Skip to main content

quote:
NFP Sunday Blitz
nationalfootballpost.com


Greg Jennings is a really fine wide receiver, but he may be in for a little bit of a rude awakening on the free agent market. According to a couple of front office men I spoke with, teams might not be throwing fistfuls of cash at this two-time Pro Bowler. Why not? A couple of reasons. First, they believe Jennings won’t produce as much without Aaron Rodgers throwing to him, and without Mike McCarthy drawing up plays for him. And secondly, he is 29 years old. Jennings would have been much better positioned to make a killing if he became free after his first contract. Teams are hesitant to pay big for other team’s wide receivers in their third contracts.
continue
Wonder if those couple of front office men happen to work at 1265. Also wondering if they hope Jennings sees the market for himself and they can get him back at a more reasonable price. Also wonder if Randall Cobb looks at the whole situation and decides maybe it's best for him to get as big a contract as he can the first time he hits free agency.
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

It will be interesting to follow this once the season is done. The Packers are in a pretty good negotiating position as the receiving corp, even without Greg, is a relative strength. Jordy, Randall and James are a hell of a 1-2-3, and a few of the young guys really intrigue me, especially Boykin.

Wouldn't it be weird to see #85 back on the field for the Pack. It could happen.
Cobb's a fine player, want him to be a Packer, but I just don't get how he gets equated with Jennings all the time. Jennings is a precise route runner who gets YAC. Cobb was put in position this year to be matched up against LBs and safeties - and he was effective. I haven't seen much of him lining up as a wideout or in the slot and getting open. Not to say he can't but can he get open when covered by a #1 or #2 CB? Do we know?
quote:
Originally posted by Tdog:
Cobb's a fine player, want him to be a Packer, but I just don't get how he gets equated with Jennings all the time. Jennings is a precise route runner who gets YAC. Cobb was put in position this year to be matched up against LBs and safeties - and he was effective. I haven't seen much of him lining up as a wideout or in the slot and getting open. Not to say he can't but can he get open when covered by a #1 or #2 CB? Do we know?


This!
Whatever it takes, but get something going at TE ... guy(s) that can catch and is a blocker.

Having Jennings is really nice but IMO, the Oline and its ingredients(TE) need to be upgraded, you get that to the upper crust in the NFL and Jennngs is just a luxury.

BTW, if I'm GM, MY first priority is to get a slobber-knocking defense put together. We have pieces, its time to put it together using all means necessary.

I'd rather give up Jennings if I can get the rest of the pieces for the defense.

Keep drafting WR's, they've done well. IMO, receiving in MM system is a science that becomes an art.

JMO.
Cobb needs to cut down on his drops. Maybe James Jones can give him some tips.

I think Jennings won't get the contract he is expecting, but I still think he is gone. He has been hurt for the past couple of seasons, so I think people have forgotten how good he really is/was. Cobb is a different type of player, and TT needs to explore drafting a replacement for Jennings.
quote:
Originally posted by Tdog:
Cobb's a fine player, want him to be a Packer, but I just don't get how he gets equated with Jennings all the time. Jennings is a precise route runner who gets YAC. Cobb was put in position this year to be matched up against LBs and safeties - and he was effective. I haven't seen much of him lining up as a wideout or in the slot and getting open. Not to say he can't but can he get open when covered by a #1 or #2 CB? Do we know?
From todays Peter King's MMQB:



4. I think if you have a chance, and you care about the Packers, you should find Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel beat man Bob McGinn's rankings of Green Bay's individual players. His takes are bracingly honest. Like the one on wide receiver Greg Jennings: "Will be 30 early next season, has missed 11 of the last 22 games due to injury and in all probability will be allowed to walk in March as an unrestricted free agent. Averaged merely 10.5 yards per catch, including 4.3 after the catch. Early in season as a slot, there were times it seemed he was just looking for a place to fall down. Just how strong his market value will be could hinge on how much stock scouts put on his superb performance at Minnesota in the regular-season finale. Gifted, precise runner still offers vertical stretch. There are just too many other capable players at his position and too many players at other positions that must be paid. Grade: C-plus.'' McGinn. A classic.
Charles Woodson probably had the exact same kind of review when Green Bay hired him at age 30.

McGinn is a great writer when he sticks to football. He's also an infamous pot-stirrer who sometimes publishes pure bullcrap in order to get a rise out of people and earn internet hits.

Bottom line really is GJ could be on the decline, he could also go on a 6 year tear. Who knows? All TT can do is play the odds, and odds are against the latter, when big salary cap money is at stake.
Or he is planning on buying a bigger house after he signs blockbuster deal with Packers.

Actually I heard Andrew Brandt on WSSP Big Show and he said it appears Packers are letting him go because usually a team will make offer b4 free agency and no offer has been made. Once player hits market they have upper hand. So TT is either letting him test free agency and see what happens or has just moved on.
Last edited by GreenBayLA

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×