Interesting breakdown on how GB gets in rather than Seattle with a win....
"Which takes us to the seldomly used "strength of victory” decider, which is above “strength of schedule” in the pecking order. Seattle has a more difficult strength of schedule, but Green Bay’s opponents’ combined win-loss record clears the Seahawks.
Green Bay Packers wins
Detroit Lions (11-5)
Kansas City Chiefs (10-6)
Los Angeles Rams (9-7)
New Orleans Saints (8-8)
Minnesota Vikings (7-9)
Chicago Bears (7-9)
Los Angeles Chargers (5-11)
Carolina Panthers (2-14)
Total record: 59-69 (.461)
Seattle Seahawks wins
Philadelphia Eagles (11-5)
Detroit Lions (11-5)
Cleveland Browns (11-5)
Tennessee Titans (5-11)
New York Giants (5-11)
Washington Commanders (4-12)
Arizona Cardinals (4-12)
Carolina Panthers (2-14)
Total record: 53-75 (.414)
No combination of results this weekend can overcome that six-game gap, so don’t entertain that “what-if?” if you were going that route. The Seahawks indeed are one of the few teams that can boast a trio of wins over 10+ win squads, but the tiebreaker works out in such a way that beating, say, the Ravens (13-3) and not the Titans would’ve actually been better. Stacking victories against the bottom four teams in the NFC might be good for the win column but it’s poison for SOV. Funnily enough, only two NFC teams have a SOV at or above .500: Arizona and Carolina. Go figure."