Skip to main content

Linky

 

Quotes:

 

Josh Sitton is nearing elite status at left guard, T.J. Lang has been a competitive starter at the other guard for three years, left tackle David Bakhtiari showed promise as a rookie and Bryan Bulaga, with three years of starting service under his belt, is approaching the 12-month mark since his reconstructive knee surgery.

 

The Packers felt so good about JC Tretter's chances to be a capable center that they let Evan Dietrich-Smith walk to Tampa Bay for moderate money (four years, $7.25 million guaranteed) in mid-March even though salary-cap space was barely a consideration β€” Green Bay currently ranks eighth in cap room at $13.515 million.

 

"If the center position comes along we can have a very good line," Clements said. "He (Tretter) is working with the first group and doing a good job."

Good move. Tretter is the future of this team and will set the trend of prototypical centers for years to come. I'm ordering his jersey after my next paycheck.

 

It should be no surprise that the No. 1 group since 1999 was the 2003 fivesome of Chad Clifton (B-), Mike Wahle (A), Mike Flanagan (B+), Marco Rivera (A-) and Mark Tauscher (B-).

F**k Sugar Bear and Bert for wasting the tallant of that team. That was one of the best lines in the league and should have gotten a championship had it not been for INTs and the 2004 draft.

 

Entering his eighth season, Campen is the longest-tenured offensive line coach in Packers history. He surpasses Tom Lovat and Beightol, seven years as the head man, and Bill Austin and Ernie McMillan, six.

 

In fact, Campen's consecutive years of service atop the position will rank third in the league this year behind Cincinnati's Paul Alexander (20) and the New York Giants' Pat Flaherty (11).

 

Twenty of the 32 offensive line coaches this season will be in just their first or second years with their current team in their current position.

 

Not only has McCarthy spoken highly of Campen over the years, he and general manager Ted Thompson have denied permission for him to interview with other teams more than once.

 

"In all the aspects you'd evaluate an offensive-line coach, he's outstanding," Clements said. "I mean, he's very detailed. These guys obviously respect him because of his knowledge and they know that they'll be prepared.

 

"He's a good technician...an outstanding technician. He works on the things they need to work on. Having played the position, he can look at a defense and pick up some tips to help them out and understand what's coming."

 

Henry, thoughts?

Great ideas rooted in love.(R)

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Potential upgrades across the board on the OL:

 

2014 Bak vs 2013 Bak at LT

2014 Sherrod vs 2013 Bak at LT

 

2014 Tretter vs 2013 EDS at Center

 

2014 Sitton/Lang vs 2013 Sitton/Lang- more time to get used to the switch

 

2014 Bulaga vs 2013 Barclay at RT

 

GB has the potential to upgrade every spot on the OL going into this season

We'll see how many of them can achieve that goal

 

 

 

 

"  he and general manager Ted Thompson have denied permission for him to interview with other teams more than once."

 

Very interesting as this is the first time I've heard this. Assuming Campen even wanted to leave, that MM & TT blocked/denied permission to interview speaks much about their opinion of his abilities vs the typical fans who repeatedly call for his firing.

 

Calling BS on the Campen thoughts.
And the fact that Dom is still around after the defensive numbers(injuries be damned) speaks to continuity than anything else. I'm thinking MM likes what Campen preaches for his offense as a technician, so the "offensive coordinator" really not going to say bad things now after the commitment. My biggest beef with Campen is that he has probably had the loudest voice with changing guys positions, not sure that has been the best idea most of the time.
All jmo.
Originally Posted by Satori:

Potential upgrades across the board on the OL:

 

2014 Bak vs 2013 Bak at LT

2014 Sherrod vs 2013 Bak at LT

 

2014 Tretter vs 2013 EDS at Center

 

2014 Sitton/Lang vs 2013 Sitton/Lang- more time to get used to the switch

 

2014 Bulaga vs 2013 Barclay at RT

 

GB has the potential to upgrade every spot on the OL going into this season

We'll see how many of them can achieve that goal

 

 

 

 

Spot on as always sir.  One question.  Who developed all this talent?

Originally Posted by Pack-Man:

I'd really love to see what this offense could do if they had an OL that allowed less than 30 sacks in a season.

Watched an old packer game from the early 2000's and saw the time that faver had to throw - it was stunning in comparison to what we've seen in the recent past

 

2001-2004, GB gave up 19, 22, 26 and 12 sacks for an entire season

Lately we've been giving up 45,41,47 sacks

 

Better play from OTs and Center should help their cause along with a lethal running game.

 

As far as the development of these OL  guys ?

Duh. Its all Rodgers 

 

Wahle, Clifton, and Tauscher

 

vs.

 

EDS, Newhouse, and Barclay.

 

 

Shouldn't even be a competition.

 

 

Here's what I love about Tauscher. He doesn't just block the strongside.....he'd have been part of the best run blocking unit in team history. I forsee a long regimine for the Tretter era in GB.

Last edited by Rusty

Gotta have some context though Satori. Defenses played the early 2000's teams different than teams have played GB since Aaron Rodgers has been the QB. GB had a much more balanced attack in the height of those years compared to Aaron Rodgers tenure because of the running game. GB wasn't giving up sacks because Ahman was tearing it up and defenses weren't selling out against the pass like they do against GB now. The offensive line was very strong, but they were facing different challenges than the current group has faced. Actually this 2014 group should face similar challenges that the 2003 group faced because this backfield is arguably the best we have had since Ahman, Najeh, and Tony Fisher.

Originally Posted by Rusty:

Linky

 

 

Henry, thoughts?

 

Look at the grade out of oline during Campen's tenure.  Straight C's.  He's Dubya.  

 

Overcoming the coaching is the last hurdle for a olineman to prove they are legit on this team.  

 

He's the guy that doesn't make waves, does his reports, sucks the company dick, retires and is forgotten immediately.

 

High praise for these Olines is "stable".  

Last edited by Henry
Originally Posted by Grave Digger:

Gotta have some context though Satori. Defenses played the early 2000's teams different than teams have played GB since Aaron Rodgers has been the QB. 

Thanks, that's a great point GD.

 

And for you Campenfans; remember James was hired by... Mike Sherman

 

 

Last edited by Satori
Originally Posted by Pakrz:

  One question.  Who developed all this talent?

Well, here's my two cents on the titillating battle between you and Henry

 

Campen does develop talent, but he isn't special and therefore the results aren't special either. In the specific case of EDS, he was a try- hard guy with limited talent and a low ceiling that took 4 years to reach.  And EDS wasn't going to get any better as the trajectory for most NFL players has approached its apex by that point in their development. Now a very talented OL coach may have gotten a bit more out of EDS, but Campen isn't that guy. An average OL coach + an average player = surprisingly enough... AVERAGE and limited production.

 

And that's just not good enough for where GB wants to go so they let him walk. But only after drafting and working with Tretter for a season.

 

We're all going to be very pleased with the upgrade at Center and while there will most certainly be some bumps along the way, the payoff is there.

From what I have read, Tretter will surpass the EDS-apex sometime in October and continue to improve for the next couple seasons. His athleticism compares with some of the best Centers in the league( combine #s) and allows GB to run even more Power instead of ZBS, which fits perfectly in a Lacy-centric run game .

 

Additionally, with an up- tempo offense, Tretter's large brain moves him even further away from the EDS glass ceiling, giving GB what they want on the cerebral side too.

 

EDS was just a guy, Campen got about what you'd expect out of him and neither was good enough to overcome their own limitations.

 

Go Packers

Whether Sherrod makes this team this year will also probably say more about Campen then him.

 

Assuming he's healthy, he has all the physical tools and size you want out of a 1st round pick. And apparently the kid has a brain and is pretty smart.

 

But I have read more then a couple of blurbs thinking there is a strong possibility he doesn't make the cut.

 

 

Originally Posted by packerboi:
 

But I have read more then a couple of blurbs thinking there is a strong possibility he doesn't make the cut.

 

Well, you go tell those blurby blurbs they are full of it 

 

Who would be the back up at LT if you cut him ?

There isn't another one on the roster and its highly unlikely that the Packers would leave themselves completely unprotected at LT. No FAs were brought in, no LTs were drafted. That offers some hints about Derek's future in GB.

 

 

Originally Posted by Satori:
Originally Posted by packerboi:
 

But I have read more then a couple of blurbs thinking there is a strong possibility he doesn't make the cut.

 

Well, you go tell those blurby blurbs they are full of it 

 

Who would be the back up at LT if you cut him ?

There isn't another one on the roster and its highly unlikely that the Packers would leave themselves completely unprotected at LT. No FAs were brought in, no LTs were drafted. That offers some hints about Derek's future in GB.

 

 

 

Their hypothosis was Barclay and Linsley as back ups. And starters being Bacteria, Lang, Tretter, Sutton, and Bulaga. 7 OL in total. IIRC, those blurbs came out right after MM announced in OTA's that Don Barclay is a starting tackle in the NFL.

 

But it's entirely possible they keep 8. Agree with others, I am pulling for Sherrod too.

Originally Posted by michiganjoe:

Sherrod's got a year to prove himself, but beyond that is a big question mark. He didn't demonstrate that he was capable of playing at the NFL level prior to the injury and the team has to be unsure of what they have with him now. If they were feeling great about him they likely would have picked up the option year of his contract. 

 

The guy hasn't had any significant playing time.  I don' think that's a measure of being able to play at the NFL level.  At best, he was a rook and for the most part outside of knowing the playbook he's coming back as a rookie.  Plan and simple, it's now a question of being able to play after significant injuries.

 

I'm pulling for the guy.  I pulling for the whole damn line include Coach Flounder but I'm over the wishin' in one hand, **** in the other philosophy of measuring this oline.  Guys like Barclay and Bak are scrappers but I want to see a olineman, especially at T that dominates, not merely maintains.  I'd like to see a coach that can take a scrapper and add a second gear.  Point being, this will be a line that maintains and that will likely be enough with high powered offensive weapons.  It's as much balancing the payroll as it is the talent.  

 

If Tretter locks down the C position and a guy like Sherrod actually fulfills his potential, Buluga doesn't go all Shemp, this offense will be like Sherman's march to the sea.

Originally Posted by Henry:
  Guys like Barclay and Bak are scrappers but I want to see a olineman, especially at T that dominates, not merely maintains.

 

If Tretter locks down the C position and a guy like Sherrod actually fulfills his potential, Buluga doesn't go all Shemp, this offense will be like Sherman's march to the sea.

Concur on all counts

 

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×