• 6
• 7
• 3
• 6
That's the sorry story of 2nd half scoring through 4 games, includes 1 TD. The mess on offense is still there, masked by an improved defense and that 3-1 record.
Unacceptable that Ted insists with working with only one pick per round in the early rounds. I want two high first, two high second, etc, every year
MichiganPacker posted:PackFoo posted:Henry posted:Can't think of a reason why Schum isn't cut today and replaced with anyone else. There can be no drop off bringing in someone from the street.
Masthay is still unemployed. Seriously...he could be no worse. Ditto Mortadella.
If you are going to change at this point, I think it has to be Masthay. He could come in and hold for FG/PATs and they wouldn't miss a beat. Other than that, don't do anything to mess up the snapper/holder/kicker unit.
With all the bad moves the Packers have made with punters, I seriously hope they are looking to bring Masthay back. Schum is currently ranked 30th in the NFL in punting, and one of the guys he is ahead of is the Arizona placekicker, who had to fill in when their punter was hurt. He's averaging 40 yards, with a net of 38. In an off year in 2015, Masthay averaged 44 and 40, respectively.
excalibur posted:• 6
• 7
• 3
• 6
That's the sorry story of 2nd half scoring through 4 games, includes 1 TD. The mess on offense is still there, masked by an improved defense and that 3-1 record.
Not good! Please TT, it's an election year, let's Make the Packers Great Again. ****, just make Rodgers great again and the rest will follow!
El-Ka-Bong posted:(but I thought what Bulaga did was a penalty?)
Just noticed they had Spriggs in at TE on that play.
- Far too much blue in the stands last night
+ The ones around me were pretty laid back
It's hard to bitch about the results, but I didn't see anything in particular that makes me believe this team has 'turned the corner' or is otherwise playing significantly better.
In a nutshell, the offense seems to pop its' wad by the end of the 1st quarter, then spends the rest of the game trying to hang on. Whether that's game plan, "adjustments" by the coaches, and/or execution by the players that's to blame, I'm convinced that getting away from what was working is NOT the answer.
Another example is WR production. At one time, the Giants had 3 defensive starters out of the game; why were not attacking their replacements every play? They had a friggin' rookie out there, and we don't have anybody that can't beat him? That makes no sense to me at all. With our experience at QB and WR, we should have been schooling them all night long. The way I see it, there is only 2 answers; either or WRs suck or the called plays suck.
Defensively, we are still lost in the backfield. Our guys were as lucky as they were good. Randall being out was addition by subtraction, and they need to stick with the combo of Hyde/Rollins/Brice/Gunter until that young man finds his mojo again.
Special teams have returned to special education. Why the most basic and simple responsibility a football player can have remains a problem for 10+ years is mind-boggling. It's more common to have a penalty on punt plays than it is not to.
Whatever the reason behind it, jettisoning Ginger for this loser Schum remains a POOR decision. Why they let it continue is even worse.
Could there be 3 answers for your question?
#3. It's entirely possible I have no idea what I'm talking about. 
Boris posted:Lost some cash on the over
I was rooting for the Giants to tie it up so I could get the over in OT (O/U = 48)
Never again bet the over with this Packer defense. Or this Packer offense for that matter.
Timmy! posted:At one time, the Giants had 3 defensive starters out of the game; why were not attacking their replacements every play? They had a friggin' rookie out there, and we don't have anybody that can't beat him? That makes no sense to me at all. With our experience at QB and WR, we should have been schooling them all night long.
We do what we do.
ammo posted:Boris posted:Lost some cash on the over
I was rooting for the Giants to tie it up so I could get the over in OT (O/U = 48)
Never again bet the over with this Packer defense. Or this Packer offense for that matter.
Packerboi told me to bet it 
Starks won't be back next year for the $3 million if he doesn't get his head out of his posterior.
YATittle posted:Starks won't be back next year.
FTFY
Boris posted:ammo posted:Boris posted:Lost some cash on the over
I was rooting for the Giants to tie it up so I could get the over in OT (O/U = 48)
Never again bet the over with this Packer defense. Or this Packer offense for that matter.
Packerboi told me to bet it
Yup, ugh!
Gunter played well.
Jenkins played like an All=Pro with the Flu no less.
Manning played like shi* in a venue he usually plays well.
Rodgers/Jordy regressed despite having ALL day to throw.
WTF...
Attachments
Images (1)
I thought he wanted to be called: "Gunt" ??
El-Ka-Bong posted:(but I thought what Bulaga did was a penalty?)
In rugby it's called a "maul"...