Skip to main content

Originally Posted by BrainDed:

       
Yes.   If BPA in the 1rst round is a QB, Ted's not taking him.





That QB might be the best player available in YOUR opinion, might not be in Ted's opinion. I think when he's been faced with "take a player we don't need even though he's the BPA on my board" he has traded down.
Last edited by Grave Digger

Crabtree was the top tier.  He was the top guy on the entire board.  Thompson thought he was the best player in the draft.  But they had wide receivers, so Ted passed on the player they had graded as the best in the draft and took a player who filled a need.

 

http://www.jsonline.com/sports/packers/44237962.html

 

------------------------------------------------------

 

Sources around the National Football League said last week that the Green Bay Packers were prepared to select Matthews with the No. 9 pick if nose tackle B.J. Raji was off the board.

 

At No. 9, Thompson admitted that he paused to collect his thoughts. Not only was Raji there, but somewhat expectedly so was wide receiver Michael Crabtree. Thompson needed a few moments to take it all in.

 

Because Crabtree carried the highest grade of any player on the Packers' entire draft board, the assumption was that Thompson would stay true to the team's rankings and take him. But Thompson came to the conclusion well before the Packers went on the clock that they were well-stocked at wide receiver and adding Crabtree might create a mess in which no wideout was happy with his number of targeted passes.

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree.  I have strong doubts that anyone in the media truly knows what the Packer's draft board has.  Everything in TT's history as GM of the Packers tells me he would NEVER give the media insight into his draft board.  My guess is that the Crabtree being the highest player on the draft board was rumor, leaks, conjecture and speculation and JS reported that.  Or maybe Crabtree was the highest player on his board but he realized that you can't have 5 WR's on a team that consider themselves a #1 or #2.  You need 4's and 5's that play special teams.  So yeah, in that respect TT doesn't completely ignore need and draft 100% based only on pure player evaluation.  Is that so bad?  Do you really want a GM that would draft a QB in the first round when you have the best QB in the world in his prime?  

CAPackFan95's annual Mock Draft (1st round only).  LET'S DO THIS!

 

 

PickTeamPlayerNotes
1Tampa BayGrootGroot's ability to form plants and clog up the middle of the line is too much to pass up.
2TennesseeInanimate Carbon RodIn Rod Tennessee trusts
3JacksonvilleTim TebowShalid Khan finally figures out that the city needs a rallying point.
4OaklandUsain BoltAl Davis is dead. But LOVES straight line speed.
5WashingtonJameis WinstonBest spot for Winston, a well run and drama free organization
6New York JetsJesus Christ himselfJets fans go apoplectic anyway.  And, yes I know it's in Chicago this year
7ChicagoMarcus MariotaHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA
8AtlantaManual OrtegaWho?  Arthur Blank found him cheap in a Home Depot parking lot
9New York GiantsTodd GurleyGiants need another RB that will be injured incessantly
10St. LouisRoger SterlingJeff Fisher loved his stache in the season opener of Mad Men
11MinnesotaTyler VargaA FB that was projected by most in the 7th round.  
12ClevelandDr. Jeffrey BryantJohnny Manziel's life coach was a must get here.
13New OrleansMaxx WilliamsSomething something Jimmy Graham
14MiamiLeBron JamesPlease come back.  Please
15San FranciscoAnthony RobbinsThey need someone to help make Tomsula not appear like a child molester
16HoustonMatt SchaubPick 6's are exciting!
17San DiegoJedediah DuggarJeremiah?  James?  Who knows? One of those damned Duggar kids to keep Rivers and his 42 kids happy
18Kansas CityJamaal Charles ACLCan never have enough of these
19ClevelandCharles JolyThe world's best bartender will have his work cut out for him taking care of Manziel
20PhiladelphiaMelvin GordanALL YOUR RB ARE BELONG TO CHIP KELLY
21CincinnatiAlbert BurnekoDeadspin writer that called Cincinnati Chili "diarrhea on a plate".  Fans will pelt him with oyster crackers all year.
22PittsburghStefan DjordjevicIf this local talent from Ampipe high can get his attitude in order, he'll be sure to have All The Right Moves
23DetroitAmari CooperMatt Millen allowed back to make the pick. WHAT A 40 time!
24ArizonaN/ADoes anyone really care at this point?
25CarolinaRae CarruthToo soon?
26BaltimoreLittle Jimmy PoindexterRavens fill weak spot at Video Tape runner
27DallasJohnny ManzielA drunk and belligerent Jerry Jones tackles his son going up with pick and replaces it with this.
28DenverAustin ColliePEYTON GETS WHAT PEYTON WANTS
29IndianapolisBeard OilIf your QB is gonna look like Mose Shrute, and least get that beard until control
30Green BayLeonard WilliamsWho?
31New OrleansDoes it really matterNo.  No it doesn't
32New EnglandChris BorlandSure he retired but everyone still praises Belichick for the bold call.  "THAT'S WHY HE'S THE BEST" screams a shirtless and sweaty Chris Berman
Last edited by Timpranillo

Crabtree was the top tier.  He was the top guy on the entire board.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

According to McGinn.

 

Notice how none of the quotes McGinn used from Thompson in that article support the idea that Crabtree was #1? In fact they support the idea that Crabtree was in the same tier as Raji, and Thompson wanted Raji and Matthews. If Crabtree were #1 on the Packers board, and only Thompson really knows for sure, no way TT doesn't take him.

 

 

Last edited by H5
Originally Posted by CAPackFan95:
Originally Posted by ChilliJon:

even though it appeared this might not be entirely serious? 

HOW DARE YOU?

You need to publish your mock consensus board in order for us to take you seriously. I know this because I am a nationally accredited and certified Internet Mock Draft Expert consultant. You should buy my Ebook.

Originally Posted by Grave Digger:
Originally Posted by BrainDed:

       
Yes.   If BPA in the 1rst round is a QB, Ted's not taking him.



That QB might be the best player available in YOUR opinion, might not be in Ted's opinion. I think when he's been faced with "take a player we don't need even though he's the BPA on my board" he has traded down.

So he doesn't take BPA then?  What if there isn't good value in the trade?   Spot should command a high 3rd, but nobody is offering?  What if BPA fills a need but the Vikings are offering their next 3 first rounders?

 

It's ludicrous to say he only drafts BPA.    It's a complicated equation.

Originally Posted by El-Ka-Bong:
Originally Posted by Fedya:
I read BrainDed's comment to mean that Ted's not taking a QB in the first round this year.

 So did I.  

 

And like I said, is the assumption Ted would pass on a QB because he has a pro bowl QB already in the fold?  

 

Yes.. Pro Bowl and still in his prime.   Two years or more from now, the need would be different and he might consider taking a lap faller at QB again. 

Agree with Boris.
 
But, for sh!ts and giggles...
 invest in another first round QB right now.

 

What is the investment though?

 

The 30th pick in 2014 got this contract:

 

YearBase Salary(Guaranteed)Cap
Number
 
2014$420,000  $420,000$1,293,187
2015$743,297  $743,297$1,616,484
2016$1,066,594   $1,066,594$1,939,781
2017$690,000$2,263,077

 

 

If there is a 1st round talent QB why wouldn't you take him? The investment is not great.

 

 

 

 

Last edited by H5
If a QB was there who was worthy of the pick, I would expect some other team to offer a trade. Seems to me QB would be the one position you could almost expect that to happen.

BPA is great, but if a guy is rated #33 in the top 100, and he fits a team need, why wouldn't you take him at 30? Trading down and adding picks, and still getting all the players you've targeted is great, too, but you have to have other teams willing to make trades.
Last edited by Packmeister
Originally Posted by Packmeister:
BPA is great, but if a guy is rated #33 in the top 100, and he fits a team need, why wouldn't you take him at 30? 

Because perhaps a player rated #15 is also there. Understand?

 

For instance, an ILB TT has rated #33 overall is there at 30. Also a WR rated #15 is there. Let's also add a DB rated #21 is there.

 

He might take the WR. He could take the DB. However....

 

TT most likely trades down a spot or 2 & still gets the "Packer People" he covets.

 

That's how you work the draft....That's how the master works the draft. I've watched him since 2005. He's brilliant.

Originally Posted by BrainDed:
Originally Posted by Grave Digger:
Originally Posted by BrainDed:

       
Yes.   If BPA in the 1rst round is a QB, Ted's not taking him.



That QB might be the best player available in YOUR opinion, might not be in Ted's opinion. I think when he's been faced with "take a player we don't need even though he's the BPA on my board" he has traded down.

So he doesn't take BPA then?  What if there isn't good value in the trade?   Spot should command a high 3rd, but nobody is offering?  What if BPA fills a need but the Vikings are offering their next 3 first rounders?

 

It's ludicrous to say he only drafts BPA.    It's a complicated equation.

 

I think if you modify BPA to BPA for overall long term team development you're closer to the mark.  

Again saying BPA is half the sentence...Best Player Available for the Green Bay Packers is much more accurate. I never said he drafts BPA only,  I said need plays a part in it, but this idea he drafts *only* for need or that need is the deciding factor is silly. He takes the best player available for the GBP. People think he drafts for need at times because he takes a player that wasn't the BPA in their opinion, everyone's board is different. There is no ONE BPA.

I think trades can be factored in as the BPA also. If a team offers multiple picks (say Brainded's Draft Day 3 1st round picks scenario) then yeah that value is greater than any player slotted at that pick's value. A 2nd, a 3rd, and next years 1st probably have more value than this years 1st, no matter the need or the player.
Last edited by Grave Digger

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×