Let's go Seattle. BAAAAAWWWWWKKKK.
Add Reaction
ðŊâĪïļððððĪððđððâïļððŧððŋðĒðĪŠðĪĢâ
ððĪ·ðĨðððĪŊOriginal Post
Replies sorted oldest to newest
Is there anything good about being the 2 seed? Match-up wise?
We could still host the NFC CG as second seed
Al needs some more Ron Popeil spray-on hair product.
Hope the Beast becomes the Beast tonite.
I think GB is likely either going to host SF or NO in the 2nd round depending upon seeding. Pick your poison I guess.
Chongo posted:Al needs some more Ron Popeil spray-on hair product.
And the great thing is this: If he gets a spray can RIGHT NOW, they'll give him a second can ABSOLUTELY FREE!!!
2 seed may be more beneficial, so we's avoid SF till NFC title game.
If SF loses, they go to Philly next week. If SF wins, Seattle goes to Philly.
1 seed plays lowest remaining seed...if we are 1 seed we are likely getting winner of SF/Philly.
Minny or Philly is the preferred initial opponents, correct? Rooting for the situations to make that happen
Not sure what would need to happen, but I'd love a chance to beat Minnesota again this year.
Come on Seattle.
R MaN posted:Come on Seattle.
Gross
Who comes up with these pithy thread titles?
Wilson overthrows his guy... he sucks too.
Blair Kiel posted:Who comes up with these pithy thread titles?
Hush child.
Nice sack!!
Lambeau could learn a thing or two from the 12th Man
Kittle is a bitch
Pakrz posted:Blair Kiel posted:Who comes up with these pithy thread titles?
Hush child.
Goofy name, but the kid is not very pithy.
Kittle is just too fucking good.
Here's the deal...If GB gets the #1 seed, they would play Minny IF the beat Sea in rd 1. if Sea won that game, then the Packers would play the winner of SF/Phi.
If they get the #2 seed...they would play NO(if they beat Minny), if Minny beat NO, they would play the winner of Sea/Phi
Brak posted:Not sure what would need to happen, but I'd love a chance to beat Minnesota again this year.
NFCCG?
GreenNgoldBlood posted:Here's the deal...If GB gets the #1 seed, they would play Minny IF the beat Sea in rd 1. if Sea won that game, then the Packers would play the winner of SF/Phi.
If they get the #2 seed...they would play NO(if they beat Minny), if Minny beat NO, they would play the winner of Sea/Phi
What if they tie tonight?
Pikes Peak posted:What if they tie tonight?
#1 GB
#2 NO
#3 SF
#4 PHI
#5 SEA
#6 MIN
Cue the Fedya Fred Astaire clip.
I still think Deebo would have looked really good in Green & Gold.
Emanuel? Deebo? Both?
I like Sanders, but my pre-draft crush on Deebo has not greatly abated.
Blair Kiel posted:Cue the Fedya Fred Astaire clip.
Niners look like the better team tonight. But then I said the same about the Lions.
Between suspensions to their top WR, injuries to key RB and OL, Seattle is a shadow of the team that beat the Whiners earlier.
Samuel just dropped one, wonder if Jimmy can get over it
Re-thinking the seeding thing... it might just be best to have SF as the #1 overall seed. GB would avoid them until the NFCCG if they both make it.
I'd much rather play NO in the 2nd round at GB than SF.
Pikes Peak posted:Samuel just dropped one, wonder if Jimmy can get over it
Wait... Jimmy G just overthrew one. Might be something to this after all.
We can argue about Rodgers and make snide remarks one way or the other, but what I am getting out of tonight is that San Fran looks awfully good.
Seasucks are no match for the 49ers. Would have loved to get SF at Lambeau, but it doesn't appear to be in the cards.
Least Mode
Hags put up a goose egg in the first half
Pakrz posted:Re-thinking the seeding thing... it might just be best to have SF as the #1 overall seed. GB would avoid them until the NFCCG if they both make it.
I'd much rather play NO in the 2nd round at GB than SF.
They controlled what they could control and get the BYE. Can't control what Seattle or SF does...
But I do agree that if either of those teams would struggle with the elements more it's probably NO. That said, either NO or SF will be very difficult matchups.
Rooting for Seattle makes my body ache.