Skip to main content

I guess I'll trot this out for the 1,001st time.  The difference between DA and every other developing receiver who's ever been compared to him in GB since then, is that DA showed all that he was capable of in his rookie year.  He was the best WR on the field in the playoff game vs. DAL (with peak whatshisname that didn't catch that ball) in the second half.  He was open a lot more than he got the ball too but AR went other places with it.  Getting separation off the line, breaking ankles on moves, YAC, toughness through the catch and tackle.  He was doing this his rookie year in the divisional round of the playoffs.

He needed to get more consistent with that production, and the ankle killed year #2 of that process.  But there was no wondering what he was capable of after that game and the regular season win vs. NE.  No young receiver in GB has shown that ability since then and if you see it again, it will answer a lot of questions.

@BrainDed posted:

Hawk wasn't over drafted.   He was over signed / extended, multiple times.

The 2006 draft was an interesting one. Not as many busts as a lot of drafts, but also no sure-thing Hall of Famers either (Andrew Whitworth, Devin Hester, and Jahri Evans are the closest).

The Packers have the last player still active from this 2006 draft class - M. Lewis. Unless Jason Peters gets signed by someone, Lewis is the oldest non-QB, non-Specialist in the league by quite a margin.  

The Packers have one of the last two players active from the 2007 draft class - Mason Crosby (along with Nick Folk).

Rodgers is one of the last two guys active from the 2005 draft (Dustin Colquitt).

https://madison.com/sports/foo...f7-7085ebe56480.html

The esteemed Jason Wilde has an article up on Amari Rodgers, including this quote from Gute:

Gutekunst, meanwhile, predicted early in camp that Rodgers’ weight loss β€” he went from playing at 218 pounds last year to weighing 202 at the start of camp β€” and improved conditioning wouldn’t be the only changes visible with him.

β€œThe more opportunities he gets, the more you’re going to see him come out of his shell and really produce,” Gutekunst said. β€œLike a lot of these guys, the more comfortable they are in the offense, and they get in their comfort zone, the more their real talent is going to start to show.

β€œI’ve always felt middle of Year 2, end of Year 3, is when you see most players get to that point where they really know what they’re doing and they’re not thinking anymore. They just let their talents show. Some guys get it faster, and that’s great, but I think that’s usually the norm. As they go and they grow, when they really get that down and they do hit that (point), as an evaluator, you see it and then you know that they’re there and off they go.”

Last edited by Satori
@DH13 posted:

I guess I'll trot this out for the 1,001st time.  The difference between DA and every other developing receiver who's ever been compared to him in GB since then, is that DA showed all that he was capable of in his rookie year.  He was the best WR on the field in the playoff game vs. DAL (with peak whatshisname that didn't catch that ball) in the second half.  He was open a lot more than he got the ball too but AR went other places with it.  Getting separation off the line, breaking ankles on moves, YAC, toughness through the catch and tackle.  He was doing this his rookie year in the divisional round of the playoffs.

He needed to get more consistent with that production, and the ankle killed year #2 of that process.  But there was no wondering what he was capable of after that game and the regular season win vs. NE.  No young receiver in GB has shown that ability since then and if you see it again, it will answer a lot of questions.

The great ones don’t take three years to show flashes.

Have to give credit to Cowhurt when he said, "...When Aaron Rodgers loses Davante Adams you have to develop patience. Christian Watson drops a big-time throw to start the game that would have been a touchdown. He dropped it because he’s a rookie. Then rookie Romeo Doubs had a miscommunication with Aaron early – and what did he do with both of them? Patience? Understanding? No, he ghosted them. Christian Watson didn’t get another look until the fourth quarter. Matt LaFleur had to create reverses for both the rookie wide receivers because Aaron decided β€˜I’m not going to you.’ That’s why AJ Dillon had so many catches, and the tight end had so many catches, Aaron went back to what he’s comfortable with. Eye-rolling, bad body language; once Aaron realized he was trailing, it was the fourth quarter, he was running out of time, and he had no choice, THEN he goes back to the kids..."

Rodgers has rarely gone back to a guy right away when that guy has made a mistake. It even took several years for Rodgers to do that with Adams. Analysts point it out when QBs go right back to a guy who dropped a ball and spout the cliche: "He's showing how much faith he has in him." That helps a WR remain confident.

Rodgers needs to learn the same thing Michael Jordan had to learn: you can be the greatest to play the game but in order to win, you have to elevate your good teammates to become greater players.

Another WR drafted by thePackers in the third round from the great state of South Carolina also struggled in his first two seasons.  He, too, had a HoF QB throwing to him and a HoF WR getting most of the targets. Aside from that HoF WR, the other WRs were dogshit.  And, yet, that third rounder struggled to find the field and was just okay on STs. Took that WR until his third season to have an impact. I think he turned out pretty good for a third rounder until injuries took their toll.

Doubs and Watson.  Badly.

Truth.

Would have been preferable if there had been a Doubs or Watson in the pipeline prior to 2022 rather than throwing 2 rooks into the fray and expecting a veteran-like performance, but here we are.

I, for one, will not blame Watson or Doubs for playing like rookies because Jones, Cobb, Nelson, and Adams all had their fair of "rookie" moments (Jennings not so much) and it is unfair for Rodgers or the fans to expect otherwise.

Moreover, it is apparent to anyone watching that Doubs & Watson possess athleticism that Lazard never had (though he possesses other worthy attributes), Cobb & Watkins have not had in years, and Amari Rodgers can only dream about. Thus, while they might well flounder in their rookie seasons at least there is hope with both of them ... hope that does not exist with the rest of the WRs.

@PackLandVA posted:

Another WR drafted by thePackers in the third round from the great state of South Carolina also struggled in his first two seasons.  He, too, had a HoF QB throwing to him and a HoF WR getting most of the targets. Aside from that HoF WR, the other WRs were dogshit.  And, yet, that third rounder struggled to find the field and was just okay on STs. Took that WR until his third season to have an impact. I think he turned out pretty good for a third rounder until injuries took their toll.

Robert Brooks was awesome and you’re exactly right.  It really felt like #4 didn’t trust him until the 2nd half of the 1994 season his 3rd year.

I know their body types are a little different but Doubs actually sort of reminds me a little bit of Brooks.  Brooks wasn’t a pure speed burner, but whatever he lacked in speed he made up for by running extremely hard down after down and he was always under control when he was running.

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×