Skip to main content

@Floridarob posted:

Watsons dad speaks the truth but honestly is there any fan base that does not do exactly that. Cut and paste that comment for any team out there.

There is truth in what he says, and you are correct any fanbase does that for sure. Are we spoiled and some of us entitled as fans? oh absolutely we are but when our team for the majority of the last 30+ years has had some very good teams there will be expectations that come with it. 

I feel badly for Watson (especially with the ACL) and I think he has had some really bad luck with injuries.  I obviously know nothing behind the scenes, but I do question if he could have played in some games that he has missed.   

Behind a paywall, but according to Pete, this is the FA pass rusher that fits GB the best. Milton (Milty?!) fits both the right age, the right upside, and also won't cost a ton if the Packers pursue him.

Gives me Zadarius vibes (hopefully Milty has the right attitude) when Gute signed him off the Ravens. Smith was also a part-time pass rusher who was behind a talented DL with the Ravens at the time Gute snagged him.

Milton Williams, Philadelphia Eagles

If Gutekunst thinks he can get more bang for the free-agent buck from an inside rusher, Williams is probably the guy who’d interest him most. The Eagles’ free agent is young enough (26 in April) and coming off a season in which he had seven sacks in 21 games (playoffs included). He also finished third on the Eagles in pressures, behind Carter and Sweat.

Williams has been a part-time player and mainly a pass rusher who’s never played even 50% of the Eagles’ defensive snaps in a season. But his performance last season and in the playoffs could easily land him a contract in the range of $15 million a year.  

“Milton’s intriguing,” one of the scouts said. “He made plays for them, especially this year. He's essentially a backup for them, but he makes more plays than Jordan Davis. He deserves to be a starter, he deserves to get the money he’s going to get. I think he’ll be a good player, not one of those guys that made plays and then you pay him and he’s nothing.”

Myles Garrett, Maxx Crosby, Josh Sweat pass rushers Packers may pursue

@FLPACKER posted:

He doesn't start because he is awful vs the run

PFF RUN DEFENSE GRADE
43.1
167th of 219 DIs

There are plenty of good pass rushers across the league who aren't that great against the run so I am not sure that would be a deal breaker for Gute. It's much harder to find a guy who can pressure the QB on passing downs, shed his blocker and get to the QB. Right now, LVN is the opposite. He's been better against the run and can't seem to get to the QB.

Gute might also feel more comfortable pursuing a guy like WIlliams knowing Edge Cooper, Kenny Clark, and Gary are also along that DL to shore up the run defense.

They should return to not helping their teammates gain yardage. Remember this scene? Chuck Mercein said he didn't want to draw a penalty so he threw his arms in the air. I don't mind so much the scrums that happen when say an RB gets held up by the D and then the OL comes in to push the whole pile forward, but the tush push is more rugby than football. Three yards and a pile of players. At this point, what's to prevent two-thirds or a whole drive of only tush pushes?

Legendary NFL 'Ice Bowl' frozen in history books | Sports | spiritofjefferson.com

I see nothing wrong with the tush push.   You don’t like it figure out how to stop it.  

for a sneak you got 6 guys pushing back a qb twisting and turning so that an idiot ref calls the Qb short like when the Chiefs supposedly stopped Josh Allen short.  

The sneak turns into a scrum many times so why not let both sides  do it.

@Chongo posted:

Don’t care how fast you are if you can’t stay on the field it’s useless. Right now Watson is that guy. More potential than MVS but significantly less reliable.

Also Pops Watson suffers from some sort of mental illness. Let him scream at the clouds.

Agree.   He's got more value than MVS but not much.   Watson is a great kid, the kind of guy you want on your team.   The problem is he isn't built for this game like the true freaks.  He struggles with catching balls that are above his head and he is constantly dealing with soft tissue issues.   

I feel bad for him but that's just the way his career is going to play out.   Wish it wasn't so because he appears to be an all star human.

Oh yeah, didn't he have a super annoying sister too?   One that Beef would be drooling over?  So he has Jennings beat in that department at least.

@Fandame posted:

They should return to not helping their teammates gain yardage. Remember this scene? Chuck Mercein said he didn't want to draw a penalty so he threw his arms in the air. I don't mind so much the scrums that happen when say an RB gets held up by the D and then the OL comes in to push the whole pile forward, but the tush push is more rugby than football. Three yards and a pile of players. At this point, what's to prevent two-thirds or a whole drive of only tush pushes?

Legendary NFL 'Ice Bowl' frozen in history books | Sports | spiritofjefferson.com

Look at the mits on 64!  I never noticed that in this picture before.  I assumed they were all barehanded that day.

Schneidman speculating Packers move on from Josh Myers, move Sean Rhyan to C, keep Major Tom at RT, and start Morgan at RG.

If that's the scenario guessing they add another OL in the first 3 rounds to compete...a swing tackle, or perhaps a versatile interior OL who can also pinch hit at C...what they hoped Monk would be. Although maybe they think Monk will be that guy...Center 2.

Last edited by Chongo

What's been lost in the tush push is that it was an illegal play for decades and was changed in 2005. So it's not like we're taking out a part of the game that's been there forever.

I just think it's a boring play. Imagine a scenario where every team learns how efficient the play is and starts running it 20+ times per game. What if teams get inside the 10 yard line and just run 4 straight tush pushes to get into the endzone? Is that what we want from an entertainment perspective? I don't. And lost in sports is that it only exists to entertain.

@DH13 posted:

Look at the mits on 64!  I never noticed that in this picture before.  I assumed they were all barehanded that day.

Remember from the America's Game series on the 67 Packers. Lombardi didn't want anybody who might handle the ball wearing gloves.  Dave Robinson told the equipment guy to give him some brown gloves because Vince wouldn't know the difference!

Last edited by Packiderm
@CUPackFan posted:

What's been lost in the tush push is that it was an illegal play for decades and was changed in 2005. So it's not like we're taking out a part of the game that's been there forever.

I just think it's a boring play. Imagine a scenario where every team learns how efficient the play is and starts running it 20+ times per game. What if teams get inside the 10 yard line and just run 4 straight tush pushes to get into the endzone? Is that what we want from an entertainment perspective? I don't. And lost in sports is that it only exists to entertain.

While the human struggle part of it where you've got two masses of humanity trying to will the ball a couple feet or yards is appealing in its own right, there isn't really any strategy or skill to it.  This is where it loses me.  Football doesn't and has never simply boiled down to who is stronger or more massive.  It has always been a sport of skill and strategy and the tush push doesn't really have any of either.

@DH13 posted:

While the human struggle part of it where you've got two masses of humanity trying to will the ball a couple feet or yards is appealing in its own right, there isn't really any strategy or skill to it.  This is where it loses me.  Football doesn't and has never simply boiled down to who is stronger or more massive.  It has always been a sport of skill and strategy and the tush push doesn't really have any of either.

The scrum is the least interesting part of rugby for me...that's how I feel about the TP.

Also from the above link:

Overview

The Packers finish 7th overall, with the team receiving strong scores for their food/dining program along with their dietician, weight room, and training room. Last year, they upgraded the players’ meeting room and added an underground parking facility. Although these areas are not formally captured in the Report Cards, it demonstrates the team’s commitment to improve the players’ daily experience.

The most common area the players feel is in need of improvement is the locker room. While the space is sufficient, players believe it should be renovated and upgraded.

When asked what the team currently does best, players praise the team culture which is reflected in strong ratings for head coach Matt LaFleur and President/CEO Mark Murphy.

@Chongo posted:

Not happening with his current contract...no one taking on that much cap.

I think his redoing a contract with a new team wouldn't be nearly as big an issue as teams being leery of his health and his attitude.

Ja/Packers would need to show that Alexander is healthy and Ja would need to sell that he's focused and bought into wherever he'd go.

The innerwebs keep speculating about a Joe Bosa for Jaire Alexander trade from the Bolts. Bosa has similar injury concerns, a high contract, and it seems the Bolts have soured on Bosa much like GB has with Alexander.

Not holding my breath that happens, but it's an AFC opponent and each team could have interest in moving on.

Edit: Chargers send Joey Bosa to Packers in depressing trade proposal

Last edited by packerboi
@Chongo posted:

Not happening with his current contract...no one taking on that much cap.

Most decorated must mean most bandages.

@packerboi posted:

I think his redoing a contract with a new team wouldn't be nearly as big an issue as teams being leery of his health and his attitude.

Ja/Packers would need to show that Alexander is healthy and Ja would need to sell that he's focused and bought into wherever he'd go.

The innerwebs keep speculating about a Joe Bosa for Jaire Alexander trade from the Bolts. Bosa has similar injury concerns, a high contract, and it seems the Bolts have soured on Bosa much like GB has with Alexander.

Not holding my breath that happens, but it's an AFC opponent and each team could have interest in moving on.

Edit: Chargers send Joey Bosa to Packers in depressing trade proposal

Damn as much as like what Bosa has done in his career do you trade a CB with an injury history and a possible attitude problem for another player who has a similar if not worse injury track record and possible attitude problem?

I say they should do the best they can to fleece a desperate team like Jax to see what they can get at this point.

Listened to a lot of podcast opinions on the topic this morning. I think it was Rob Demovsky who polled different NFL execs and the compensation for Alexander ranged form a mid round (4th / 5th), to a late round, to nothing. So Hershal may be correct, a 4th rounder is probably best-case. As far as what we do at CB, Bukowski had some interesting observations. He thinks that although the Packers will address CB in Free Agency, it will not be a top line guy, and they will not use a top draft choice on the position either. He thinks resources will be maximized on getting an edge rusher first and then a WR.

@WolfPack posted:

1st round pick, Doubs and a day 2 pick. Yikes

Anyway to hold on to that R1 pick and swing it I'd be good





I'd love to see DK challenging Jaire in practice...

I read it as we give up #23 and either Doubs or Wicks, and get Metcalf and one of Seattle's early day 3 picks. In addition, it seems likely we are going to get a draft choice for Alexander.

@Boris posted:

If that's true, there's no way Metcalf is worth all that. He ain't Sterling Fucking Sharpe.

Don't worry though......let Gutey cook. He's a good negotiator.

Also.....trade Doubs? Ok ....not Wicks....NOT WICKS!! Why? Because not if....but WHEN he starts catching the ball, he's going to hit the next level. Y'all just watch

Let Gutey Cook? What are examples of well negotiated contracts? I'm not saying that it's never happened but I can't think of any off of the top of my head.

@13X posted:

Let Gutey Cook? What are examples of well negotiated contracts? I'm not saying that it's never happened but I can't think of any off of the top of my head.

Vets who got extended in GB over the past 2-3 years include Kenny Clark, Jordan Love, Rashan Gary, De'Vondre Campbell, Rasul Douglas, and Jaire Alexander.

Other than Love (hopefully), tough to argue that GB has gotten commensurate value out of any of these re-signings.

@Boris posted:

If that's true, there's no way Metcalf is worth all that. He ain't Sterling Fucking Sharpe.

Don't worry though......let Gutey cook. He's a good negotiator.

Also.....trade Doubs? Ok ....not Wicks....NOT WICKS!! Why? Because not if....but WHEN he starts catching the ball, he's going to hit the next level. Y'all just watch

Attachments

Images (1)
  • mceclip0
@SteveLuke posted:

Vets who got extended in GB over the past 2-3 years include Kenny Clark, Jordan Love, Rashan Gary, De'Vondre Campbell, Rasul Douglas, and Jaire Alexander.

Other than Love (hopefully), tough to argue that GB has gotten commensurate value out of any of these re-signings.

Yup. But Gutey is great. I would bet a lot of money that GB won’t win a title with him.

The problem at the WR position is the specific type of WR we need; 1) With our run game he can't be a smaller guy. We can only have one and that is Reed 2) He has to have the speed to make safeties have to play deep and open up the middle of the field for everyone else. There are really only two WRs (assuming Metcalf is available) that we right now may have a chance at that fit that description. Metcalf and MVS. Obviously Metcalf has done it at a significantly higher level than MVS has, and that it is why it would take a heck of a lot to get him. Adams is about the only  other option I see out there. Not a burner but can still win deep with technique. Like anything else it is about supply and demand, which leads to overpaying, which I think is likely.

@FLPACKER posted:

I bet even more money that even if we won the SB some people would still say Gutey and MLF suck.

And they could be undefeated and win it all and some would gripe and complain they didn't shut  everyone out by a score of 63-0.

I am probably in the minority but I would be ok if  they traded Doubs to Seattle.  The guy has had some injuries and IMHO Wicks has a better upside but that is probably just me.

Shadow, I looked it up and he  missed I think 5 games last year and one game in 23  but that is about it.   Of course because I said the he would immediately hurt his hammy  if comes to GB.

@Timmy! posted:

The Packers were able to calculate the 5th-year options for Walker and Wyatt yesterday.

Walker = $14.6M
Wyatt = $12.9M

The team has until May 2nd to exercise or decline.

As an owner, I recommend declining.

Prepare to be (somewhat) disappointed.

I think they'll try to re-sign Walker to a new deal prior to that at a lower yearly number but multiple years.

With Wyatt, they may want to ride out another year before extending him. That's not a bad price if they think they may want to extend him.

@The Heckler posted:

And they could be undefeated and win it all and some would gripe and complain they didn't shut  everyone out by a score of 63-0.



Reminds me of a story that Jim Valvano used to tell about when he got the NC State job and went to get a haircut. The barber asks him if he's the new basketball coach? He says he is , to which the barber replies "I hope you do better than ole Born did (Norm Sloan the previous coach)", Valvano replies "didn't his 1974 team go 30-1, win the ACC regular season, the ACC tournament, and the National Championship?"...the barber replies, "yeah , but think what Dean Smith could have done with that team" 

@FLPACKER posted:

Reminds me of a story that Jim Valvano used to tell about when he got the NC State job and went to get a haircut. The barber asks him if he's the new basketball coach? He says he is , to which the barber replies "I hope you do better than ole Born did (Norm Sloan the previous coach)", Valvano replies "didn't his 1974 team go 30-1, win the ACC regular season, the ACC tournament, and the National Championship?"...the barber replies, "yeah , but think what Dean Smith could have done with that team"

I'll defer to the basketball coach that FLPACKER is, but I always thought Dean Smith was the most overrated coach in history. Great recruiter, but I always thought the quote that "Dean Smith was the only guy who could hold Michael Jordan under 20" was very accurate.

Funny, I spent my first 7 years coaching high school in NC. Before moving there I was a big UNC fan, but after living it, I became less of one and became involved with Duke's program. Although I respected Smith for his organization and system, he did a number of things that showed his "saintly" facade to have cracks. I saw none of that with K during my years (87-97) of being around the program.

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×