Skip to main content

The Chicago Bears drive in Green Bay on the heels of a very successful first offseason by new General Manager Phil Emery. Emery has spent the majority of his career with the Chiefs prior to his hiring by the Bears earlier this year.

The former GM who shall remain nameless is gone and his idealogies crushed. After watching the team completely fall apart after a strong start (7-3) he was let go for a lack of depth behind the starters. Not only did the Bears of 2011 have a chance to win more games, but they blew an opportunity to make the playoffs and seek revenge on their main rivals, the Green Bay Packers.

Bears brass was pissed, the fans were pissed and one would have to assume the defensive leaders were pissed as well. Urlacher, Tillman, Peppers and Briggs are are aging quickly and that might have been their last opportunity. Until, of course, the Bears filled the GM position with promise of hope and change.

Enter Phil Emery. A scouts scout. Someone who claimed he spent more time on the road than the head of his scouting department. This is not what Bears fans wanted to hear. We were tired of cutesy borderline Division Two players and a complete abandonment of the offense.

Emery also said he likes big receivers. Enter Brandon Marshall. When his head is on right, he's a top five WR in the league. He brings a physicality to the position the Bears haven't ever had before. He is the best WR the Bears have ever had. If that wasn't enough, he moved up in the second round to draft Alshon Jeffrey. Rated with the best hands in the draft (You mean he's not a converted Arena league CB?) but fell because of poor numbers in his last season. Could have been because they lost their QB and had to go to a true freshman mid season...naw, that couldn't be it. Not only has Jeffrey caught everything in camp, preseason and against the Colts, he's as humble as pie on the 4th of July.

Okay, that's great, but what about the rest of the offense? How about Jason Campbell backing up Cutler? How about Michael Bush signed for four years with ONLY seven million guaranteed? Talk about talented backups.

Of course, not everything is lollipops and gumballs. The Bears Oline is still just as terrible as it ever was. As Green Bay continues to get stronger on the front seven with high draft choices such as Perry and Worthy, Emery stood pat on the Oline at the request of his promoted from within offensive coordinator Mike Tice.

Tice should be an improvement over Martz. Even the MSM bashes Martz to this day about his time in Chicago. Tice likes big WR's and Alshon and Marshall are both over 6'3. His quotes about the offensive line are optimistic and tough, but it's the same garbage they trotted out last year, save for a couple of FA scrub back ups. The hope for Bears fans everywhere is that Tice will move Cutler around in the pocket and eliminate plays that don't work. So far, so good.

So, with an improved offense and a steady defense, the Bears pack their lunch and head to Green Bay. The road to the playoffs and the NFC North titles still runs through them.

Bears D VS Packers O

McCarthy has had our number lately. The display last winter was laughable. Not much has changed for the Packers except Driver is on the way out and Cobb has a year of experience under his belt. Dangerous. Cedric Benson is a concern but it all depends on how pass happy MM gets.

Defensively, Urlacher is healthy and the Bears got a little bit younger up front. Big Shea was Emery's first draft pick. Some say he's out of position but he's played great so far. Great spin move and unrelenting motor. He might only perfect his spin move more this year as he needs to put on some muscle to really make a impact. He's the nickel DE and liability in the run game, for now.

Henry Melton in the DT that will push Green Bays FA Saturday around the field like a rag doll. Dude was a FB at UT and is explosive and powerful. He will not let QB's step up and side step Peppers any longer.

Despite Lovie Smiths long history of defensive coordinating and work in the secondary, there are still questions back there. Chris Conte, safety, is a 2nd year player who is as smart as he is quick, but lacks experience. Tim Jennings is the #2 CB and he's undersized but a play maker. Emery signed Kelvin Hayden as the #3 CB in the offseason and has filled the role decently so far.

The Packers O will score points on this aging defense but there is a good mix of playmakers and young talent. The Bears D will force at least three turnovers.

Bears O VS Packers D

Woodsen at Safety is gong to be tough for the Bears O. While I contend he's a dirty player and punk, he is cerebral and will cause some confusion early for Jay Cutler. Bush is the one to take advantage of. I witnessed Perry get fooled several times against the 49ers and Mike Tice will use trickery and misdirection to the Bears benefit.

Clay Matthews registered 2.5 sacks against one the the best LT's in the game yeterday and on Thursday he will be going against the worst in J'Marcus Webb. Dude gets turned more than Henrys Mom at the local cheese fair.

Although...the combination of Forte and Bush will prove to be a challenge to the Packers. Bush is more than a power back and Forte is in the best shape of his life. Marshall will be too much for Bush and Alshon is STILL flying under the radar. Look for a lot of rollouts and PA once the ground game has bee established.

Bears 35
Fudgies 31
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

quote:
Originally posted by DeepChicago:
If that wasn't enough, he moved up in the second round to draft Alshon Jeffrey. Rated with the best hands in the draft (You mean he's not a converted Arena league CB?) but fell because of poor numbers in his last season. Could have been because they lost their QB and had to go to a true freshman mid season...naw, that couldn't be it.


You're right, that couldn't be it. Shaw was a sophomore last year.

That said, not happy Jeffrey is a Bear.
‏@BradBiggs
Gerald Wright will serve as the referee for #Bears #Packers on Thursday night at Lambeau Field

@BradBiggs
Presumably, Wright leads one of the higher-graded replacement ref outfits. His crew worked Steelers-Broncos in prime time Sunday night
quote:
Originally posted by Brak:
quote:
Originally posted by DeepChicago:
If that wasn't enough, he moved up in the second round to draft Alshon Jeffrey. Rated with the best hands in the draft (You mean he's not a converted Arena league CB?) but fell because of poor numbers in his last season. Could have been because they lost their QB and had to go to a true freshman mid season...naw, that couldn't be it.


You're right, that couldn't be it. Shaw was a sophomore last year.

That said, not happy Jeffrey is a Bear.



My bad, I just knew it was a first time starter.

Where are you predictions? I already see some of you clowns getting ready to blame the refs!!!
quote:
Originally posted by DeepChicago:
But the clowns here are the ones who bring it up all the time.


So, if/when the replacement ref's, who can't handle the speed of a regular season game misses a hold on Brandon Marshall or misses a false start on GB or calls a weak pass INT on one of your offensive players you'll be sitting mum right? Because class act as a Bears fan are you won't stoop to the low level of a Packer fan and express your thoughts on these ref's who aren't ready for primetime?

Case you haven't noticed the job of an NFL fans non-stop never ending whining about ref's was actually taken by Viking fans years ago. Few fans of any other team can come close to that or ever will.

The posts here on bad calls expressed frustration on both sides of the ball. SF got jobbed on some calls as well. And no Packer player or coach was blaming any call or non-call as the reason they lost. None.

Packers 24 Bears 20. Aaron Rodgers despite a QB rating of 93 in week one will be looking to redeem himself. Him not having his best game probably not the thing the Bears will want to deal with in week 2.
quote:
Originally posted by DeepChicago:
quote:
Originally posted by Herschel:
How can we make a prediction until we know if MiniDitka will be on the field?



MiniDikta is ALWAYS on the field.


CRAP! Bears eleventy billion, Packers 3.

I'll actually go Packers 34 - Bears 30 in shootout.
The talent gap between the Bears and Packers is narrower than it has been in years, but I just don't trust Cutler to beat the Packers at Lambeau. If the Bears are smart, they’ll let Forte and Bush do the heavy lifting in this one. The threat of Cutler to Marshall/Jeffrey will open up some running lanes, but the ever-present threat of a Cutler brain fart (a’la Sunday’s pick-six beauty) leads me to believe...

Packers 31 Bears 24

B-N-D
First salvo.
quote:

I already see some of you clowns getting ready to blame the refs!!!


Packers stuff Bears run game and run effectively themselves in the 2nd half. Rodgers does not have 2 sub par games in a row.

Packers: 33
Bears: 20
Blueprint has been formed & Packers window has slammed shut after 1 game.

Bears 27
Packers 22

In a game that's not even close. Bears dominate & Pack gets 2 gift garbage time TD's.
You started out with a decent enough assesment, Deep, but lost a bit of control early. I definitely have a different opinion of some of your players, but that's to be expected as opposite fans.

Marshall might be a Top-10 WR, but he's surely not Top-5 or better. When he's on his game, he can be very good, but his consistency comes and goes.
Jefferey had a decent debut, but I see nothing to fear in him.
Cutler is similar to Marshall as far as consistency. He can be good, but more often he's not.
Campbell is an experienced back-up, but that doesn't make him good. I'd dare say he's better than what you've had over the last couple of years or so.
Bush was a good signing, but he's not a world-beater by any means.
Urlacher is playing, but he's not healthy.
Melton...who?

The only prediction I'll make for now is that I expect to see a healthy dose of Forte and Bush. Until the Packers show they can stop the rush, teams are going to pound it, and the Bears should be just as good, if not better, that the 49ers RB's. And, of course, if you guys are able to sustain drives and limit opportunities for our offense, that would play to your strengths.
I also expect to see the same short-to-intermediate passes that seem to work against our defense, especially if we're going to try to cover Marshall or Jeffery with LB's.
Unless there's just a complete breakdown, I don't think the Bears can stretch the field. There's no telling what we're going to do at CB opposite Williams, but I don't think there's time to make an immediate switch for Bush. Assuming Cutler has the time, that may be the position you would target.
I can actually see our pass rush having an affect vs your O-line. The best way to minimize Matthews, our blitzes, and push from guys like Raji or Perry is 3 step-drop plays, and the aforementioned running game. With Martz, we could count on him trying to force the ball deep; now, I tend to doubt that will happen.

Obviously, any sucess we have on offense depends on our O-line. If (and that's a mighty big if!) ARod has the time, we should be able to light it up all day long. After yesterday's game, I don't know what the hell to expect. I'm sure we will try often enough, but whether there's any success remains to be seen.
Until I see otherwise, I can't expect us to having any production from rushing the ball. Not only is our blocking suspect, that would seem to play to the strongest part of your defense.

In the end, I do expect another too-close-for-comfort game that won't be decided until late in the game. As always, it could come down to a turnover, a big ST play, or a FG.
We will also have to consider the potential influence to the game from the refs. I still expect to be a lot of missed holding calls, and PI calls can be bewildering, but the best we can hope for is consistency in their calls.
The Packers need to have a better game plan than they did against SF. Take what the bears give. If the deep routes aren't there then go to the west coast style offense using guys like Green, Cobb, Finely, Jennings, Driver. Forget the running game.

We don't want to be 0-2 to start. Not good, considering they are both NFC opponents.
Our defense just got carved, stuffed and served up for dinner by Alex Smith. Historically, Capers has done a good job against Cutler, but it goes without saying that the defense needs to...adapt in order us to have any chance.

Seeing Cobb come out of the backfield so often was awesome. With so many teams playing deep zones against us, it's nice to have a guy who can run quick, short routes underneath and make defenders miss in the open field.

Packers have given up over 30 points in each of their last home games. Even with our offense, it's tough to win when that happens.

Bears - 37
Packers - 38
This should be a really interesting game. The Colts are just a bad team, so it's hard to know how much to read into that game. The Bears D looks a little old and frail. As bad as the Packer's D has been though, I'm not convinced the brain trust of Mike Tice and whoever they hired to remind him how the forward pass works in between plays are going to draw up much of a game plan to exploit them.

I think the Packers offense will bounce back after their sloppy performance and slice 'em up for a fairly comfortable win. I'm sure there will be some groan worthy moments where Brandon Marshall is left completely uncovered along the way though.
quote:
Originally posted by Timmy!:
You started out with a decent enough assesment, Deep, but lost a bit of control early. I definitely have a different opinion of some of your players, but that's to be expected as opposite fans.

Marshall might be a Top-10 WR, but he's surely not Top-5 or better. When he's on his game, he can be very good, but his consistency comes and goes.
Jefferey had a decent debut, but I see nothing to fear in him.
Cutler is similar to Marshall as far as consistency. He can be good, but more often he's not.
Campbell is an experienced back-up, but that doesn't make him good. I'd dare say he's better than what you've had over the last couple of years or so.
Bush was a good signing, but he's not a world-beater by any means.
Urlacher is playing, but he's not healthy.
Melton...who?

The only prediction I'll make for now is that I expect to see a healthy dose of Forte and Bush. Until the Packers show they can stop the rush, teams are going to pound it, and the Bears should be just as good, if not better, that the 49ers RB's. And, of course, if you guys are able to sustain drives and limit opportunities for our offense, that would play to your strengths.
I also expect to see the same short-to-intermediate passes that seem to work against our defense, especially if we're going to try to cover Marshall or Jeffery with LB's.
Unless there's just a complete breakdown, I don't think the Bears can stretch the field. There's no telling what we're going to do at CB opposite Williams, but I don't think there's time to make an immediate switch for Bush. Assuming Cutler has the time, that may be the position you would target.
I can actually see our pass rush having an affect vs your O-line. The best way to minimize Matthews, our blitzes, and push from guys like Raji or Perry is 3 step-drop plays, and the aforementioned running game. With Martz, we could count on him trying to force the ball deep; now, I tend to doubt that will happen.

Obviously, any sucess we have on offense depends on our O-line. If (and that's a mighty big if!) ARod has the time, we should be able to light it up all day long. After yesterday's game, I don't know what the hell to expect. I'm sure we will try often enough, but whether there's any success remains to be seen.
Until I see otherwise, I can't expect us to having any production from rushing the ball. Not only is our blocking suspect, that would seem to play to the strongest part of your defense.

In the end, I do expect another too-close-for-comfort game that won't be decided until late in the game. As always, it could come down to a turnover, a big ST play, or a FG.
We will also have to consider the potential influence to the game from the refs. I still expect to be a lot of missed holding calls, and PI calls can be bewildering, but the best we can hope for is consistency in their calls.


Happy football to you, Timmy!

Here are Marshalls stats while playing in the QB hell hole known as Miami:

2010 MIA 14 (games played) 86 1,014 11.8 46 3 57
2011 MIA 16 (game played) 81 1,214 15.0 65 6 53

Sorry about the terrible formatting, but what these numbers prove is that above anything else, Marshalls production IS consistent! This guy is peaking and now he's stronger and wiser than ever before. Have you watched him play? He will run over you, juke you and do whatever he can to gain yardage. He's impressive.

Yes, I'm getting excited about Jeffrey prematurely, but he's the real deal. How many times in my lifetime can I say that about two Chicago WR's?

I only brought up Campbell to show that Emery has Offense in mind, which is important in todays NFL.

Here are Michael Bushs stats from last year:

256 rushes for 977 yards. 7 TDS
37 receptions for 418.

That's almost 1500 total yards! Talk about a steal for only 7 million guaranteed!!!

He also had two TDs against the Colts.

You mention the 3 step drop and you are correct, we need to have that in order to win. I did not see too much of that against the Colts.

As far as Melton goes, hopefully we'll be talking about him Friday.
Also from slowmo's link above:

quote:
...Defense, part of hangover from last year that people have...
Need to implement other players. Need to grow the number of players who contribute...


No idea what the first sentence translates to. Is he perhaps acknowledging a "funk" that is permeating the team?
The last couple may translate to "Bush sucks in coverage". Big Grin
it was the Colts..............

you know, worst team in the league "Colts", the Suck for Luck "Colts"

apparently they didnt get the memo that strategy was over


glancing at the Chicago TRibune youd think they wrapped up the division

hopefully they prance into Lambeau with heads high from their undefeated record
This could be troublesome in the Bear den:

Bears running back Matt Forte still didn't seem happy after Week 1 -- even after he earned his long-awaited new contract. But it was more about what Forte didn't get: goal-line carries that resulted in Michael Bush scoring two one-yard touchdowns in the Bears' 41-21 victory over the Indianapolis Colts on Sunday at Soldier Field. "It's been happening my whole career here, so I don't know," Forte said when asked about not finishing drives. "That's the coordinator's call." The one drive that stood out was in the first quarter, when Forte had a 32-yard run to jump-start the offense. Five plays later, he ran 15 yards to the 1-yard line. In came Bush, who ran for no gain on first down before plunging across the goal line on second down.

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×