This defense....
This defense is not playoff caliber right now. They still are going to make the playoffs, but it might not be pretty.
Should throw a flag there for excessive rushing the QB.
Any thoughts of this being a blowout are out the window.
R MaN posted:17-13 Pack
You must be mistaken.
Z. Smith is the guy that makes plays every week. Imagine what this defense would be without him.
Now the offense needs a drive for 7 to get the Giants down 2 scores again.
Right now Rodgers needs to get hot on the cold field.
Told ya this wouldn't be easy.....
Good thing they signed him and that other guy with 10 sacks.
Henry posted:Timpranillo posted:Henry posted:Timpranillo posted:I do not understand this offense.
Agreed.
Hackett Ball?
Thinking more and more this is Rodgers ball. The focus is on home runs that minimize all chance at an INT.
The best plays so far have been Lazard sandlot throws. I get the overall frustration, I think something is off as well.
I'm mostly serious here, is Rodgers worth it then? I can't make that distinction until there's some real WR talent on the field.
They're winning. It isn't satisfying but I remember some choad telling me "any win is satisfying". Lots of choad screeds since then.
Well you made the point about rbs in the pass game. Short high pct throws even if they gain 3-4 yards help an offense find rhythm. Why are they pissing away downs and facing 3rd and long all day? The lack of tallant at WR wasn't keeping them from making positive plays while Adams was out. Nine minutes TOP in the first half is begging a 2-9 team to beat you. This is a pattern and it shows up the worst against teams like SF. But the pattern is repeating itself against garbage teams that GB should be handling. It sets the other 2 units back as well.
15:21 to 6:03 time of possession since the Packers went up 17-7
Nice move Adams. How can you dispute that as a catch? Moron announcers.
MichiganPacker2 posted:Now the offense needs a drive for 7 to get the Giants down 2 scores again.
I'm truly not trying to be anymore abrasive than usual but this is now the standard? If they aren't up by two scores they suck?
Boris posted:Told ya this wouldn't be easy.....
Didn't you tell us the Packers were going to beat SF handily?
We keep faking the sweep on a run play. We might actually want to try it more than once.
Henry posted:MichiganPacker2 posted:Now the offense needs a drive for 7 to get the Giants down 2 scores again.
I'm truly not trying to be anymore abrasive than usual but this is now the standard? If they aren't up by two scores they suck?
Against a shitty team like the Giants?
Yup....I was Rong but I'm right about today.
Rodgers out of the shotgun pass interference gmen
1st down GB
3rd and manageable again... and AR throws the ball way the F down the field again.
Bailed out by a flag. I'm convinced this is all AR, not LaFluffer.
The lack of utilizing the middle of the field is just baffling to me.
Against a BOZO team with a lot of starters out the Packers are looking mighty mundane.
D sucking, Pack seems famous in that if the ioposing team han a long and third, it is almost a guarantee they will make it FUCK this bend dont break Dom clone of adefense--same shit different day--pettine needs a knot jerked in his ass or a run down the road.
NOW, this offense--Yes it is offensive-- seems as if MLF got the offensive part of Fat Boys brain cause I dont see anything that affords the Pack any offensive surprise, trickery or advantage against even a slightly decent offense LET ALONE a good defense.
First year, I understand BUT MLF sure better do some soul searching, talent evaluating and make use of the free agent market and the drafe to get some more top tier playser
MichiganPacker2 posted:Bailed out by a flag again.
Why all the home runs?
Because FYTW.