Bye Week.
OVER.
Strap in. This one's got classic written all over it.@packers. @49ers. Sunday night by the Bay. #GBvsSF pic.twitter.com/KEmIa4aPvz
โ SNF on NBC (@SNFonNBC) November 18, 2019
Bye Week.
OVER.
Strap in. This one's got classic written all over it.@packers. @49ers. Sunday night by the Bay. #GBvsSF pic.twitter.com/KEmIa4aPvz
โ SNF on NBC (@SNFonNBC) November 18, 2019
Replies sorted oldest to newest
Every time we think a game might be an instant classic, one team blows the other out.
I will say this game SHOULD be a lot better than the one we saw last night in L.A.
They're definitely hyping it like an NFC Championship Game preview
Several injuries to keep an eye on for the Whiners. Kittle obviously is a big one.
But Dee Ford got hurt yesterday with a hamstring (those almost always linger) and didn't return. DL DJ Jones also out.
Robbie Gould didn't play again.
Their T Staley is hurt again, was out.
GB is clearly the healthier team going into this one.
Definitely are. I think they've been saving Kittle for this one. Sunday the 24th will mark 24 days since he's played. Don't know how severe his injury is.
I think Staley might play -- he was forced to have surgery or his hand would've stayed that waqy & look like McCarren's. BTW....Staley is a great guy. I listen to him every week on the rock station 107.7 the Bone. He's the type of player you root for except when he plays vs. Green Bay.
The D-Line injuries & WR injuries are more concerning for them. They held onto the football better yesterday & didn't have so many drops like vs. Seattle.
Feels great baby!
Signed,
Jimmy Garrapolo
Looking forward to this game
Let's just hope the Packers OTs hold up better against the 49ers than they did vs. the Chargers in the last road game. If they're whiffing like they were in that game, it's going to be tough.
We all like to think of the Pack's OTs as one of the stronger areas of the team, they need to show that this weekend and not look like reincarnations of Jon Michels and Allen Barbre like they did 2 weeks ago.
I admit that I haven't seen even one minute of a 49ers game this year so I have no idea how good they really are. Their schedule gets pretty tough with GB, @ Ravens, Saints, and @ Seahawks. So hopefully they will have some losses yet to come.
As for the game on Sunday the two keys to me are if the 49ers TE plays and the Packers OT cannot afford to have another OLE matador performance on Sunday.
Well....you're in for a treat because the Niner defense is friggin FAST. Very very fast. They have like 89 first round draft picks from picking in the top 10 for the last decade.
Rodgers handles the blitz probably better than any other QB.
Best way to beat Rodgers is rush 4 (get home with 4) cover 7. He knows how to beat that too which is dink & dunk but he'll have to stay patient & if the Packers are behind we have seen him be IMpatient.
Run the ball....a couple scrambles by Rodgers are always a good idea -- maybe an explosive play or 2. O-Line needs to be ready! No giveaways!!
On defense bend but don't break, pressure on Jimmy G plus a turnover or 2. WIN!
Last time we played in Levi Stadium, Packers scored at will, and blew out the Whiners. The crowd had a significant amount of Packer fans, and we were loud. I don't expect as large a turnout this year. Has anyone heard anything about this from our talking heads?
I'll be there -- and hope we come away with another win!
Said it before, I'll say it again. This game isn't going to be as tough as people think.
I view the poor OT performance against the Chargers as more an anomaly than a cause for concern. I'm saving that for the area that's pretty consistently struggled of late- the defense. Need to tighten it up outside the red zone and get a few more stops.
Covering the TE would be nice.
Remember that time in โ89 when Majik beat SF with Montana in Candlestick? Tim Harris was a beast that day...
packerboi posted:Several injuries to keep an eye on for the Whiners. Kittle obviously is a big one.
But Dee Ford got hurt yesterday with a hamstring (those almost always linger) and didn't return. DL DJ Jones also out.
Robbie Gould didn't play again.
Their T Staley is hurt again, was out.
GB is clearly the healthier team going into this one.
Kittles, Breida, and Sanders are the key injuries to watch on the offensive side of the ball.
The backup TE actually looked pretty good, but a healthy Kittles would be tough for us to defend.
Breida adds the speed element to SF's running attack that has been mostly shut down the past 2 weeks in his absence. (I don't think he goes next Sunday after re-aggravating the sprained ankle).
Sanders did not look healthy yesterday and if he is limited it is the rookie Samuel and a bunch of JAGs at WR.
Staley is not likely to play, which may be a blessing in disguise for SF because his backup Skule has probably outplayed him thus far in 2019.
Hope that Ford and Jones miss the game as that is a formidable defensive front with Bosa, Bruckner, Armstead, etc. rotating all game long.
And it would be nice for Gould to sit out another game as well.
Nice to see all 53 on the roster practicing for GB and the other team's dealing with injuries for once.
The Heckler posted:I admit that I haven't seen even one minute of a 49ers game this year so I have no idea how good they really are.
The Formula set by the Seahags was to load the crap out of the box, like 8-9 in the box, and force Jimmy to beat you. He WILL throw that secondary at least 2 picks to them, Can the Packers secondary haul them in? The Hags 2 weeks ago should have had 4 INT's easy. They dropped 2 that hit them right in the chest.
The whiners had 34 yards rushing yesterday. The Cards have a terrible secondary, thus the reason they blew a 16 point lead.
When they were rolling, the 49ers were RTFB game in, game out. And the Jimmy would do enough to keep defense honest. Now in the last 2 weeks, teams are loading the box.
Not real hard to guess what Angry Bald Man's plan will be.
As healthy as they can be.
Everyone on the Packers roster was on the field for the first post-bye week practice, including Ty Summers and Tre Smith after both left the last game to be evaluated for concussions. https://t.co/UxTEIztjxz pic.twitter.com/g0TWiV6ElW
โ Rob Demovsky (@RobDemovsky) November 18, 2019
LaFleur says self-scout last week reviewed #Packers' strengths and weaknesses, but also dug into tendencies that had developed over first 10 games, in hopes of breaking those tendencies in final 6 games.
โ Ryan Wood (@ByRyanWood) November 18, 2019
#Packers coach Matt LaFleur says team will leave to San Francisco on Saturday, not Friday. A changeup from travel plans when GB went to LA Chargers. He says change came after conversation with training staff.
โ Ryan Wood (@ByRyanWood) November 18, 2019
They were going to leave Saturday "regardless" of Sunday night game.
Music City posted:Remember that time in โ89 when Majik beat SF with Montana in Candlestick? Tim Harris was a beast that day...
In my best Chris Farley voice "That was awesome!!".
I just saw the NFL Network's ranking of the top 100 teams in NFL history and I think that '89 49ers team was something like 5th or 6th best of all time. That was a great upset. I remember Brian Noble absolutely leveling Joe Montana on a blitz he didn't see. I give Montana credit for staying in the game after that one. He was one tough sonofabitch even though that was one of the rare games he didn't pull out.
Just watched the first drive, SF goes 3-n-out. DH takes it straight to the house on the first punt. Really wish you had posted that before the bye weekend. Damn that brings back memories.
I do remember the 89 game. That was one of those cardiac Pack games, down to the wire. It was absolutely tragic that team didn't make the post season.
Having a late season bye is always preferred. IMO the 49ers having a bye in week 4 is showing...they are a bit beat up and have shown some fatigue. Injuries have piled up and their stellar defense has leaked a bit lately : 25 , 27, and 26 points given up to the Cardinals, Seahags, and Cardinals again. Oops. The Elite One needs to score some points in this one.
Niners are all about their defense foremost...then their running game, and Shannahan. If Pettine can put this on Garopollo the Packer defense will have its chances.
Wonder how much the LaFleur brothers have shared ?? Will be interesting to see the chess match with all of the familiarity Shannahan and the LaFleurs have ??
From Mercury News:
DEFENSIVE INJURIES: Pass rusher Dee Ford exited with a right-hamstring strain after a second-quarter sack, and that puts his availiability in doubt for the upcoming games against Green Bay (Aaron Rodgers), Baltimore (Lamar Jackson) and New Orleans (Drew Brees). Also hurt were cornerbacks Emmanuel Moseley (cramping; returned to game) and KโWaun Williams (stinger). Moseley made three solid tackles before getting hurt, and he also made a perfect pass-defense on a second-down throw in the second quarter.
GB is incredibly healthy for this time of year. Gotta cash in on that because it very rarely comes around.
packerboi posted:Not real hard to guess what Angry Bald Man's plan will be.
TEs wide open over the middle every play?
GB is going to win this football game. No knock on SF, but GB is much healthier and coming off a bye. AR12 doesn't turn the ball over and he is protected by two of the best OT's the league has to offer. I fully expect Jones and Adams to have big games. The Smith brothers will get some pressure on Jimmy G and force him to throw us a couple of balls. A pick 6 is in Alexander's immediate future.
Oh... Blake Martinez will lead the team in tackles. Again.
Oh x 2... Gary will have a major impact on the game. Afterwards, I will tell many of you to suck it.
Packers are 3 point dogs with the total at 46.
I say put your coin on the Pack to win outright at +140 and parlay it with the over. 27-20 Packers. $100 bet pays $358.20
Crazy interesting stat from Barnwell this AM.
In 180 snaps with him [Jones] on the field and Williams on the sideline, the Packers have averaged 0.22 EPA per play, which would make them the best offense in football on a play-by-play basis.
In 127 snaps with Williams on the field and Jones sitting out, though, the Packers have actually been a net negative on offense at -0.05 EPA per play, which is the equivalent of the 2019 Giants, who rank 25th in expected points added.
If one back makes you the best offense in football and the other back makes you the Giants, I would go with the first guy.
I like MLF learning from the last trip to California and not giving these young men the extra day for shenanigans.
Timpranillo posted:Crazy interesting stat from Barnwell this AM.
In 180 snaps with him [Jones] on the field and Williams on the sideline, the Packers have averaged 0.22 EPA per play, which would make them the best offense in football on a play-by-play basis.
In 127 snaps with Williams on the field and Jones sitting out, though, the Packers have actually been a net negative on offense at -0.05 EPA per play, which is the equivalent of the 2019 Giants, who rank 25th in expected points added.
If one back makes you the best offense in football and the other back makes you the Giants, I would go with the first guy.
Stats schmats....watch the game.
YATittle posted:I like MLF learning from the last trip to California and not giving these young men the extra day for shenanigans.
Max and Paul do not approve.
๐ญit!
BrainDed posted:Packers are 3 point dogs with the total at 46.
I say put your coin on the Pack to win outright at +140 and parlay it with the over. 27-20 Packers. $100 bet pays $358.20
Damn....nothing like getting 5/2 on your hard earned cash
Timpranillo posted:Crazy interesting stat from Barnwell this AM.
In 180 snaps with him [Jones] on the field and Williams on the sideline, the Packers have averaged 0.22 EPA per play, which would make them the best offense in football on a play-by-play basis.
In 127 snaps with Williams on the field and Jones sitting out, though, the Packers have actually been a net negative on offense at -0.05 EPA per play, which is the equivalent of the 2019 Giants, who rank 25th in expected points added.
If one back makes you the best offense in football and the other back makes you the Giants, I would go with the first guy.
What about when they're both on the field?
That's the kind of stat that makes you think "stats are for weenies"
LOVE IT when they're both on the field at the same time. Williams is a better blocker for Jones then our fullback, and both are threats as runners and receivers.
Unlike the MM offense, the D has NO CLUE what we will do.
Especially if they keep Davante on the field
Yeah, unlike a certain goalline play vs. Carolina. Put Adams on one side, Lazard on the other and we would have scored...
I liked what AZ did to SF yesterday. They made that defense run to the sidelines and cover the field. Tried to tire out those gigantic DL and it was working.
On defense AZ dared SF to pass. Stacked the box and said beat us by throwing it.
I think AZ could easily have won that game if they had a little more seasoning.
Richard Sherman: Conspiracy Theory
I would like to see both Jones & Jamal with Graham & Big Dog (Marcedes) & only Davante split outside.
Uh-huh.....Maybe MLF is saving that for the playoffs. ๐
Pakrz posted:GB is going to win this football game. No knock on SF, but GB is much healthier and coming off a bye. AR12 doesn't turn the ball over and he is protected by two of the best OT's the league has to offer. I fully expect Jones and Adams to have big games. The Smith brothers will get some pressure on Jimmy G and force him to throw us a couple of balls. A pick 6 is in Alexander's immediate future.
Oh... Blake Martinez will lead the team in tackles. Again.
Oh x 2... Gary will have a major impact on the game. Afterwards, I will tell many of you to suck it.
You seem angry.
Playing SF on the left coast, then turn around & have to play following week in NY. I don't care how "bad" the Giants supposedly are, that's not going to be as easy as the records indicate