Skip to main content

The reason Janis will never be the next Jordy Nelson is that Jordy, much like all great players, relies as much on the mental side as the physical side. He has the work ethic, the confidence, the intelligence, the drive, etc. So far  it doesn't seem the coaches or Rodgers have trusted Janis with routes other than a bubble screen, go route, or maybe an occasional slant. That tells me he either hasn't shown the intelligence to grasp the offense or the hasn't shown the work ethic to understand the offense and be trusted to be where he's supposed to be. If we were talking about a 2nd year player, like we were about Adams in year 2, then I would say wait and see till year 3 or year 4 to judge. After year 3 I would say it's not promising that it will click with him. Being an ST demon is fine, but I think it's funny that's a complement people pay to Janis when they complained for years about why Jarrett Bush was even on the team because he could only play ST. 

Last edited by Grave Digger
Henry posted:
YooperPackfan posted:

So why do so many threads on here turn into Janis threads anyway?

A fever.  A fever for more "Great Whitey Hopeitis". 

Nah, I had some of the same hope for Davis. But Janis is bigger and fits the profile 0f that type of player that I was trying to make. Its about a possible breakout player who is already on the team. My point was that with the change in the offense scheme it would favor a taller faster player to threaten to take the top off of the defense. I could not care less over his race.

Most here disagree with my "Prediction".

I am in the minority. (I hope the word minority does not offend anybody)

Last edited by PackerPatrick

"Cracker"? LOL, you never met my full blooded Cherokee father. It was against the law for my parents to get married in SC at the time. The law was still on the books for quite some time. I remember all the crap I had to put up with in school.

Now on the other hand, my mother was kind of Whitebread. And a Midwestern gal to boot.

But Yes, the joke was lame. I need to work on that. I have to admit you guys here really are witty. I enjoy it.

Last edited by PackerPatrick
Henry posted:

I was talking about my bad jokes Jim Thorpe.  You're fine.

Its "CRACKER PREACHER OPPRESSION!" that struck a nerve.

But, that's ok, now I feel better. Your jokes are fine, I just missed a few of them. I may not be a "Cracker" but I am a retired Army Chaplain (Preacher) and proud member of the Eagle Warrior Society. My grandmother first taught me the words to "Jesus loves me" in Cherokee. Which began my spiritual journey.

And just don't get me started about Thorpe! He was a much better football player than Janis is  

Last edited by PackerPatrick

If everyone likes an underdog, Janis is the best fit for an underdog on the roster.  All I know is that this whole WR thing will play itself out.  The GM & the coaches will make their decisions in spite of our desires - for or against, and if it all works out - fine.  If it doesn't we will all complain until FA/draft relief shows up.  It is the NFL cycle of life.  

Ty is the only RB with experience - makes sense he has first dibs on the job.  To pass him one of the others will have plenty to learn and then demonstrate on the field.  It could happen - but I don't know if it will.  

PackerPatrick posted:
ChilliJon posted:

I wonder who wrote it for Peter King. 

He thanks Bill Walsh ,Boomer Esiason, Jimmy Johnson, Bruce Smith, Rod Woodson, Barry Sanders, Johnny Holland, Steve Tasker, Sean Landeta, Mel Gray, Sid Gillman, Ricky Watters, Steve Sabol and many others. In his forward.

Peter King has made a nice life for himself stringing together thoughts of others. He's very careful not to upset anyone. 

Frank Deford passed away yesterday. Read his work. That's a guy that that covered stories with no regard of backlash. He's a sports writer. 

PackerPatrick posted:

"Cracker"? LOL, you never met my full blooded Cherokee father. It was against the law for my parents to get married in SC at the time. The law was still on the books for quite some time. I remember all the crap I had to put up with in school.

Now on the other hand, my mother was kind of Whitebread. And a Midwestern gal to boot.

But Yes, the joke was lame. I need to work on that. I have to admit you guys here really are witty. I enjoy it.

Please don't tell us you once tutored Kaepernik.

Fedya posted:
Goalline posted:
Henry posted:
Blair Kiel posted:

I think we can all agree that we'd still hate Goalline even if he was white.

See, we're not racist. 

He is an anomaly in race relations.  Everyone Hates Goalline, a underrated sit-com.

Starring Fedya in blackface. The least funny comedy in history.

Never seen so many black folks with flat buts like ever.

packaddict posted:

Just remember that the defense has no clue which player in that formation will get that ONE football. 

Yes, I agree.  But I was thinking of the offensive side of the ball.  With all the predictions for lots of catches or yards per one player or another, the more weapons in the arsenal, the more potential for fewer opportunities per player.  And I personally hope that there are more weapons than the 5 listed.  That is all I meant.  

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×