quote:Originally posted by packerboi:
And yet people wonder why MM didn't want to bring Frick and Frack down to the SB until the last possible moment.
Good point...
Good point...
Good point...
More proof that Tweeters are for rectal openings and vice-versa.
I go with the poster who said it's bruising their egos that the Pac k made the Super Bowl without their talents in the starting lineup. Especially Barnett, who can see with his eyes that the D may be BETTER without him in there.
I sure hope not... if their egos are bruised because the team won anyway, I want them off the team. NOW.
They should be happy for the organization, their teammates, and they should be motivated as hell to get back on the field so they can contribute to next year's Championship.
They should be happy for the organization, their teammates, and they should be motivated as hell to get back on the field so they can contribute to next year's Championship.
Can you be put on IR with a bruised ego?
I think it would have to be more serious like a torn ego
A lot of players do better if they just have the ego removed
quote:A lot of players do better if they just have the ego removed
is the procedure in or out patient? I'm all for it.
I can understand Barnett and Finley going home for rehab and such during the regular season. Once the playoffs started they should have been in Green Bay with the team. Whether they would have gone to every playoff game is irrelavent, but they needed to be there talking, offering help to their repalcements during meeting and practice. Good bye Nicky, hope you read X4.
quote:Originally posted by ammo:
I can understand Barnett and Finley going home for rehab and such during the regular season. Once the playoffs started they should have been in Green Bay with the team. Whether they would have gone to every playoff game is irrelavent, but they needed to be there talking, offering help to their repalcements during meeting and practice. Good bye Nicky, hope you read X4.
Yup. From what I've gathered, Finley is ready to play so he's likely done with rehab. So why isn't he in Green Bay with the team?
I read the exact opposite in a Silverstein chat last week:
# Q: gene, chicago - thanks for taking my question. Should Finley or Grant have been kept on the 53
# A: Tom Silverstein - Finley isn't close to being ready and Grant is only now good enough to even work out at full strength. Both decisions were the correct ones.
# Q: gene, chicago - thanks for taking my question. Should Finley or Grant have been kept on the 53
# A: Tom Silverstein - Finley isn't close to being ready and Grant is only now good enough to even work out at full strength. Both decisions were the correct ones.
yeah i started a thread like this after they got hurt....
