@Blair Kiel posted:Read his post. Wife’s event happens at kick off.
He needs a different wife. 😀
I searched eBay for "smoke show."
All I got was vape pens and vintage ashtrays.
Fast start on O for GB and solid run D in the first half, equates to a 1 dimensional Rams O in the 2nd half. That should result in a TO or 2, and some short field scoring drives for AR and friends.
Rams DC Staley is a Vic Fangio acolyte. Rodgers vs. Fangio defenses he's 6-6, BUT he's 272/46 (64%), 3013 yards, 23 TD, 5 INT, and an average rating of 100 and has averaged 25 ppg. That includes matchups vs. SF early last decade vs. CHI, and one game against DEN. Rodgers doesn't seem to have much problem with the scheme, but having Donald in his face and Ramsey jumping routes is kind of wrinkle he hasn't seen yet. Reading that article about Staley a few weeks ago, everything is going to be focused on slowing down our passing game. They're going to look to confuse Rodgers, jump routes/take chances, and not let him throw bombs downfield. It's going to be a game where we certainly need commitment to the running game with our full backfield from MLF and Rodgers and honestly running directly at Donald and try to take advantage of his injury. Probably the best defense we've seen this year although Indy was pretty good and Rodgers worked them over well enough.
We need to get some carries to Dillon.
NOW IS THE TIME.
With those temps we should see Dillon, part 2. Maybe in the second half for some icing.
Comparing the current Rams-Packers matchup with the Pack's Kryptonite in previous playoff defeats since 2011:
A physical, aggressive opponent defense capable of holding GB's offense (at least somewhat) in check = ✓✓✓
This is the best scoring D in the NFL with not only the best defensive player but a number of other solid linemen who can get after Rodgers (especially without Bak), a top CB in Ramsey to guard Davante, and a solid secondary overall.
Above-average, committed opponent running attack = ✓
The Rams running improved markedly with Akers taking over as the #1 back late in the season (and LT Whitworth is back for the playoffs), but it does not rival what SF did last season and there will be no Kap-like rushing for a record number of yards by a QB with Dom gone ... right? (Even if Wolford is starting at QB ... right Mike Pettine?)
Poor Packer Special Teams (outside of Crosby) = ✓✓✓
A passive and mediocre (or worse) Packer defense = ???????????
The Packer D-Ram O matchup will get far less attention than the matchup of GB's #1 O versus LA's #1 D, but I believe this is where the game will be decided and I believe there is reason for optimism that the D will rise to the occasion.
There is no reason for GB to play passively, at home, against this Rams' offense. LAs WRs are competent but not very explosive. Jaire and King matchup well with (an injured) Kupp and Woods.
Goff was not playing well before he broke his right thumb. Wolford has played 1 NFL game. And based upon personal experience and discussions with a former Packer QB, do not underestimate what it is like to suddenly switch from sunny So Cal to the frigid tundra (especially for a Cali native like Goff who relies upon a clean pocket and perfect conditions to get his game to average).
As for LA's running game, as discussed above it is solid and ascending, but not spectacular.
If this were mid-season and Lowry, Lancaster, and Adams were the trio eating up all the snaps next to Clark as Pettine continued to emphasize a light box featuring just 2 DL and mostly just Kirksey at ILB, I'd give the Rams a better than even shot of running their way to victory.
However, I am very hopeful that with the addition of snacks at DT, Pettine's increased use of more than 2 DL, and Barnes (and Martin) getting more time at ILB that the defense can contribute, and dare I say lead, the Pack to victory on Saturday.
Go Pack Go!
I appreciate the honest analysis. Yes, the Rams D is special but there's a reason they lost to the Jets. Right now, the lack of playmakers on O is pretty stark.
If you're a subscriber to PackerNews there is a GREAT story on the long trip of Daffney to the NFL, he had an uncle who played six years as an OL in the NFL, a dad who played basketball at UCLA, and he played mostly special teams in college until senior year. He's a humble, hard working, all business guy. Would love for him to get some moments in the playoffs....
I'm not sure if we'll see much from Dillon this game. His big day against TN was awesome, but he was only in there because of injuries and the fact that TN has no pass rush. I suspect that Dillon has seen limited playing time because they do not trust him in pass protection. He barely played against Shitcago in my mind because they have a good pass rush. I hope I'm wrong and would love to see him have a game like he did previously, but I'm not very optimistic.
At least put him in at the goalline considering he trucked the DL guy that outweighed him by 50 pounds....
@DH13 posted:With those temps we should see Dillon, part 2. Maybe in the second half for some icing.
Did you say icing?
Not sure I see the same comparisons v the 2011 Packers. They had 4 turnovers in that game v the Giants. 9 dropped passes. Not to mention the Joe Philbin related situation.
That 2011 defense was awful. As in allowing 423 yards per game. Almost 5 yards per attempt on the ground. The OL was shaky as well. Allowing 41 sacks that season. Almost twice as many as this season.
Can't lose the turnover battle, we can tie in that category and still win because I think we have the better team, but can't lose it. Regarding Donald, their other d-lineman; LaFleur said something in his Bear presser about Hicks that really impressed me. He said that the first time they played the Bears & it was not clear whether Hicks would play or not (he didn't), LaFleur had two call sheets indicating that if Hicks played there were specific plays that we just would not run, that could be run without him in there....I LOVE this! Many times in the MM era he had Don Barclay pass block one-on-one vs. someone like Mack when it was an obvious mismatch, and refuse to give him any help. Same thing in run game when they would try to "reach block" a guy like Donald when it was just an athletically impossible task. LaFeur seems to really help guys who he knows are not going to hold up vs. an all pro type player through play calls, etc. Dominant d-lineman have been pretty quiet vs. us this year.
"We do what we do" is rarely a philosophy that that creates longevity.
@FLPACKER posted:Can't lose the turnover battle, we can tie in that category and still win because I think we have the better team, but can't lose it. Regarding Donald, their other d-lineman; LaFleur said something in his Bear presser about Hicks that really impressed me. He said that the first time they played the Bears & it was not clear whether Hicks would play or not (he didn't), LaFleur had two call sheets indicating that if Hicks played there were specific plays that we just would not run, that could be run without him in there....I LOVE this! Many times in the MM era he had Don Barclay pass block one-on-one vs. someone like Mack when it was an obvious mismatch, and refuse to give him any help. Same thing in run game when they would try to "reach block" a guy like Donald when it was just an athletically impossible task. LaFeur seems to really help guys who he knows are not going to hold up vs. an all pro type player through play calls, etc. Dominant d-lineman have been pretty quiet vs. us this year.
EXACTLY!
Brace yourselves all you Northerners! It may be after the Rams game, but the weather might be even colder the next week, should the packers beat the rams.
Which they should
Rams defense is legit. Key will be the Packer O-Line. Can they give Rodgers time ? Will they be able to run the ball ? They have done the job all season. This will be a good test.
On offense, the Rams have some nice skill players in Kupp, Woods, Higbee, etc....they need a QB to make it work. Big opportunity to focus the defense and play aggressively….Hopefully Pettine's game plan isn't too passive.
What would be so great would be if the Bills and Packers get to host the championship games. Two small, cold weather cities....
@DocBenni posted:I'm not sure if we'll see much from Dillon this game. His big day against TN was awesome, but he was only in there because of injuries and the fact that TN has no pass rush. I suspect that Dillon has seen limited playing time because they do not trust him in pass protection. He barely played against Shitcago in my mind because they have a good pass rush. I hope I'm wrong and would love to see him have a game like he did previously, but I'm not very optimistic.
I read accounts post game that said Dillon didn't see much action because they only ran 44 plays on offense and didn't get to that part of the game plan. We've seen MLF run an offense with either 33 or 30 out of the game and he didn't go to the 3rd RB, he instead spent his time elsewhere on the offense. I think Dillon was highlighted vs TEN partly because 30 was out but also because of the weather conditions and MLF saw something he could exploit in the TEN D. Should be interesting to see what his gameplan is vs. this LAR D.
watched the ram game again, I am more concerned with the other cb johnson, he was making plays all over the place, if he gets on mvs or lazard, he could be in a similar position...that's the matchup I watch, and akers was pretty good also.
@The Heckler posted:UGH I knew the Packers were going to draw the Saturday night game. I am stuck at a small event for my wife's work and I won't be near a TV. Of course it starts at 430 EST right at kickoff.
Dude, COVID. Tell your wife you are afraid to get COVID and stay home.
@michiganjoe posted:Anyone beginning to feel a little too good about the game should just recall a 15-1 Packer team that was expected to dispatch the Giants without much difficultly. Think the Packers will prevail, but the Ram defense will be a huge challenge.
No such thing as a gimme in the NFL.
@Boris posted:I asked my 5 yr old if he wants to wears his new @packers sweatshirt today because they have a big game at the end of this week. He said - “Do they play today??” I told him, “No, Bud. Not for 5 days.” His response - “I wish the Packers played every day.” 😄😍 #same #GoPackGo
— Midwest Amber (@MidwestAmber) January 11, 2021
I think Packers games everyday is set aside for heaven. Also in heaven, the name Bostic is banned and Elway is a 300 lb slob.
@DH13 posted:I read accounts post game that said Dillon didn't see much action because they only ran 44 plays on offense and didn't get to that part of the game plan. We've seen MLF run an offense with either 33 or 30 out of the game and he didn't go to the 3rd RB, he instead spent his time elsewhere on the offense. I think Dillon was highlighted vs TEN partly because 30 was out but also because of the weather conditions and MLF saw something he could exploit in the TEN D. Should be interesting to see what his gameplan is vs. this LAR D.
5 snaps out of 44 plays. I think at least 3 of those were the dual Dillon/Jones formations. Hope to see more of that. Williams only had 12 snaps, too. This was a very Jones heavy week. 2nd in 3 weeks. I think they felt comfortable riding Jones more with the limited number of possessions and knowing they had the following week off with a win.
Week 16 had 66 snaps to go around and I think even if Jones hadn't been nicked up early Dillon was going to see a lot of playing time (20+ snaps) with Jones coming off a 56 snap game vs the Panthers.
Hope they put Jaire on Woods, I think King can handle Cupp. Not sure about the TE though.
@PackerHawk posted:Did you say icing?
No, he said fuck you Pakrz.
Priorities!
You can start taking grad classes again after Jordan Love takes over and we stop going to the playoffs. 
Fuck, that's another 4 or 5 years.
Maybe I'll just stick with living off your tax dollars.
@AdamSchefter
·
OT Jared Veldheer, who started for the Colts' on Saturday, is now signing with the Packers, per source. Veldheer will be the first player in NFL history to play two postseason games for two playoff teams. He is allowed to sign with GB because he was on the Colts' practice squad.
ThAT IS AWESOME. hE WAS GREAT LAST YEAR IN THE SEAHAWKS PLAYOFF GAME.
@Pikes Peak posted:Has this ever happened before?
No. Only possible this year due to COVID rules.
Potentially a very important signing. Way to go, Gute!