Skip to main content

We are SO much better on offense when Christian Watson is on the field.  You could see it today.  He stretches the field and makes all the receivers/tight ends better because defenses have to always know  where #9 is.  His speed is a problem for all defenses.  Doubs, Reed and Wicks and Kraft get open underneath when Watson stretches the field.  Watson is a game changer.  The stat ESPN put up last week about Watson averaging  30+ yards on his last ten or so catches  was crazy/unheard of. He can also draw PI penalties on the defense due to his blazing speed.  

I am a big fan of Watson and he's been relatively healthy this year.  We are an elite offense when he is on the field.  Today it seemed like our offense was lost in the first half.  I know the Vikings' D is excellent, but we seem to NOT take shots downfield when CW is out.  Watson has improved and really competes this year on those 50/50 balls.



Here's to SCOOT getting back next week and peaking in the playoffs.



GPG

GPG!

Last edited by Mark Ellison
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

@Boris posted:

I was hoping Bo Melton could make a difference today. They had Bo double covered on the ill-advised shot play Love took on 3rd & 1. Still don't understand that play ðŸĪ·ðŸŧ

Watson is a key receiver in this offense.

He's not a Pro Bowler, but he's their only deep threat. And the combination of his speed and willingness to block is important.

Reed started out hot, looking like he could emerge as the WR1.  Then he disappeared in big games and it looks like Ds have schemed to make that happen.  Wix got more offseason hype than anyone but never really got going.

Last year's fanfare about all the 1-2yr WRs busting out randomly in different games was at least partially due to the "unscouted player" effect.  We didn't see nearly the same type of big games from 5 different guys that we saw last year.  Melton was almost completely MIA.  Opposing teams noticed and adjusted.  Other than Watson and Doubs, who seem to be what they are, the rest of them will be entering the crucial yr 3 of their WR development next season.

It would also be interesting to see what effect Kraft and Musgrave (12 personnel) would have on the WRs and the O in general.

Last edited by DH13

The passing game this year has been inconsistent and does not have an identity.  LaFleur seems to want to feature Jacobs so much that Love can't get in any sort of rhythm early in games.  They went looking for more explosives but the intermediate, especially middle of field, passing game just isn't there.  A lot of screens, short passes and bombs.  I do not understand how Kraft isn't a centerpiece of the passing game.  Brady's commentary about the passing game lacking detail was interesting.  I would like to better understand what he meant by that. 

Deep balls seem impossible to connect without Watson.  His absence may be having that big of an impact.  If it is then they need another guy that is capable of picking up the slack - a separator or another speedster.  Can not let the loss of one guy trash half your game plan when the game plan is supposed to be so "multiple" driven.

@50k Club posted:

The passing game this year has been inconsistent and does not have an identityâ€Ķ. Brady's commentary about the passing game lacking detail was interesting.  I would like to better understand what he meant by that.

Brady’s paid $30m/year to explain it to us!  He can’t- but he’s a pretty face for the women to look at!  Cannot stand him - just rambles with no coherent thought.

Brady’s paid $30m/year to explain it to us!  He can’t- but he’s a pretty face for the women to look at!  Cannot stand him - just rambles with no coherent thought.

My hunch is that he got that from one of the coaches that they have a sit down with leading up to the game. Either MLF, Steno, or Flores, but he didn't really know what they meant by it. Announcers get A LOT of "insights" from these meetings that they pass off as their own.

I said last year that Love can't hit a WR in stride on the long pass attempts, and I still believe this is true today.
Instead of Watson (as an example) being able to catch an arc in front of them, they always have to wait on the ball to arrive or have to work their way back towards Love because it is underthrown.
This creates opportunities for the DBs to contest/defend these passes, and contributes to the drop rate.

Of course, that doesn't explain a WR dropping (or 'muffing') a ball that hits them in the hands, or letting one go right through their hands...

@50k Club posted:

The passing game this year has been inconsistent and does not have an identity.  LaFleur seems to want to feature Jacobs so much that Love can't get in any sort of rhythm early in games.

I think MLF started featuring Jacobs so much partly because he wanted Love to stop throwing dumb ballsâ€Ķ..and it seems to be working.  Also, Jacobs is a stud. Also, imo, they should do what they did at the beginning of the Seahawks game and give it to Jacobs every damn play until the defense proves they can stop him.

Rushing is smart football.

The fact that the number of drops assigned to any receiver over the course of a season tends to be a single digit is about as deep as you need to go here.

If you or I graded drops we would not be nearly as kind.

From ESPN:

This standard says drops are "incomplete passes where the receiver SHOULD have caught the pass with ORDINARY effort."

Basically, we're talking about blatant drops, not the ones where your old man leans over and says anything that grazed the receiver anywhere was a drop in his day.

"Only use this if the receiver is 100 percent at fault and no one else can be blamed for the incompletion," ESPN tells its game charters. "Pass interference that wasn't called/passes thrown just outside the receiver's reach, etc., are NOT drops."

Last edited by PackerHawk

This thread about drops has ground my gears over 2016 all over again.
Peak Rodgers. Peak Jordy. Peak Adams. Peak Cobb. Insane reception to target rate. Combined 31 TD’s. These 3 caught everything.
And somehow MM shit dragged the team to a 10-6 record and eventually routed by Atlanta in the title game.
Evidence #1 MM should never head coach a team again and should have been fired 5 minutes after that loss.

@ChilliJon posted:

This thread about drops has ground my gears over 2016 all over again.
Peak Rodgers. Peak Jordy. Peak Adams. Peak Cobb. Insane reception to target rate. Combined 31 TD’s. These 3 caught everything.
And somehow MM shit dragged the team to a 10-6 record and eventually routed by Atlanta in the title game.
Evidence #1 MM should never head coach a team again and should have been fired 5 minutes after that loss.

Wasn’t the Seattle debacle before that?  He should not have been on the return flight that evening.

@ChilliJon posted:

This thread about drops has ground my gears over 2016 all over again.
Peak Rodgers. Peak Jordy. Peak Adams. Peak Cobb. Insane reception to target rate. Combined 31 TD’s. These 3 caught everything.
And somehow MM shit dragged the team to a 10-6 record and eventually routed by Atlanta in the title game.
Evidence #1 MM should never head coach a team again and should have been fired 5 minutes after that loss.

I may be using 'selective memory', but I remember that season as one where the defense, generally, and the DBs, especially, were riddled with injuries. They literally ran out of players at at least one position, and had street FAs trying to fill in.
It was a foregone conclusion that they would get wiped in the playoffs, and boy, did they....

@mrtundra posted:

Any word on what the extent of Watson's injury, from the Bears game, is?

While it's probable Watson's injury is an ACL, the absolute glass half full on this would be that usually that is leaked by now from Tom Pellisero/Ian Rapport/Adam Schefter. And so far, nothing being reported.

There are also tests for an ACL tear that are done prior to an MRI that are fairly telling if that's the injury. Also that has not been reported yet.

So best possible news is it's an MCL, bruise or some other injury that would mean he would be good to go for TC in 2025.

But just like Jaire, Gute cannot bank on a healthy Watson moving forward. Whether it's this kind of injury, the hamstrings,  or ______, he can't stay healthy when he's counted on the most.

It's a good draft for WR's this year. Gotta find a burner that Love can rely on. And if by some miracle Watson stays healthy in '25, then it's just gravy.

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×