Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

quote:
Originally posted by Boris:
Jared doesn't have the perceived athletic ability of J-Mike but at least he won't drop the ball


Jared Cook ran a 4.49 at the combine. Finley ran a 4.82, and that was before he tore up his knee.

The perception of Finley being some kind of athletic wonder couldn't be further from the truth. Rodgers makes a lot of receivers look more athletic than they really are.
quote:
Originally posted by Tobin Rote:
The perception of Finley being some kind of athletic wonder couldn't be further from the truth. Rodgers makes a lot of receivers look more athletic than they really are.


I think you're mistaking straight line speed for athleticism. What got everyone excited was his acceleration, his body control and his hands. He also played faster than he timed. He showed, up until his knee injury, that he had the speed to get behind defenses, the awareness to find the soft spot in coverage, the ability to out-jump defenders, and the hands to reign in tough passes. So no the perception of him was not wrong, he was a freak athlete for a TE. I think knee injury has taken him down a lot.
quote:
Originally posted by Grave Digger:
quote:
Originally posted by Tobin Rote:
The perception of Finley being some kind of athletic wonder couldn't be further from the truth. Rodgers makes a lot of receivers look more athletic than they really are.


I think you're mistaking straight line speed for athleticism. What got everyone excited was his acceleration, his body control and his hands. He also played faster than he timed. He showed, up until his knee injury, that he had the speed to get behind defenses, the awareness to find the soft spot in coverage, the ability to out-jump defenders, and the hands to reign in tough passes. So no the perception of him was not wrong, he was a freak athlete for a TE. I think knee injury has taken him down a lot.

No, I'm taking everything into account: size, speed, quickness, and leaping ability. Finley is a good athlete, but was never anything special like many on this board made him out to be. Finley has been fortunate to play in one of the most explosive offenses ever assembled. For years the team has been 4 or 5 deep at wide receiver. That certainly opens things up for Finley down the middle. Then when you consider that he's had #12 throwing him pin point accuracy passes, it's clear that his #s have been inflated.

I can think of atleast 7 TE's that are better athletes than Finley ever was: Rob Gronkowski, Jimmy Graham, Vernon Davis, Jared Cook, Jermaine Gresham, Coby Fleener, and Jordan Cameron. Then there are plenty of other TE's who are at least in the same ballpark athletically to Finley: Martellus Bennett, Brandon Pettigrew, Kyle Rudolph, Greg Olsen, Scott Chandler, Fred Davis, Marcedes Lewis, Kellen Davis, Aaron Hernandez, Dustin Keller, Lance Kendricks, Ben Watson, and probably some others that I'm forgetting.
I'll give you that VDavis, Cook, and Keller are/were better athletes, but none of the other guys you mentioned are better athletes. Most of them equally good, some more athletic in a different way, but not overall just purely better athletes. I think you're discounting his athleticism because you don't like him as a person and/or as a player. I am in the same boat, but that doesn't change the fact that he was a phenomenal athlete. Guys like Gronkowski and Olsen (among others) are much better TEs, but they're not necessarily better athletes than Finley. They're elite athletes in a different way, but Finley had absolutely no ceiling for how good he could have been. The difference between a lot of those players and Finley is up-stairs.

Go watch the Cardinals playoff game in '09 if you want to see what kind of athlete Finley was. No average TE could have carved up a defense like that. Period.
I've seen every Packer game for the last 5 years, I remember the Cardinal game well. The difference between now and then is that he could catch the damn ball. He may have lost a step, but he was never a burner to begin with. If you watch the video FLPacker posted, most of those highlights were of him wide open against zone coverage. Look at the other highlights of him against man to man coverage, he didn't get much separation but he would come down with the ball. That's not the case anymore, if he gets breathed on he drops the ball.
Last edited by "We"-Ka-Bong
quote:
Originally posted by Tobin Rote:
I've seen every Packer game for the last 5 years, I remember the Cardinal game well. The difference between now and then is that he could catch the damn ball. He may have lost a step, but he was never a burner to begin with. If you watch the video FLPacker posted, most of those highlights were of him wide open against zone coverage. Look at the other highlights of him against man to man coverage, he didn't get much separation but he would come down with the ball. That's not the case anymore, if he gets breathed on he drops the ball.


...looks to me like he could: 1) Jump 2) accelerate 3) Keep his balance after catching the ball 4) and catch the ball....none of which he does now. Heck we even lined him up at wide out alot then, which speaks to his athleticism.
But no one is claiming he's still that player Tobin. I don't like the guy personally and I can't wait for him to get gone, but I'm not going to act like he never had tremendous potential at one time. That's the frustrating thing. That player that shredded Arizona, haven't seen him since. And you're right, he was often open in those highlights, but that was the point. It was not that the defense just kept forgetting he was gone, he found the soft spot and attacked it. He had the speed to get there, the awareness to get to the right spot, and the hands to reel it in.
I wouldn't say MOST TEs can. Just because you're tall doesn't mean you can win a jump ball. It takes a degree of body control and hand-eye coordination that not every TE has. Did you see that jump ball he won in that wild game against Pittsburgh in '09? Try and tell me MOST TEs in the NFL could do that. Many could do it, but not most. I'm not saying he was unique or some rare talent, but he had tremendous ability.
quote:
Originally posted by Grave Digger:
But no one is claiming he's still that player Tobin. I don't like the guy personally and I can't wait for him to get gone, but I'm not going to act like he never had tremendous potential at one time. That's the frustrating thing. That player that shredded Arizona, haven't seen him since. And you're right, he was often open in those highlights, but that was the point. It was not that the defense just kept forgetting he was gone, he found the soft spot and attacked it. He had the speed to get there, the awareness to get to the right spot, and the hands to reel it in.


The point we're disagreeing on is the degree to which Finley has declined. You're saying that he has declined in every facet of the game. I'm saying that his athleticism is probably still there, but because he's unable to catch the ball anymore, he's not getting the opportunities to show it like he used to. You might be right that he has lost a stop. Honestly I can't say one way or the other, because half the time the ball gets thrown to him, he drops it. It looks to me like he's still getting open against zone though.

I used to think he had tremendous potential too, but it was because of his hands. Yes he had good athleticism, but that's not what made him great. He used to make circus catches routinely against smothering coverage. He used to be Rodger's safety net, because he would catch the ball even if he was covered.

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×