Haha and Burnett have to be among the top safety duos in the league right now. Now if only the DBs would step up their games, I could see GB's defense cracking the the top 5 easily.
The difference between wk1 preseason and wk4 preseason is stunning. Looks like two different guys.
Don't even recognize that QB from 2005. Was it 2007 when he came in for Favre against the Cowboys and played so well?
michiganjoe posted:Don't even recognize that QB from 2005. Was it 2007 when he came in for Favre against the Cowboys and played so well?
I was at that game, first and last time I got to see Favre play in person. Didn't even last to halftime.
Dallas game in 2007 wasnt the only game Rodgers needed to replace Favre.
I was also at the game. Can't change the past but even MM thought about replacing Favre at halftime of the NFC CG
I just know we gotta bring the white shoes back.
Brainwashed Boris posted:I was also at the game. Can't change the past but even MM thought about replacing Favre at halftime of the NFC CG
I was also at that game, freezing my tail off. Will never forget the somber silence of 70,000 people walking away from that game in the dark through nearby neighborhoods, occasionally someone breaking the silence with a shouted obscenity.
Favre's last pass as a Packer was certainly worthy of an obscenity.
YA, I was referring to the Dallas 2007 game - in Dallas. Chilli was referring to the "other game" Favre should've been yanked (NFC CG vs. Giants)
Oh.
It's odd to me that no one is talking about CMatthews. One of my biggest concerns about the season is that he will go from being an asset to a liability. Does anyone else feel that way?
Yep, Clay could go either way and I wouldn't be surprised.
Clay won't be a liability if he's on the field (and healthy). He's either going to be really good this year or really injured and miss extended time. I don't see a middle ground with him.
If he misses extended time this year or if he's trying to play at 50% for prolonged stretches again then it's probably time to look at closing the book on Clay.
Closing the book on Clay? Injuries have taken their toll that's for sure but hope he can play.
Don't worry we have Biegel AND King instead of Watt. Oh wait Biegel is hurt? King has looked "OK?"
Dear football gods do not let TJ Watt play well.
If CMIII misses any significant time this D is ****ed. Zero margin for error as has been the case the last 3-4 years. Ugh
Hard to argue with this..
Rob DemovskyVerified account @RobDemovsky 9h LaDarius Gunter's fall from No. 1 to No. 5 (at best) shows Packers CBs are better
True, but the reason he was #1 last year was due to injuries - Shields, Randall, Rollins all missed time or where slowed by injury. With Gunter's molasses like speed, only reason he was on the opposing #1 is because he could change direction somewhat quickly.
The Packers should find a spot for 6-foot-6 rookie WR Michael Clark, even if it's just on the practice squad. Just made another leaping, outstretched catch for a 20-yard TD from Taysom Hill over Davon House.
Rob Demovsky, ESPN Staff Writer
Taysom Hill just threw one of the prettiest balls you'll see to Michael Clark, who high-points it for a 20-TD TD #Packers
— Wes Hodkiewicz (@WesHod) August 29, 2017
Taysom Hill taking third-string snaps ahead of Joe Callahan. Throws a 20-yard TD to Clark over House on first snap.
— Tom Silverstein (@TomSilverstein) August 29, 2017
I think both are keepers; it's just a matter of finding spots, whether it's PS, 53, or even IR. Clark is so raw but I love what he's shown so far with his reach and ability to pluck the ball out of tough spots. And you can't say that often about guys who are 6'6". Hill is just a gamer. Reminds me of a guy who will do anything he can to win. May not be the biggest, fastest, strongest, but his heart is huge.
But he's pretty fast and pretty strong. Not just a try hard guy, got a lot a tools to work with.
No room for three QBs.
Attachments
Those jerseys could be considered camouflage.
bvan posted:Yep, Clay could go either way and I wouldn't be surprised.
Absolutely. If I was a betting man (and there was no vig) I'd put money on it.
bvan posted:Yep, Clay could go either way and I wouldn't be surprised.
He never struck me as being bisexual.
We don't judge.
Snowflake.
It needed to be made. pic.twitter.com/VcHvPAzZpr
— Zach Rapport (@ZachRapport) August 18, 2017
that's great, love it! thanks H5
Packers welcome back luncheon took place today. Rodgers (once again) didn't disappoint.
Another movie reference! Yay Dragnet!