minor disappointment to me, but maybe now he has the right combination of coaching and surrounding talent that he can take the Cards further than he's taken anyone else before.  When I say Palmer's been a minor disappointment, it wasn't all his fault.  That injury he suffered as a young guy did seem to rob him of some pretty good mobilty.  Before that injury he looked like he had the potential to be an elite guy, but took some steps backwards after he got hurt.

 

If he's got things figured out under Arians, then I agree, they will be a force to be reckoned with.

 

 

 

 

 


       


The Cards beat the Saints, Bears and Niners. I'm not buying their stuff, yet. They are certainly going in the right direction. Their HC Arians is one I really respect. The David Johnson pick was huge. I wanted him to be a Packer. Their secondary is very good with a solid DL. I just think they need to prove a bit more against better opponents.
Originally Posted by Boris:

       
The didn't just "beat" the Bears, Saints & Niners. They destroyed all 3.

Right now, the Cardinals are better than every team in AFC & NFC with the possible exception of 1. They're no fluke.

Injuries can change everything quickly. We shall see...

       


Oh, dude! The Packers would have destroyed all 3 of those teams straight out of the gate too. And CHI had lost Cutler to his vaginal strain. AZ had SF at home as well.

I like them, a lot. Just think they have not been tested on the same level as GB.

It could've, and probably should've, been the Cards playing for the NFCC last year (vs the Pack, 'natch). If not for Palmer getting hurt...

It looks as if they picked right back up where they were last year before his injury, and are maybe even playing better so far. Their defense is still plenty stout, and they don't have a lot of holes, other than depth.

 

Rivers is pretty good but he has an O-line that is a turnstyle- different guys in different spots every week. The injury bug has killed them

No Antonio Gates either...but when the Chargers come to Lambeau in a few weeks they will be starting a kicker named Lambo. I don't think we've ever had a Lambo at Lambeau before

 

Last edited by Satori

I'm with you, Tdog. Rivers can be an obnoxious leader who tries to make the rest of the team adjust to him; he's a guy who has had to have receivers/TEs who are big and can out-muscle DBs because Rivers is not quite accurate enough to throw to a precise spot; and he's never consistently carried his team. He's a guy who you love for his competitiveness but like Jim Harbaugh, a little goes a long way.

Originally Posted by Satori:

Rivers is pretty good but he has an O-line that is a turnstyle- different guys in different spots every week. The injury bug has killed them

No Antonio Gates either...but when the Chargers come to Lambeau in a few weeks they will be starting a kicker named Lambo. I don't think we've ever had a Lambo at Lambeau before

 

The Seahawks brought a part owner of the Packers to represent them.  Didn't work out so well for them. 

Agree on Rivers.  I'd always thought he was overrated because media types always put him firmly at the top of the non-elite QBs*.  For whatever reason, there's always an excuse for Rivers; injuries, coaching, lack of talent around him, etc.  Just odd b/c no other QB gets the that kind of treatment.  

 

*And to clarify my 'elite QB' definition......it's actually pretty simple: by starting 16 games, his team is almost guaranteed to make the playoffs.  In the last 10 years, only Manning, Brady, Brees and Rodgers qualify.  Those guys all consistently carried poor defenses, WRs, running games, and/or o-lines to make the playoffs just about every year.  If you can't do that to make the playoffs year in/out, you're not elite.  Notice it doesn't include playoff success; playoff success relies so much more on the team than regular season does. 

Manning still has it mentally, but his arm fails him more often these days. Brees is probably heading in that same direction with this current injury being the beginning of the end. I watch Brady play and he looks elite, but then I wonder how much information has been given to him before the snap with regards to the defensive play call. 

Originally Posted by Hungry5:

Oh, and Rivers... too erratic.

He's a strange cat. Super religious; but also quite volatile on the field

He just yells "gosh darn it" instead of "****ing mutha****ers"

 

Here's an excerpt from the local paper talking about his OL which offers insight on some of his erratic-ness.

 

"What is happening with the Chargers this year, them having already played a league-high eight offensive lineman for at least 35 snaps, is simply a continuation of an epidemic that dates back to the middle of the 2011 season.

No quarterback in the NFL has played behind more offensive linemen the past five years than the Rivers. This past Sunday, Kenny Wiggins became the 33rd man to play on the offensive line for the Chargers since the start of the 2011 season."

 

Every week a different line-up and one game he had (3) different centers over 4 quarters. He's not elite, but some of the issues are outside his control

Originally Posted by Hungry5:

Manning still has it mentally, but his arm fails him more often these days. Brees is probably heading in that same direction with this current injury being the beginning of the end. I watch Brady play and he looks elite, but then I wonder how much information has been given to him before the snap with regards to the defensive play call. 

do you mean he has better coaching or are we still maintaining the debunked narrative that Patriots cheat somehow?

Debunked? 

 

2007 -

During the first half of the New England Patriots' game against the New York Jets at Giants Stadium, a 26-year-old Patriots video assistant named Matt Estrella had been caught on the sideline, illegally videotaping Jets coaches' defensive signals, beginning the scandal known as Spygate.

 

April 1, 2008

NFL commissioner convened an emergency session of the league's spring meeting... Behind closed doors, Goodell addressed what he called "the elephant in the room" and, according to sources at the meeting, turned over the floor to Robert Kraft. Then 66, the billionaire Patriots owner stood and apologized for the damage his team had done to the league and the public's confidence in pro football. Kraft talked about the deep respect he had for his 31 fellow owners and their shared interest in protecting the NFL's shield. Witnesses would later say Kraft's remarks were heartfelt, his demeanor chastened. For a moment, he seemed to well up.

 

This next part cracks me up.

Then the Patriots' coach, Bill Belichick, the cheating program's mastermind, spoke. He said he had merely misinterpreted a league rule, explaining that he thought it was legal to videotape opposing teams' signals as long as the material wasn't used in real time. Few in the room bought it. Belichick said he had made a mistake -- "my mistake."

 

There's more, just read the ESPN OTL article here. The ESPN investigation goes back to Belichick's first year.

 

IN AUGUST 2000, before a Patriots preseason game against the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, Jimmy Dee, the head of New England's video department, approached one of his charges, Matt Walsh, with a strange assignment: He wanted Walsh to film the Bucs' offensive and defensive signals, the arm waving and hand folding that team coaches use to communicate plays and formations to the men on the field. 

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×