Dr._Bob posted:Trump's tweets or all tweets?
Brent Bourgeois (of 80s duo Bourgeois Tagg) calls Donny the Toilet Twittler. So, Trump would be upwards of 95%.
Hungry5 posted:Dr._Bob posted:Trump's tweets or all tweets?
So, Trump would be upwards of 95%.
I don't mind at all.
Boris postedI'm sitting on the pot right now
It's not a suppository.
You have to smoke it or eat it!
Each and every one of you is going to Hell.
Wait, Skip Bayless used to respect Green Bay? Huh.
bvan posted:Boris postedI'm sitting on the pot right now
It's not a suppository.
You have to smoke it or eat it!
Not necessarily. I'm wearing a hemp shirt too.
I prefer edibles in the elite state of California. 
Boris posted:bvan posted:Boris postedI'm sitting on the pot right now
It's not a suppository.
You have to smoke it or eat it!Not necessarily. I'm wearing a hemp shirt too.
I prefer edibles in the elitist state of California.
FIFY
Still not fully trusting this D. I mean looking forward to games vs teams that can run the ball and don't have a QB that poops himself. Those turnovers aren't always going to be there and they just get gashed vs the run. They'll keep flashing vs jumpy QB's but there won't be a lot of those types in the playoffs, if we get there.
The D currently ranks lower than they did at the end of last year. Looked no better vs. the run at DAL than they did vs. PHI. EZ was having his way, not to even mention what Cooper did. Looks like a bit of a popcorn defense where there are a lot of ups and downs but enough ups (sacks and turnovers) to win the game. Wasn't the 2011 D a lot like that? Their problem was in the secondary instead of vs. the run but at the end of the day, the offense kept that D off the field and the D grabbed a lot of turnovers. In games where the offense stalled, they lost. And that offense was way more talented. I guess the difference being this D has pretty much won some games for the offense though they were in Sept.
I think the D is one very good/excellent ILB and another DL hog away from being elite. The secondary isn't there yet but they're young and I think they're on their way. We're set at OLB.
A lot of football left to enjoy but they really need to figure out a way to shore up the run D when they get into Nov./Dec.
Let’s see if he can stay healthy for half the season. That would be a step in the right direction. Talent and ability has never been the problem with King.
TJ Watt has missed one game in his career. 23.5 sacks and 28 TFL in 36 games. Not too shabby.
As for the defense overall, I think they are better and will continue to improve but I worry when they play a QB like Wentz that doesn’t turn the ball over. Just about every team they would play come January will feature a guy like that whether it’s Wilson or Brees or Goff or even Jimmy G.
Pad Stafford is off to a good start so far and I think he will test the D as well. Need to get pressure on him!
DH13 posted:Still not fully trusting this D. I mean looking forward to games vs teams that can run the ball and don't have a QB that poops himself. Those turnovers aren't always going to be there and they just get gashed vs the run. They'll keep flashing vs jumpy QB's but there won't be a lot of those types in the playoffs, if we get there.
The D currently ranks lower than they did at the end of last year. Looked no better vs. the run at DAL than they did vs. PHI. EZ was having his way, not to even mention what Cooper did. Looks like a bit of a popcorn defense where there are a lot of ups and downs but enough ups (sacks and turnovers) to win the game. Wasn't the 2011 D a lot like that? Their problem was in the secondary instead of vs. the run but at the end of the day, the offense kept that D off the field and the D grabbed a lot of turnovers. In games where the offense stalled, they lost. And that offense was way more talented. I guess the difference being this D has pretty much won some games for the offense though they were in Sept.
I think the D is one very good/excellent ILB and another DL hog away from being elite. The secondary isn't there yet but they're young and I think they're on their way. We're set at OLB.
A lot of football left to enjoy but they really need to figure out a way to shore up the run D when they get into Nov./Dec.
I can see how some don't trust this D yet. BUT I think the difference now is that they get pressure on the QB and they generate turnovers which hasn't happened for a few years now. Why I trust this defenese is that now it is well coached, they are agressive as hell, physical, get after the opponent, and we could trust them to win a game for the Packers if need be.
Do they give up too many yards right now? yep they do but I would bet good money if they stay healthy they will get that fixed.
All those things have worked vs. jumpy QB's with less than top OL's. Not so much vs good ones like Wentz/OL. We'll see how they fare vs SF/Garappalo and KC/Mahomes. Those are the kind of QB's they'll face in the post season. If they get there.
Did you have SB aspirations before the season started? Enjoy and appreciate the significant progress that has been made and understand we still have a large window with #12.
Nobody's arguing with that. Sounds crazy but it is possible to both appreciate and critique.
Really didn't need any sacks or turnovers to beat Philly- just better red zone production from the offense. As badly as the defense got worked over in that game the team was in a position to win it and probably should have.
BrainDed posted:Did you have SB aspirations before the season started? Enjoy and appreciate the significant progress that has been made and understand we still have a large window with #12.
I for one had a lot of optimism but I didn't have any real expectations of a Super Bowl this year. But, I am very excited about what I have seen from this team so far and the direction they are going. I think with Gute running the show with another offseason this team could be on its way to something special.
So far, so good with this D. I look forward to the young'uns maturing and getting better and better. Remember that last year at this time we were singing the praises of JJackson and this year he hardly sees the field. Did his play decline or is it that the talant is so much better now? I think it's the latter. Jackson started 10 games last year; this year, zero. Brice started 10 games last year. If they continue to mature, stay healthy, and progress, the sky's the limit with this D.
Where the defense is in the first month of the season is not where it has to be in the latter stages of the season. They have a lot of new personnel and can improve. Of course, they can also slide. But o far, so good. They make plays and can create pressure.
#Packers DC Mike Pettine said he was critical of his own play-calling performance when they went up 31-3 against Cowboys. Pettine said he thinks he should’ve called more pressures. Said you can never relax in the NFL. Packers ended up winning by only 10.
— Matt Schneidman (@mattschneidman) October 11, 2019
Admitting to not being perfect. Who are these coaches?
We'll get that fixed.
Just awful!
PackerHawk posted:Admitting to not being perfect. Who are these coaches?
We do what we do.
Here are the teams that have forced the highest 3 & OUT % so far this season. #GoNiners #GoBills #GoPats #Titans #FlyEaglesFly #Browns #KeepPounding #GoPackGo #Bears100 #BroncosCountry #LARams #HereWeGo #Seahawks @gregcosell | @MattBowen41 pic.twitter.com/BCO26kei48
— NFL Matchup on ESPN (@NFLMatchup) October 14, 2019
I don't see the Vaunted Vikings in that list. Tsk Tsk
From what I hear the Packers are 2 plays away from being 2-3.
But...but...but.....that Vikings defense is so staaaaaaacked.
Vikings always seem to be disrespected by stats.
Dr._Bob posted:Vikings always seem to be disrespected by stats.
And season's end W-L record.
Boris posted:From what I hear the Packers are 2 plays away from being 2-3.
Are the Packers now 3 plays away from being 2-4??
1 play away from being 6-0.
And 2 plays away from two more SB appearances and/wins (Rice, dumbass TE).
Really remarkable how well they played after the horrible start.
Somebody pulled their acts together. Could have been the Smiths on D getting them going and MLF on offense. It would be fun to know...
