WHEW!!!!! 
Are you denying that Lynch wouldn't have been an improvement over BJax? If so, can you prove it?
Prove he would have been an improvement. You're making the claim that it's undeniable. Burden of proof is on you.
quote:Originally posted by Blair Kiel:quote:Originally posted by PDXPackFan:
lol... trolling again i see
Yeah, I'm a troll. Happily trolling here for 9 years.
And you're a whiny tool.
Guess which statement is correct?
A:That you're a troll....
That was too easy
quote:Originally posted by PackerRick:
Are you denying that Lynch wouldn't have been an improvement over BJax? If so, can you prove it?
Yes jackass. It's called knowing the system and being able to protect, having the same production as Capt. Caveman and not costing a 3rd round pick.
Don't let the facts drill you in the ass like your anal intruder.
BTW, I personally don't have a problem with you Rick but jeebus, let this nag go free.
quote:Originally posted by FarmDog:
Good win, erase the 4th and 26th.
Funny how every time the Packers play in Philly, they have to bring up 4th and 26, and yet they never mention the duck that Brent threw up in overtime of that game.
quote:Originally posted by bdplant:quote:Originally posted by FarmDog:
Good win, erase the 4th and 26th.
Funny how every time the Packers play in Philly, they have to bring up 4th and 26, and yet they never mention the duck that Brent threw up in overtime.
I was thinking the same thing...
quote:Originally posted by CAPackFan95:
Prove he would have been an improvement. You're making the claim that it's undeniable. Burden of proof is on you.
LOL. Don't hold your breath.
Rick, isn't there a hot stove league situation you can stupidly comment on?
quote:Originally posted by CUPackFan:quote:Originally posted by bdplant:quote:Originally posted by FarmDog:
Good win, erase the 4th and 26th.
Funny how every time the Packers play in Philly, they have to bring up 4th and 26, and yet they never mention the duck that Brent threw up in overtime.
I was thinking the same thing...
Stay in denial.
quote:Originally posted by Henry:quote:Originally posted by PackerRick:
Are you denying that Lynch wouldn't have been an improvement over BJax? If so, can you prove it?
Yes jackass. It's called knowing the system and being able to protect, having the same production as Capt. Caveman and not costing a 3rd round pick.
Don't let the facts drill you in the ass like your anal intruder.
You don't have to make a stupid comment like that, we already know you're dumber than a stump.
You have no proof that the Packers wouldn't have been improved with Lynch and today we saw what we probably could have seen all season. A true RB running between the tackles and BJax filling his role as a 3rd down back.
Forget the 3rd round pick cop out. That pick has no impact on the Packers current season.
quote:Originally posted by PackerRick:
You have no proof that the Packers wouldn't have been improved with Lynch and today we saw what we probably could have seen all season. A true RB running between the tackles and BJax filling his role as a 3rd down back.
And your undeniable proof that Lynch was a major upgrade is where exactly?
Is that part of the 1998 SFG study, or is that part of turkey carving study?
Geez, some people just can't let things go. Our team won a road playoff game, Starks played great football against a good run defense and we're talking about Marshawn Lynch. Incredible.
quote:Originally posted by PackerRick:
Are you denying that Lynch wouldn't have been an improvement over BJax? If so, can you prove it?
Thompson didn't trade for him. So he couldn't be an improvement and ipso-fatso, he wouldn't have been an improvement. Proof.
quote:Originally posted by CAPackFan95:quote:Originally posted by PackerRick:
You have no proof that the Packers wouldn't have been improved with Lynch and today we saw what we probably could have seen all season. A true RB running between the tackles and BJax filling his role as a 3rd down back.
And your undeniable proof that Lynch was a major upgrade is where exactly?
Is that part of the 1998 SFG study, or is that part of turkey carving study?
Maybe it's that study where you thought a spread offense was only when a team went 4+ WRs.
quote:Originally posted by Pack-Man:
Geez, some people just can't let things go. Our team won a road playoff game, Starks played great football against a good run defense and we're talking about Marshawn Lynch. Incredible.
Here's where it started.
quote:Originally posted by Henry:
"Lynch would've made this a better team. A third pick means nothing to me"
NAME THAT DUMBASS!!!!!
quote:SI_PeterKing (via twitter):
Just talked to Tramon Williams. Said he didn't think the pick was that difficult. I begged to differ. "I'm NOT missing that pick,'' he said.
quote:Originally posted by PackerRick:
You don't have to make a stupid comment like that, we already know you're dumber than a stump.
You have no proof that the Packers wouldn't have been improved with Lynch and today we saw what we probably could have seen all season. A true RB running between the tackles and BJax filling his role as a 3rd down back.
Forget the 3rd round pick cop out. That pick has no impact on the Packers current season.
REALLY! REALLY! DID I JUST FALL INTO A ROOM FULL OF PEE WEE HERMAN IMPERSONATORS SCREAMING "I KNOW WHAT YOU ARE BUT WHAT AM I"?!?
Rick, with that single comment alone you have entered the realm of the extremely inebriated or the "I'm legally obligated to wear a hockey helmet".
Wait for it. 180 BIG GUY!! What's your proof?
Dude! Where's my third round pick!?
quote:Originally posted by CAPackFan95:
No reason to put that out there. Based on how you post that was already evident.
quote:Originally posted by PackerRick:
Henry, I think you're the drunk.
Dude, where's my liver!!!
quote:Originally posted by Red Dawn:
Win or lose, X4 has the coolest fights.
If you're into monkey poop, I guess.
Cap, I'm not going to open that but I bet it's funny.
quote:Originally posted by Henry:
WIN!!!
21-16. Did you just return to reality.
quote:Originally posted by PackerRick:
Cap, I'm not going to open that but I bet it's funny.
Henry, it was a great play and it couldn't have come at a more crucial time.
THANK YOU TRAMON WILLIAMS! Seems more than not the Packers are on the bad end of these type games with some BS play at the very end. Pittsburgh, Atlanta, Arizona, Bears, and that's just the last couple of years.
That was an amazing catch he made. How many times do you see the DB catch that and then land and the ball comes loose?
That was an amazing catch he made. How many times do you see the DB catch that and then land and the ball comes loose?
quote:Originally posted by Red Dawn:
D. Jackson is a media whore, hugging AR during an interview.
Not sure if he's a media whore or not, but he and AR are friends and fellow Cal alumnus so I think he just came over to give him 'good game' props
I'm just happy that will be the last time we ever see him or any other DB on the roster right now come out of the endzone on a game clinching interception. When they go over that game tape the point should be made very clear. Glad he's excited to make a great play but that's inviting an all time blunder.