And just like that Jones loses two on a run.. :-|
Hungry5 posted:Henry posted:Serious question, would everyone here shift the offensive focus away from Rodgers to the run game.
Discuss.
Absolutely.
Maybe not.
Henry posted:Serious question, would everyone here shift the offensive focus away from Rodgers to the run game.
Discuss.
Yep.
Third and long , our weakness? No, lizard slips through
ammo posted:#13, our new #1 WR.
Wait until Rodgers starts locking in on him.
Pakrz posted:Henry posted:Serious question, would everyone here shift the offensive focus away from Rodgers to the run game.
Discuss.
Yep.
Discuss
Hungry5 posted:Hungry5 posted:Henry posted:Serious question, would everyone here shift the offensive focus away from Rodgers to the run game.
Discuss.
Absolutely.
Maybe not.
Definitely not.
Timpranillo posted:I do not understand this offense.
Agreed.
Hackett Ball?
Fedya posted:Oooooh, Ya Tittie has finally shown up....
He's been here 10 minutes----he just had to go back to page 1 to "like" every post.
Freak.
Timpranillo posted:I do not understand this offense.
It's not easy scoring against the New York football Giants
Henry posted:Timpranillo posted:I do not understand this offense.
Agreed.
Hackett Ball?
Thinking more and more this is Rodgers ball. The focus is on home runs that minimize all chance at an INT.
Between the 18 play drive by the Giants in the 2nd quarter, the conservative play calling on the end of the 1st half drive, and this first drive; the Packers have 11 plays for 35 yards the last 15 minutes of actual game time.
Another serious question. Did anyone think this team would be 8-3 at this point before the season started hence some of the epic hissies (no shame/blame)? I honestly blame all of this on PTSD (Post Tramatic Seattle Disorder).
Henry posted:Pakrz posted:Henry posted:Serious question, would everyone here shift the offensive focus away from Rodgers to the run game.
Discuss.
Yep.
Discuss
I have.. in multiple different threads. Rodgers amounts to a good NFL quarterback on average, definitely not consistently elite any longer although he has his moments. He's not good enough any longer to just line up and smoke defenses.
Even his commercials suck compared to his glory years
I remember when Bert lost Sharpe. No choice but to spread the ball. Rodgers got his Sharpe back and has love only for him.
Timpranillo posted:I do not understand this offense.
Nobody does.
Timpranillo posted:Henry posted:Timpranillo posted:I do not understand this offense.
Agreed.
Hackett Ball?
Thinking more and more this is Rodgers ball. The focus is on home runs that minimize all chance at an INT.
The best plays so far have been Lazard sandlot throws. I get the overall frustration, I think something is off as well.
I'm mostly serious here, is Rodgers worth it then? I can't make that distinction until there's some real WR talent on the field.
They're winning. It isn't satisfying but I remember some choad telling me "any win is satisfying". Lots of choad screeds since then.
Here’s a thought. Go to hurry up offense next drive. Just to try something different. Exploit a matchup. Something other than snapping the ball with 1 second left every goddamned play.
Pikes Peak posted:Even his commercials suck compared to his glory years
Poor Goldie.
Just horrible. Getting scorched over and over on 3rd down.
No excuse for A 3 and 12 completion
