Skip to main content

ChilliJon posted:

Daniels played 78% of the defensive snaps yesterday. That's a little on the high side. Clark played 76%. 

Less overall plays will result in a higher percentage played, I'm sure these guys are on a "play count", especially on multiple series drives. We "3 & outed" them so much in fist half there was not much of a chance of our guys getting fatigued. 

Before pre-season, I thought the Pack would miss Lacy.  From what I saw in pre-season and into week 1, I am not sure they will miss the current version of Lacy.  The 2013-14 version of Lacy was a beast.  He was a borderline top 10 NFL RB back during those 2 seasons, but doesn't look like he has the same edge he did back in those years. 

I don't think any of the 3 backups to Montgomery will ever be as good as the Lacy of 2013-14, but they quite possibly are better than the Lacy I see out there now.

From the article: 

A few more tidbits from the defensive snap counts: Blake Martinez (42) dominated snaps at linebacker over Jake Ryan (five), Kyler Fackrell played 12 snaps after Ahmad Brooks (six) left with a concussion and Clay Matthews and Nick Perry were both on the field for at least 86 percent of the snaps.

Still, the big takeaway from Sunday was the Packers’ falling in love with the β€œNitro” package, which looks like it’ll be a fundamental part of how Green Bay plays defense in 2017.

 

I distinctly remember two Ryan tackles. Damn productive in five snaps.

I don't think Walter Payton would have done much better than Lacy on the runs he got. It looked like the Packers were keying on him and meeting him in the backfield.  The other thing with Lacy is he has to get a decent amount of touches to get going.  I don't think he will be as effective in Seattle given their depth at running back.  I was impressed by a couple of Montgomery's runs in the second half and William's couple of touches looked pretty good.  The key to Atlanta on offense is the right side of the line.  They like to run right and having Belaga out and Evans being manhandled made them adjust the running game.  I hope Belaga is healthy. 

It will be interested to see if the defense can handle Atlanta.  They did look anemic against the Bears, but this is not the Bears defense we have come to love the few years.  If their offense gets in rhythm and Ryan gets the ball out quick it we be a real test for the Packers.  Personally, I have never viewed Wilson as much more than a very good game manager whose big plays are made by his legs. Ryan has developed into one of those Rodgers, Brees, Manning types that carves up secondaries.

The 2 biggest keys on defense will be avoiding LBs getting isolated as pass defenders, and the pass rush.
The soft spot of our defense is the middle of the field, between 5-15 yards. I hope our new defense minimizes these opportunities. Since they will likely run plays designed to get the ball out of Ryan's hand ASAP, this is where they would be looking for matchups to exploit.
Ryan is quick to panic under pressure, and if we can pressure him like we did Wilson, he'll have that deer-in-the-headlights look, no matter the stage. We need our DBs to have tight coverage that will make Ryan hold on to the ball that much longer. Forcing some quick throws may create chances for a couple of INTs.
It's still likely they will connect on 2-3 big plays, so it'll be important to limit their scoring chances after they do. There were a couple of series yesterday where I thought I was starting to see shades of 2016 coming; the defense would make good stops on 1st and 2nd down, then allow them to convert on 3rd, the defense would just break down completely, let them drive 70 yards or more and score. 
But yesterday, particularly right before the half, they stiffened and shut them down, allowing only FG opportunities after giving up big plays.
THAT was impressive!

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×