Skip to main content

That ATL offense was humming when we were confronted with it in January. 

Doubling up on JJ is a fine idea if you have the horses to pull it off.  We were in the deficit column at the first snap at CB so there really was no one available to help.  It's also a fine idea if their offense doesn't have much after their #1 WR - as in other WR's and then at RB.  ATL has at least 2 other legitimate WR's plus they have 2 legit RB's.  You can say "just don't let JJ beat you" all you want, it doesn't make it a good idea vs a multi-weapon offense. 

Did the D get torched?  Yes.  And DC is the DC so that falls at his feet to some extent.  But to pretend it's as easy as bumping JJ at the line or doubling up on him is just blather.  It certainly will be interesting WK2 this season.

Defense is either going to hold their water in 2017 or they're going to **** the bed again in the playoffs and Dom will be fired. That's about the most optimistic view I have for the 17 D. It ain't horrible. It's a win-win scenario. 

Unless the D ****s the bed, nothing happens, and we're all 9 pages deep in July 2018 having the same player, injury, coach circle jerk for the seventh consecutive year. That would get messy. 

19-7. 3:52 remaining. 

Seattle goes 69 yards in 7 plays. TD in 1:43. 

Seattle recovers onside kick. 

19-14. 2:07 remaining. 

Seattles goes 50 yards in 4 plays. TD in :44.

2 point conversion on fully broke ass play. 

Slocum had an epic meltdown. He should have been fired. But considering 2011 and 2012 this was the moment Capers should have been fired as well. OT in Arizona and Atlanta last year are two more kicks to the man bag. 

 

Blair Kiel posted:

I'll hang-up and listen.

What does FD mean in a text?
FDField Delimiter Computing ยป DatabasesRate it:
FDFinal Destination Governmental ยป TransportationRate it:
FDFlying Dutchman Governmental ยป TransportationRate it:
FDFront Derailleur Regional ยป RailroadsRate it:
FDFirst Date Internet ยป ChatRate it:
20 more rows

Was "Flying Dishes" anywhere on the list?  I know that got changed to FS - "Flying Saucers".  Which was morphed into UFO - "Unidentified Flying Objects".  And  everyone thinks it is about aliens. 

Floridarob posted:

The political Pot shots in pretty much every thread gets annoying.  And of course they only come from one side. 

It DOES get annoying. But some cannot help themselves by feeling superior in their views. It also assumes that many others agree with them. I believe they don't get the flack back they deserve.

Yet, we are all Packers fans and that's cool if we can stay on topic.

Speaking of which, after consideration I am reluctant to buy into Randall even as a slot corner. He spends too much time peeking into the backfield and gets jucked by WR's too often.

Perhaps, or perhaps not. I still see him as a #2 free safety. He has some skill as a ballhawk when the ball is in the air but has trouble sticking to his man in press coverage. Groin or no groin pull. Before the draft (ranking him as a safety) some slammed him on taking bad angles and slow catchup speed. If he is taking Hyde's spot in the slot as a corner/safety I expect the same struggles and hopefully some successes.

In any case we shall see.

Last edited by PackerPatrick
PackerPatrick posted:
Floridarob posted:

The political Pot shots in pretty much every thread gets annoying.  And of course they only come from one side. 

It DOES get annoying. But some cannot help themselves by feeling superior in their views. It also assumes that many others agree with them. I believe they don't get the flack back they deserve.

Yet, we are all Packers fans and that's cool if we can stay on topic.

Speaking of which, after consideration I am reluctant to buy into Randall even as a slot corner. He spends too much time peeking into the backfield and gets jucked by WR's too often.

I'm here for the jokes.  Plus, I'll say the same **** right to your face (not so much directed at you Thorpe).  BTW, I am right.

BTW BTW, x4, not for pussies.

Last edited by Henry
Henry posted:
PackerPatrick posted:
Floridarob posted:

The political Pot shots in pretty much every thread gets annoying.  And of course they only come from one side. 

It DOES get annoying. But some cannot help themselves by feeling superior in their views. It also assumes that many others agree with them. I believe they don't get the flack back they deserve.

Yet, we are all Packers fans and that's cool if we can stay on topic.

Speaking of which, after consideration I am reluctant to buy into Randall even as a slot corner. He spends too much time peeking into the backfield and gets jucked by WR's too often.

I'm here for the jokes.  Plus, I'll say the same **** right to your face (not so much directed at you Thorpe).  BTW, I am right.

BTW BTW, x4, not for pussies.

Well, I guess I am mistaken. I thought this was a GBP football forum. There are plenty of sites for "comedy", "politics" and "sex". Yet I do admit to enjoying the wit and humor here when referencing the game. Other things...not so much.

I can understand that this is a down time for football news. And, BTW I am MORE right.

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×