Skip to main content

@michiganjoe posted:

In other words, he thinks he can make more new money from another team than the Packers offered him when they likely approached him to restructure his contract.

Is he in New York yet? I know many posters here have argued he will never play home games on that crappy turf, but I think he's going there.

He'll probably look like a superstar LT for about 4-5 games wherever he goes and then have to sit out a large part of the season when an injury flares up.

Guessing David B ends up on a grass-field team and will most likely choose a  contender.

There are some NFL fields with high- tech turf that may get consideration, like Chargers/Rams at SoFi.

Here is the full list of stadiums that use real grass at their venues:

Team(s)StadiumTurf or grass
Arizona CardinalsState Farm StadiumGrass
Baltimore RavensM&T Bank StadiumGrass
Chicago BearsSoldier FieldGrass
Cleveland BrownsFirstEnergy StadiumGrass
Denver BroncosEmpower Field at Mile HighGrass
Green Bay PackersLambeau FieldGrass
Jacksonville JaguarsTIAA Bank FieldGrass
Kansas City ChiefsArrowhead StadiumGrass
Las Vegas RaidersAllegiant StadiumGrass
Miami DolphinsHardRock StadiumGrass
Philadelphia EaglesLincoln Financial FieldGrass
Pittsburgh SteelersAcrisure StadiumGrass
San Francisco 49ersLevi's StadiumGrass
Tampa Bay BuccaneersRaymond James StadiumGrass
Washington CommandersFedEx Field

Grass

@Boris posted:

You think he's actually going to play this year??

Play and play well -  that's my expectation for #69 in 2024.

Hope it all works out for him, he's a 5- star class A human.

More knee details here from Bak last fall, somehow I missed this session with reporters

https://www.packers.com/news/d...ee-injury-his-future

"I hate it. I know the club hates it. It's just not a great situation for anyone to deal with," Bakhtiari said. "The human side of it took a little of stress, a lot of time on my end, but the clarity is to know we finally know what the problem is, and we can address the problem. That's the, I guess, glass-half-full part of the scenario. So, that's where we're at. That's the pill I have to swallow."

Bakhtiari said doctors only extracted about 10-15% of his lateral meniscus during the initial surgery to repair his ACL, but discomfort and fluid buildup remained an issue when he played.

Because of that, Bakhtiari established, and then reset, an unofficial locker-room record for having more than 160 CCs – roughly 5.4 ounces – of fluid removed from the knee this year.

He played well in the opener against Chicago but was shut down again after his knee flared up in response to his 55 snaps. Upon a consultation with team physician Dr. Pat McKenzie and specialists nationwide, it finally became clear Bakhtiari needed to address an issue with his lateral femur.

Doctors knew there was damage to the femoral condyles, the two rounded prominences at the end of the femur, when Bakhtiari's ACL injury first occurred, but there was no indication it would affect him moving forward.

"In my knee, it's basically like sandpaper where it rubs, it's just not smooth, which is creating a lot of fluid," Bakhtiari said. "I've been dealing (with) a lot of effusion for a long time, and that's where you see the constant, I'm in and then I'm out, I'm out and then I'm in. We wanted to make sure that we could address every possible way to not do it because we understood what the surgery has to be."

When asked why go through it again, Bakhtiari thought about the question for a second before speaking directly from the heart.

"Because I'm different," Bakhtiari said. "I have an unparalleled work ethic. I'm stubborn as (heck) and I'm not gonna let someone else write my story. This is me just taking control of what I need to do. When I want to look back, do I want to look at the guy who got injured and was like ah, that's good enough? If that's not me, then the future, older me is gonna be (ticked) at the younger me."

Good luck !

I have no doubt Bakh wants to play and will do all he can to get onto and stay on the field for whatever team he plays for. I also have no doubt GB knew realistically what that wrecked knee looks like and that in their mind, there's no way he'd last anywhere near a full season ever again. It's a young man's game and the Packers correctly moved on.

Father time is undefeated. Don't care how many peptides you take, how hard you work, how much rest and recover you do, how much anti-inflammatory diet you consume.

Best of luck to him...I think the Packers chose wisely.

I'm sure there are lots of teams that have some degree of interest, but I think it has to depend on what Daktari will accept for a salary.
HIs days of $20M+/year are over, so will he play for 10% of that?

I still think there is a possibility he would reunite with Rodgers in NY.
I also think he likely would want to play for a "contender" at this point in his career, so that eliminates at least half of the teams in the league.
The teams that drafted OTs in the 1st or 2nd round eliminates a few more teams.
And I haven't mentioned the grass vs turf factor yet.
Trying to line up limited choices, salary, and opportunity might be difficult to do.

What do you all think about him going to a team like the Raiders, Chargers, Bills, Bengals? Maybe the Rams or Seahawks? Ditto the Falcons or Giants.
Just as long as it's not one of our division rivals...
Teams (other than perhaps the Raiders) that are already established, but need a little extra to get some playoff success. Or teams that have new HCs, new or still young QBs?

Its getting to be that time...when Bak has a choice to make

My guess = Chiefs

Contender, plays on grass, progressive coach, top QB and they have some other LT options in case things go south on Bak's return to play. Reid is more than willing to gamble on risky moves to achieve greatness

We should be hearing something soon as the Battle of Wounded Knee reaches its exciting next chapter.

@Goalline posted:

More likely it will come after the season starts so they don’t have to guarantee his contract,

That's exactly how they handled it in years' past, especially for depth vets who still commanded a high salary. Now with void years, veteran benefits and other cap manipulations, teams don't sign as many guys after game 1.
You can go through the transactions from Sept of 2023 to see how few high priced vets were signed right after week 1

https://www.pro-football-refer.../09_transactions.htm



What teams do now is use the Veteran Benefit clause of the latest CBA which allows teams to sign a 10+ year vet like Bak, but he only counts as a 2 year vet for cap purposes. They are allowed a small signing bonus as well. NFLPA wanted this clause so vets didn't always lose out to cheaper young guys.

Then teams add per-game bonuses as a way for Bak to recoup some of the dollars he's worth and to offer protection to the team if things go sideways. Packers did this with Nick Perry's contract and several other vets where re-injury was a significant concern. Teams can push some of it into void years if they need to

The reason teams will take a chance on David is because there just aren't enough quality OTs to staff a 32 team league. Take a stroll through some of the dreck teams are rolling out there on Sundays. Marshall Newhouse played 10 years in the league. We're totally spoiled on the OL compared to most teams

https://www.ourlads.com/nfldep...rts/depthchartpos/OT

End of the day, the team MDs will make the call and they have the skills and experience to make such an assessment - as opposed to all the orthopedic specialists posting here at X4...

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×