Skip to main content

Originally Posted by antiworst:
Originally Posted by bubbleboy789:

if you think that the Packers would not be winning or at least tied right now if AR was playing you are full of ****. 


Then the "draft and develop" is an epic failure. If ONE guy goes down and you can't win, then something is wrong.

That's the modern NFL. The game has become so focused on QBs and passing that it's virtually impossible to win without one. Just 10 years ago, you could still win with an old Brad Johnson or Trent Dilfer. Those days are dead and buried.

Originally Posted by antiworst:

"That's the modern NFL. The game has become so focused on QBs and passing that it's virtually impossible to win without one."

 

Then someone should send the memo to the Eagles and the Bears, because they've just won again this week after beating us the last two games with their backup QBs.

Foles looks to be a legitimate starter, and the Ravens just suck. They're the worst defending Super Bowl champ since the '99 Broncos (and at least they had the excuse of losing Elway and Terrell Davis).

Originally Posted by antiworst:
Originally Posted by bubbleboy789:

if you think that the Packers would not be winning or at least tied right now if AR was playing you are full of ****. 


Then the "draft and develop" is an epic failure. If ONE guy goes down and you can't win, then something is wrong.

If you think about it, the Giants have only put up 20 points on offense. I think Rodgers could've put up at least that. That's all I'm saying. 

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×