Skip to main content

Have to say, a lot of what Davon House has done this year I like. He's a good player.

 

But durability is again an issue. 2 games played in 2011. 9 in 2012. Did pretty good last year and great this year until again, a shoulder injury. He's also listed at 6'00 200. If he's 180, I'd be shocked.

 

In MM speak, I highly doubt he plays on Sunday. As a UFA in 2015, he's going to be an interesting re-sign/let walk decision by TT.

So, it appears the referee crew is Bill Leavy's according to Football Zebras

 

When you couple that with this article, we should expect a physical game with the Bills' secondary with only moderate levels of calls (especially with regard to illegal contact). 

 

As an added bonus they have great cheerleaders, the Buffalo Jills, that have been fully informed how to behave and groom!

 

Last edited by Green Crustacean

From Bills.com; more meaningless stats

 

Third and long is no problem

Green Bay is 3rd in the league in third down conversion percentage, moving the sticks at a rate of almost 48 percent. What’s unusual is when they’re faced with third and long situations the Packers rank even higher in conversions. When faced with a 3rd-and-6 or more situation they convert at a rate of better than 40 percent, which leads the league. They’re also the best in the NFL at 3rd-and-10 plus conversions this season.

 

11

injury report vs. Bills

Eddie Lacy - Probable

Lang - Prob

Perry - Prob

Sitton - Prob

Gaston - Prob

Last edited by H5
Originally Posted by Satori:

From Bills.com; more meaningless stats

 

Third and long is no problem

Green Bay is 3rd in the league in third down conversion percentage, moving the sticks at a rate of almost 48 percent. What’s unusual is when they’re faced with third and long situations the Packers rank even higher in conversions. When faced with a 3rd-and-6 or more situation they convert at a rate of better than 40 percent, which leads the league. They’re also the best in the NFL at 3rd-and-10 plus conversions this season.

 

11


Perhaps they should always go for it on 4th down too. 

Originally Posted by Dr._Bob:
Perhaps they should always go for it on 4th down too. 

The statistics guys argue that coaches should go for it much more often on 4th down and go for two more often. With a superstar QB and a solid running game, I would argue GB should consider going for it any time they are between the 40s in a punting situation.

 

In a playoff game if the Packers are up by less than a TD but more than a FG, would you rather put your season no Aaron Rodgers and the offense picking up a 4th and 5 at midfield, or punting and counting on our defense to hold up in a 2 minute drill over 80 yards? Heck, even if you don't get the first down you maybe gain 35 yards from punting (assuming you're not punting to someone like Hester or Sproles).

 

I know this. Mike Sherman sure wishes he'd have gone for the 4th and 1 from the 40 with Ahman Green, than punt and leave it to the defense in the 2004 playoff game. I think the same dynamics are there this year.

Last edited by "We"-Ka-Bong

I listened to a podcast called "Titletown Soundoff" where one of the speakers pointed out this interesting set of facts about about our defense ranking in 2014 for points:  

 

Q1:  10th  3.9/game

Q2:  11th  5.8/game

Q3:  11th  4.3/game 

Q4:  31st   9.4/game

 

You can see it directly here at this site.  Since the Packers have won 9 of their last 10 games, this tells me that the defense is holding up pretty well while the game is in hand, but give up a LOT of points during garbage time.  That was the speaker in the podcast's conclusion as well.

 

I'm not worried as much about the defense during this game.  I'm going to focus on their D-Line vs. the Packers' O-Line.

Last edited by Green Crustacean

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×