Over/Under set at 61
This is going to be a barn burner.
Might as well burn the last game at this stadium down!
Listening to the announcers just reminds me how much I loathe that network.
We're comin' Matty... be afraid!!
Replies sorted oldest to newest
Hope Burnett is back....his absence made the game vs Cokeboys closer than it would have been.
Did they ever say what the injury was? Strange as watching game just looked like it should have been a wind knocked out of you kind of moment. Agreed it really affected what could do with the secondary.
Said it was a quad,
i was afraid it was a concussion
Burnett passed, next man up
Take the over.
41-38 Packers.
Packers go to SB allowing 30 Plus points per game in playoffs.
I hope they get something patched together and Hawkins a **** ton of snaps this week. Randall is a god damn liability.
Randall is a voyeur right now.
BrainDed posted:41-38 Packers.
Packers go to SB allowing 30 Plus points per game in playoffs.
I got 27 per using your prognostication.
You get the point.
Not really.
Should have considered who was talking, my bad.
Point is, little Chilli, that the defense gives up more points than most who reach the Super Bowl. Isn't it best your bed time little buddy. Go night night now little pumpkin, hmmkay?
Replay of game is on right now on NFL Network. If you want another heart attack! Hyde just sacked Dak. Jeez, GB looked like it was going to get steamrolled on that first series... again.
Games like these you can never get enough of the replays and highlights.
Is Nelson gonna play against Falcons?
Burnett?
BrainDed posted:Should have considered who was talking, my bad.
Point is, little Chilli, that the defense gives up more points than most who reach the Super Bowl. Isn't it best your bed time little buddy. Go night night now little pumpkin, hmmkay?
"The defense gives up more points than most who reach the super bowl"
Thanks for the facts dumbass. That's detail.
Falcons....a team that I've never had any particular grudges against, but I root for them to lose because of their fans. Possibly the worst bandwagoners in the league, most have little knowledge of the game, and they generally care more about their prejudices than their team. Those are the only reasons they're not as obnoxious as Cheatriot or Steelers fans.
I don't see them being that much different than the Cokeboys; all offense and no defense. The upcoming game shouldn't play out that much different than it did vs DallAss. But I pray that it does. I'd love nothing more than another 48-10 blowout!
I bet the under. not much but UNDER
So the final score is going to be 77-76 then.
Henry posted:I hope they get something patched together and Hawkins a **** ton of snaps this week. Randall is a god damn liability.
Randall is hard to watch. On many snaps he does not even look ready, standing straight up, not in an athletic snap. Body language is that he does not want to compete in pass / or run.
It has to be an injury with Randall, doesn't it. How come some weeks (Seattle) he looks like he is ready to take that step and then others (yesterday) he looks really really lost.
I suppose it could be multiple personality disorder.
Issue with Randall could well be his health, as least I hope that's all it is. Safe to say both second year corners haven't performed to expectations.
and ok, I knew it was coming.....Mike, urban boy of Mike and Mike, "as much as this game was so exciting....... I really feel bad Dax lost this game". Oh barf, barf, and more barf. He makes me sick.....and that's going to be the talking heads mantra ALL week. Ah...that Dax sure stepped up....and blah, blah, blah.
Um, he did.
Goldie posted:and ok, I knew it was coming.....Mike, urban boy of Mike and Mike, "as much as this game was so exciting....... I really feel bad Dax lost this game". Oh barf, barf, and more barf. He makes me sick.....and that's going to be the talking heads mantra ALL week. Ah...that Dax sure stepped up....and blah, blah, blah.
That's your fault for listening to those puds.
It's ok Goldie, Dex is pretty good, our guy is great, Dex is good. It's ok. RELAX.
CHEEZE posted:Um, he did.
I KNOW.....but the falling all over themselves over him is kind of sickening. Oh, and it's JMHO. 
Rodgers and Cook and Crosby stepped up even more.
Falcons are beatable, not much different than the 2010 team: strong running game, strong group of receivers, same QB, suspect defense that plays hard. The big difference is Vic Beasley, probably the best pass rusher all year. He will be the X factor in this game. If they can keep him quiet then it will be a shootout. Same goes for the Packers D, if they can pressure Matt Ryan then he will fold. Should be fun watching Clay vs. cousin Jake though, something tells he will work extra hard to school his young relative. If Peppers wants that ring he may well be the X factor for GB, these moments are the reason he got so few snaps early in the season.
I just wish one of the pundits would admit that Dak's great game and comeback came against a beat up and injured defense that wasn't very good to start with....
Like I said earlier...I wonder how many points the Packer offense could have put up on the Packer's defense? Hmmmmmm
When you watch Randall play it just seems to me he's not prepared or not motivated or both. He has talent to be successful but appears to go through the motions way too often.
Opposing receivers and QBs see this and they know there's blood in the water.
I think the Falcons are better now than the 2010 or 2012 versions. This game might be just like the earlier matchup this year where it takes a last minute drive to win the game.
The factor that I think makes the Falcons better this time around is Quinn > Smith.
Dak was throwing to a fully healthy WR group against a secondary that was 1/2 UDFA's and UDFA rookies.
AR was throwing to a WR group minus their #1, against a fully healthy veteran secondary, minus Claibourn in the 4th.
One thing I guarantee, Quinn has more respect for the Pack than Smith did in 2010. Smith underestimated them and it was costly. Quinn is no dummy, he is going to be waking up every night in a cold sweat from nightmares of #12 dropping dimes all over the field.
FLPACKER posted:Henry posted:I hope they get something patched together and Hawkins a **** ton of snaps this week. Randall is a god damn liability.
Randall is hard to watch. On many snaps he does not even look ready, standing straight up, not in an athletic snap. Body language is that he does not want to compete in pass / or run.
Yup. What happened?
OK, for all the late comers that didn't see the injury reports several days before and leading up to the game: Randall had a foot injury.
He was clearly not at full speed as you could see him struggling to stay with anyone on routes.
Anybody have any questions about Adams' from last year?
The #Packers inactive list when they lost 33-32 to the #Falcons week 8? Cobb, Randall, Rollins, Starks, Matthews, Montgomery & Cook
â Lance Allan (@lanceallan) January 16, 2017
