Skip to main content

quote:
Originally posted by Pablo:
any idea around what time the packers will be drafting @ 26?


Pablo ? is that you ? I thought you weren't going to post anymore...

quote:
Originally posted by Pablo:
No entiendo sus estupideces. La verdad estoy harto de sus chistes y que creen que tienen toda la verdad. Se sienten muy cagados. es la ultima vez que publico algo. Vaya come mierdas.




X4 never forgets

I think you everybody an apology Frowner
quote:
No entiendo sus estupideces. La verdad estoy harto de sus chistes y que creen que tienen toda la verdad. Se sienten muy cagados. es la ultima vez que publico algo. Vaya come mierdas


Translated...

I do not understand his nonsense. The truth I'm sick of your jokes and think they have the whole truth. They feel very s**t. is the last time I post something. Go eat s**t.

The translation is like Hawks game. Lacking flow but you understand what's trying to be done and talk yourself into appreciation of the the effort.
Book a hotel room in Jersey for Feb 1st 2014, pitch a massive dome tent, bottle of scotch. Those would all be in play if Star fell to 26. It's nice to know Minny has two picks right in front of GB so it's really like him falling to 22nd.

But like Red told Andy, "I don't think you oughta' be doing this to yourself. That's just a s****y pipe dream. Star is way the hell down there and you're stuck up here at 26".
If the draft falls together the way the rumors are saying it will, Star falling to the Packers isn't unrealistic. Right now it's sounding like he may be the 4th DT that is picked and looking at some of the team needs between 1 and 25 there may not be a huge market for him. Sharrif Floyd may also take a tumble if the Raiders don't take him.
quote:
Originally posted by Grave Digger:
If the draft falls together the way the rumors are saying it will, Star falling to the Packers isn't unrealistic. Right now it's sounding like he may be the 4th DT that is picked and looking at some of the team needs between 1 and 25 there may not be a huge market for him. Sharrif Floyd may also take a tumble if the Raiders don't take him.


So, you see public masturbation in my future. How embarrassing.
This draft has so much equal talent from the 15th best guy to the 96th pick. The best talent evaluators should absolutely clean up in this draft in rounds 2-4 and get some talented starters for years. If TT moves down and loads up on picks in 2,3,4, and 5 it could really help decide power in the North for quite a while.
quote:
Originally posted by Pakrz:
He mentioned in a recent article that Pickett and Raji showed up for off season workouts fat and out of shape.


...not good considering that both looked like they were on roller skates when we last saw them vs. SF. SF's OC went into the game thinking he wouldn't be able to run between the tackles,what a pleasant surprise for him that Raji & Pickett offered little resistance.
quote:
Originally posted by El-Ka-Bong:
quote:
Originally posted by vitaflo:
Mayock has us taking Lacy.


I have a hard time seeing him as the 26th best player, not that I would mind him on my team, just seems like he should be taken later.


This...especially when there are so many needs at DL, ILB and OL. As much as we'd like to have a workhorse RB, defense was the reason we lost games last year. The offense is fine...especially if we get a starting OL out of this draft.

Sly Williams, Datone Jones, Justin Pugh, Menelik Watson...I am OK with any of these dudes. I'm also OK with TT trading into the 2nd and adding a 3rd and 4th, etc. This team needs depth more than it needs a bellcow RB. RB by committee has worked just fine. Especially when you lineup Cobb as a change of pace RB.
McCarthy said he wants an every down back and it's been reported that the Packers want to get more physical, so by that criteria Eddie Lacy makes a lot of sense. He's a strong runner for early downs and a solid pass protector for 3rd down. I've read the Bengals really covet him though so he might not make it to 26.

I think they're going to look for beef on DLine. They've shown a ton of interest in Georgia DL Kwame Geathers. I expect him to either be their 3rd or 4th round pick. So if they go DL in round 1, it will be a BIG guy. I'm wondering if they want to fight fire with fire when they play San Fran...they have massive OL, so they're going to bring in some massive DL to match.
And that's kind of why I am unsure of the Sly Williams pick. Despite his listed weight of 310+, he doesn't play like a big guy. He's not a guy who can anchor and hold against a double team. He's very quick and has a good array of pass rush moves, but his bull rush is almost non-existent.

That's where a guy like Jonathan Hankins is different. He's a huge guy, and he plays like it. His pass rush technique needs a lot of work, but when he gets that big body moving he's hard to stop. So if it comes down to Williams vs. Hankins, my money would be on Hankins.
quote:
Originally posted by Satori:
quote:
Originally posted by Pablo:
any idea around what time the packers will be drafting @ 26?


Pablo ? is that you ? I thought you weren't going to post anymore...

quote:
Originally posted by Pablo:
No entiendo sus estupideces. La verdad estoy harto de sus chistes y que creen que tienen toda la verdad. Se sienten muy cagados. es la ultima vez que publico algo. Vaya come mierdas.




X4 never forgets

I think you everybody an apology Frowner


You are right! I forgot. Sorry about that. Never again!!! jajajajajaja

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×