@PackLandVA posted:Trade players not picks??
Why not both? LV could probably use some WR help. GB has a stable of guys, some are going to want to get paid. Get rid of one of the oft injured guys or a mental midget.
@JimBobDuggar posted:Why not both? LV could probably use some WR help. GB has a stable of guys, some are going to want to get paid. Get rid of one of the oft injured guys or a mental midget.
I mentioned this in the Doubs thread. Everyone knew Adams was gone and they would need a receiver.
Now with Brady on board it will be interesting see what the Raiders do with Crosby. I wonder if the Adams trade would have been done too. Hell, Adams may have had the opportunity of Brady throwing him the ball. I'd bet he would be better than Godgers is today.
@JimBobDuggar posted:Why not both? LV could probably use some WR help. GB has a stable of guys, some are going to want to get paid. Get rid of one of the oft injured guys or a mental midget.
I'd say the same thing applies if LV considers trading Crosby. If he leaves, they need another body to replace him.
So... maybe trade Van Ness and a day 3 pick for Crosby. I think that would also free up the salary cap dollars needed to assume Crosby's contract.
Looks like a win-win to me.