Wes Welker signs with the Rams
#THANKNOTKENNYROGERS
Wes Welker signs with the Rams
#THANKNOTKENNYROGERS
And how is that working out in the locker room now that contracts are coming due? He isn't a thug but he's a perfect fit for that ****heel locker room.
Shut up about it already.
Technically, he'd be gone this year as he just got an extension from Seattle.
"It's a pleasure to be here," Davis told reporters at a news conference the next day at 49ers headquarters. "I've always wanted to come here. I was sitting at the table yesterday and Green Bay was up and I was telling my agent, 'I hope Green Bay doesn't take me. I definitely don't want to go there.'
Yeah, because what the guy says the day after about the team that passed and the one that drafted him is reliable how?
Yeah, he was going to come out and say "Damn it, why did I have to get drafted by this ****-sucking team? I really wanted to be in Green Bay with a decent organization and fans, not these bayside goobers!"
Instead he had the statement all prepared: "It's a pleasure to be here," Davis told reporters at a news conference the next day at (insert team who drafted him here) headquarters. "I've always wanted to come here. I was sitting at the table yesterday and (team who passed on him) was up and I was telling my agent, 'I hope (team who passed on him) doesn't take me. I definitely don't want to go there.'
More reliable than the straw mountain you just constructed.
It's Monday night after week 9. I honestly had no clue regarding the sheer volume of dumbass posters this board has as members.
So what you're saying is Uncle Tranny Ted is the Ashy Larry of the FA world?
More reliable than the straw mountain you just constructed.
It's Monday night after week 9. I honestly had no clue regarding the sheer volume of dumbass posters this board has as members.
You seem to not understand the concept of "Strawman".
More reliable than the straw mountain you just constructed.
It's Monday night after week 9. I honestly had no clue regarding the sheer volume of dumbass posters this board has as members.
Imagine the Packer interwebs in 1973--just begging for the John Hadl trade. Or the 1981 forums, thumping the drum for a trade for John Jefferson, who at age 29 was going to be all that was needed to get the Packers back into the playoffs.....
While Joe Thomas would be sweet, that was never going to happen under Thompson, and that's perfectly understandable. A 1 & 2 for Thomas and a 4 would be a decent price for the talent, but rather expensive overall.
A ham sandwich for Davis, on the other hand, is the kind of move that has almost no downside and could help down the stretch and on a playoff run. That's not a "give up the farm" trade, it's the kind of move the Packers are in position to make if they're serious about winning a Super Bowl.
I would rather TT trade 1 first rounder for 3 established players who can add depth when guys are struggling rather than 3 1st for one superstar who could be 1 play away from a career ending injury.
As far as trading for Davis, who knows. Maybe TT called his agent and VD said he would not report if traded to the Packers. That is the kind of guy he is afterall.
Just saying but they did make it back to the playoffs in 1982. Which back then, seemed pretty much impossible.
And how is that working out in the locker room now that contracts are coming due? He isn't a thug but he's a perfect fit for that ****heel locker room.
Shut up about it already.
Technically, he'd be gone this year as he just got an extension from Seattle.
What does that have to do with 2010?
McGuinn?
His 12 string electric was quite the new sound back then.
And how is that working out in the locker room now that contracts are coming due? He isn't a thug but he's a perfect fit for that ****heel locker room.
Shut up about it already.
Technically, he'd be gone this year as he just got an extension from Seattle.
What does that have to do with 2010?
The contract shenanigans didn't really kick in until he "supported" Chancellor this year. Sure, he wanted a contract before, what pounder RB doesn't with their short shelf life, but he wasn't a problem about it.
But I'm not just talking about the contract. I'm talking about the "divided locker room" crap after the Superbowl and general malcontent crap when everybody's contract started coming due.
@zachkruse2: Hey guys, here's the last two weeks.
Justin Perillo: 5 catches, 58 yards, TD
Vernon Davis: 2 catches, 19 yards.
Yeah, because Peyton Manning has been able to get the ball to anyone on his own team lately. Talk about missing context......
@zachkruse2: Hey guys, here's the last two weeks.
Justin Perillo: 5 catches, 58 yards, TD
Vernon Davis: 2 catches, 19 yards.
He didn't get to play against the Packers defense.
Yeah, because Peyton Manning has been able to get the ball to anyone on his own team lately. Talk about missing context......
This.
That production is much more about Peyton's terrible play (which included benching him) than what Davis did/didn't do.
Yeah, because Peyton Manning has been able to get the ball to anyone on his own team lately. Talk about missing context......
Ted could have 18 and the dealer have a showing 19 at the black jack table and he would hold.
Ted could have 18 and the dealer have a showing 19 at the black jack table and he would hold.
TT is to free agency / trading as Austin Powers is to BlackJack. Staying on 10 and waiting for the dealer to bust.
For first time this spring, NFL expected to allow teams to begin trading compensatory draft picks, per NFL sources. Should be more trades.
— Adam Schefter (@AdamSchefter) November 19, 2015
Should be more trades.
Ted just got wood !!!!
What? TT trades picks all the time during the draft.
Yeah, because Peyton Manning has been able to get the ball to anyone on his own team lately. Talk about missing context......
6 Catches for 68 Yards and some nice, open-field run blocking in Osweiler's first start.
Yes, VD looked pretty good yesterday but obviously the Pack didn't need him.
Yeah, because Peyton Manning has been able to get the ball to anyone on his own team lately. Talk about missing context......
Act 1 was pretty good
Define gambling?
Taking a slow-footed underachiever in the 3rd round of the draft and annointing him the TE of the future could be considered a gamble.
Not addressing the ILBer position, year after year could be considered a gamble, no?
2014 draft is looking fugly.
Define gambling?
Taking a slow-footed underachiever in the 3rd round of the draft and annointing him the TE of the future could be considered a gamble.
Not addressing the ILBer position, year after year could be considered a gamble, no?
Exactly. No depth at LT either. None. Second most important position on the team.
Draft & develop has some great benefits, but one of the overriding factors involved with that which is hindering this team is time. It takes time in the system to develop many of these players, and using that as your sole source of talent procurement involves risk. Banking on these young, inexperienced players at important positions to perform at a high, NFL level, every year is a risk.
Do we have time? Did we have time? I question that, as Rodgers was at his peak 4-5 years ago, and he stayed there pretty much through this span. How much longer will he be playing at a high level? Is he playing at that same high level now? Sure doesn't look like it. That time may have passed. At least, is sure is looking that way.
And, that is just Rodgers. What about our front 7? Zero sacks yesterday? Zero? Daniels, Matthews, Raji, Jones, Palmer, Elliott, Peppers, Guion, Neal, Perry, Palmer. All of them, absent. Absent. Zeros.
Where is the development? D & D is a two part process. Seems our entire coaching staff has failed as much as anyone. Then look to our players. Do we have the horses to finish the race? How many legit superstars do we have on this team. One? Two? Pretty hard to say we have three... That's on Ted Thompson and his personnel staff. Imagine what another key player or two added via FA or trade could have done to help this team. The possibilities are pretty vast, but you can't win if you don't play.
This is looking like a pretty complete breakdown in Green Bay, on all levels.
All we have to hope for now is to sneak in the back door for the playoffs and make another improbable run.
Nice.
According to ESPN, Green Bay ranks 31st in guaranteed money given to players signed in 2016. Their total of $14.7 million pales in comparison to the $280M doled out by the Eagles. One reason the Packers’ number is so low is GM Ted Thompson’s aversion to signing other team’s free agents, but that’s hardly the only reason.
Led by vice president of player finance Russ Ball, the Packers are simply better than most organizations at negotiating contracts. Philadelphia and GM Howie Roseman spent $280M in guaranteed money on the following 13 players: quarterbacks Sam Bradford and Chase Daniel, tight ends Zach Ertz and Brent Celek, offensive linemen Lane Johnson and Brandon Brooks, defensive linemen Fletcher Cox and Vinny Curry, linebacker Nigel Bradham, cornerbacks Leodis McKelvin and Ron Brooks and safeties Malcolm Jenkins and Rodney McLeod.
For the sake of comparison, Green Bay spent just over $170M in guaranteed money on the following 13 players: quarterback Aaron Rodgers, outside linebackers Clay Matthews, Julius Peppers and Nick Perry, defensive lineman Mike Daniels, wide receivers Randall Cobb and Jordy Nelson, offensive linemen T.J. Lang, Josh Sitton and Bryan Bulaga, cornerback Sam Shields, safety Morgan Burnett and kicker Mason Crosby.
Snip-
The explanation is that Green Bay is far superior to the Eagles, and just about every other team, when it comes to negotiating contracts. Thompson does a great job of identifying players worth extending and Ball does a great job of getting those players signed to fair deals. Philly just gave guard Brandon Brooks over $20M in guaranteed money. Do you think either Sitton or Lang will get nearly that much from Green Bay even though they’re better players? If you don’t know the answer to that question, you haven’t been paying attention.
And finally, it’s not just the Eagles who are throwing around ridiculous amounts of guaranteed money. The other highest spenders this spring were the Giants ($140M), Redskins ($114M), Ravens ($114M), Jags ($103M) and Raiders ($100M). Notice a trend? Spending crazily allows teams to “win” the offseason, and in the process, give their fans something to be excited about heading into the fall.
31st in guaranteed $$. Tightwad Ted. Those other team's guaranteed money numbers are insane. Holy shat..
Gambling is for losers
With every win the urge to gamble gets greater. Hence wins equal losses.
This is why casinos have betting limits; otherwise the St. Petersburg paradox would lead to theoretically infinite payouts.