Skip to main content

Rodgers, through 2017, is:

10th all time in passing TDs and 20th in yards - everyone ahead of him played nearly 2x as many games. These are longevity stats and it he plays 17-20 years, he'll finish top 5 in both based on his 10 year average as a starter.

Some other stats to consider:

1st in passer rating

1st in TD:Int

t-5th in yards per attempt

All of these show efficiency and consistency, not related to longevity.

Brown Paper Sack posted:
Hungry5 posted:

Anyone with even a rudimentary understanding of American football recognize Rodgers as the best.

Hell, 50 Irish drunks (that's redundant) can see that.

This is just a small sampling from what you'll find on the internet outside the reclusive hermit kingdom of Green Bay:

This is the most intellectually dishonest and poorly conceived graph I've ever seen.

These "ranks" that he uses to then calculate an average? Notice how NO ONE is less than 10th? That's because these aren't ranking vs every other QB to ever play in the NFL. This moronic author picked 10 guys, and then compared these numbers vs the others in that 10.  

I MEAN JESUS TAPDANCING CHRIST ON A CRACKER. 

This isn't some mathematical formula and these 10 rose to the list. He picked 10 guys and then sorted those 10 based on some relevant stats and some insanely stupid things. 

Anyone that uses this graph for more than a joke to mock endlessly must A) Be brain dead, B) Not understand a lick of football, C) Be a Viking fan, or D) All of the above. 

I mean its so stupid, that there's no point in asking questions like

"wait, Brady played 14 seasons to get to 359 TDs, why does it say 11?"

"Brady most certainly does not and never has held the best TD/INT ratio, how is he ranked #1?"

"why would anyone use raw numbers for number of INTs thrown to rate, wouldn't people with brains use INT% to account for the fact that ERAs changed and people threw less early?"

"No one with any brains thinks 4th Q comebacks is a relevant stat, why is it here?"

"what the difference between 4Q comebacks and Game Winning Drives?"

"Pro Bowls? Really? Pro Bowls?"

Last edited by Timpranillo

Trust in Gute.   Doesn’t quite have the same impact as ROTTT but I’m confident Gopher Jr.  will get r done with Rodgers.  

“Waiting to see what Cousins does” = “pay 12 a **** ton of money” 

By the way, I read that QB graph or comparison or whatever the **** it is and I felt the same effect as hitting some kind bud.  Uffda 

Brown Paper Sack posted:
Brainwashed Boris posted:

You post a graphic where Brady has 11 years ONLY under his belt??? 

Try getting into 2018. 

https://www.google.com/search

Have at it.

Hell, almost all of the lists have Favre in the top 10, but no Rodgers.

Well if it isn't Sentient Lump of ****!

You post a an idiotic graphic and then tell Boris to prove your point?  

Deliberate ignorance is running rampant these days but lets not take it to a new level Sentient Lump of ****. 

Last edited by Henry
Henry posted:
Brown Paper Sack posted:
Brainwashed Boris posted:

You post a graphic where Brady has 11 years ONLY under his belt??? 

Try getting into 2018. 

https://www.google.com/search

Have at it.

Hell, almost all of the lists have Favre in the top 10, but no Rodgers.

Well if it isn't Sentient Lump of ****!

You post a an idiotic graphic and then tell Boris to prove your point?  

Deliberate ignorance is running rampant these days but lets not take it to a new level Sentient Lump of ****. 

Hi Harry! Long time no see!

Brown Paper Sack posted:

Look at the spazzing going on here.

And not one of you produced anything to back up the claim that Rodgers is the greatest of all time.

Who said all time?  As for players currently in the NFL and specifically in regards to his contract, it's not even a question you inert fart bubble.  Rodgers career isn't over yet either.  

Do you honestly think Rodgers isn't the best player in the NFL?  Are you such a homer dolt that you can't see that?  Again, all questions posed to you are rhetorical.  I felt a slight moment of charity in explaining that for you you indeterminate cyst.     

Last edited by Henry
Henry posted:
Brown Paper Sack posted:

Look at the spazzing going on here.

And not one of you produced anything to back up the claim that Rodgers is the greatest of all time.

Who said all time?  As for players currently in the NFL and specifically in regards to his contract, it's not even a question you inert fart bubble.  Rodgers career isn't over yet either.  

Do you honestly think Rodgers isn't the best player in the NFL?  Are you such a homer dolt that you can't see that?  Again, all questions posed to you are rhetorical.  I felt a slight moment of charity in explaining that for you you indeterminate cyst.     

Hungry5 did. 

I put Brady above Rodgers as far as QB's still playing.

Great adjectives!

I said it earlier in the thread, Bradshaw wouldn't be in my top 20 of best throwers of the ball. But you cannot deny the fact he has 4 Super Bowls. I deal in facts & reality.

If Rodgers was available, what would the Jets or Cleveland pay him?? (Using these 2 teams as they currently have the most cap space)

What would either of them pay -->> Brady>Big Ben>Eli>bunch of other guys. <<---

Brown Paper Sack posted:
Henry posted:
Brown Paper Sack posted:

Look at the spazzing going on here.

And not one of you produced anything to back up the claim that Rodgers is the greatest of all time.

Who said all time?  As for players currently in the NFL and specifically in regards to his contract, it's not even a question you inert fart bubble.  Rodgers career isn't over yet either.  

Do you honestly think Rodgers isn't the best player in the NFL?  Are you such a homer dolt that you can't see that?  Again, all questions posed to you are rhetorical.  I felt a slight moment of charity in explaining that for you you indeterminate cyst.     

Hungry5 did. 

I put Brady above Rodgers as far as QB's still playing.

Great adjectives!

Take it up with him.  Sentient POS, Why don't you just bottom line it for me when it comes to Rodgers.  Tee that ****er up.  

Eye Heart Green & Gold posted:

And you can’t deny the fact that Brady has won 5x as many SBs as Rodgers, and Ben and Eli 2x.....

Facts and reality.

Yep.  What's the common denominator (other than Belichek)?  Defenses.  I'm not going to say Ben and Eli Dilfered it to SuperBowls because they didn't but the supporting cast was always there.  Brady?  Yeah, Belichek.  

And since this is a thread about Rodgers contract and the reason why he can name his ****ing price is he actually made a horse**** defensive scheme look manageable as they rolled into the playoffs/championship game year after year.  

Then there's this thing called "watching the guy play".  Just like Ben gutting out big plays when the offense needed it.  Or Eli doing whatever the hell it was he'd pull out of his ass at any time. Or Brady executing Belichek's offense efficiently.  You nod and acknowledge it.  

If you can't see the unicorn type magic that Rodgers pulls off with limited supporting cast on the other side of the ball then, well, you are who you are.  That's why Rodgers, in a thread about Rodger's contract, can name his price as the best QB in the NFL.  

Last edited by Henry

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×