No. This was AR's legacy being created with the two hail mary's on that drive. Going for 2, you line up with everyone wondering which WR it's going to, and let AR sneak it in to finish what he started. He either makes it or he doesn't.
YATittle posted:I would've targeted Abby, not Janis.
Tells us all we need to know why kicking was the right decision.
Hungry5 posted:YATittle posted:I would've targeted Abby, not Janis.
Tells us all we need to know why kicking was the right decision.
He only drops the first pass thrown to him in every game. And he was money on the Washington PAT.
throw it deep to Sterling. favre did.
Tdog posted:throw it deep to Sterling. favre did.
2 yds to Sterling, the rest was always YAC.
Hungry5 posted:"This isn't fantasy football." - Ted Thompson
Hackman has retired.
Hackman did lay the wood to Cloris Leachman something fierce.
That's like going for .5
Crickets. In honor of Bart, let's get to 15...
WWMT. (Wonder what McGinn thinks).
dammit YA, I was so hoping the Cloris Leachman comment would be the last word in this thread - seemed so appropriate. 
but I guess, let it grow
I was serious about McGinn, but I don't read him often enough to know if he ever commented on it.
I'm still rewatching the game, we currently have a 13-10 lead after fool Raji had his idiotic penalty to put them in field goal range and Shields dropped another sure INT. Now we know why he washed out as a WR
Really, after all the posters who said yes you say no? Really?
Maybe the packers should go for 2 after every touchdown. That way we can avoid these 14 page threads. As far as that goes, they should never punt either.
and forget those long boring kickoffs - onside that puppy every time!
Clear as mud.
I understand both sides. I thought tie it up. Others thought otherwise. Our D was playing pretty dang good and thoughts of another INT were floating in my mind. You're damned if you do, damned if you don't. How many pages can we really go on about it?
I may not be sure I'm not unconvinced either. Either I am unsure I'm convinced or I'm not sure I am unsure. 50/50.
I need 9 or 10 more pages of the same arguments before I'd even consider the other side of the equation.
Ask yourself this question: "In what scenario DO you go for 2?" Based on the arguments I've seen against so far, you should NEVER go for 2 for the win instead of 1 for the tie at the end of regulation with 0 seconds left on the clock.
Their offense moved the ball AT WILL the entire 2nd half. I keep hearing the same thing, "Yeah, but we stopped a couple drives with interceptions". Not only that, ours couldn't move the ball for our life the entire second half. Our entire 2nd half offense was 2 hail mary's!!!
Guess what: If your defense is playing GOOD, turnovers aren't your only hope. When your defense is getting knocked around, turnovers ARE your only hope.
You're going to confidently choose overtime over going for 2 and the win because, "hey, I felt pretty good that we might get an interception while they're jamming the ball down our throats in overtime."
Great plan.
I'm totally convinced now... that I'm gonna drink beer like a college fratboy tonite. Hell, I might even go for 2... shots of whiskey.
What Moonbat said fits the Herb Brooks "Miracle" speech line: "Great moments are born of great opportunities." Had they went for two and succeeded, it would've ranked with the Tramon Williams Pick 6 to seal the playoff win over Seattle. Great moment irregardless of what happens next week. Legendary.
I'm hedging a little bit. I'm on the side of going for 2, but only if they get in the endzone. PAT is the right call as long as they can win the coin flip or score a defensive TD.
I don't care how many pages this bad boy goes now. I just learned Tramon Williams had a pick 6 to beat Seattle in the playoffs. Finding out GB won a playoff game I was unaware of is like finding a Benjamin in the jeans pocket on laundry day. Best thread ever.
I was trying to think of the all-time greatest threads. Certainly the one where "FART WILL CHOCK" first appeared was epic. The one where Sarge died. Some after the loss to the Giants in Lambeau in the championship game... AND for me, it's always Eagles Fourth-and-One where we destroyed Mike Sherman forever...
Ted and Mike are going to make the Packers great again, and they'll make Jerry Jones pay for it.
I'm not sure why anyone would rewatch that game. Did they go for 2 this time?
Yes, they went for 2 and didn't make it. Goldie just started a thread asking Should the Packers have goned for 1?
Hungry5 posted:Ted and Mike are going to make the Packers great again, and they'll make Jerry Jones pay for it.
Very Trumpian
I am going to add my 2 cents, the Packers should of went for four.
Hungry5 posted:Yes, they went for 2 and didn't make it. Goldie just started a thread asking Should the Packers have goned for 1?
I'm sure he meant wented for one.
can I just say, I don't appreciate you using my name in vain.... 
