Skip to main content

@YATittle posted:

Love Krolls, but I thought it funny that our new TE was so jazzed about all the Culver's, so my comment was a riff on that.

went to krolls last time I was in green bay and did not think they were as good as the 1st time i went there 15 years ago.  Culvers now has a restaurant down the street from me (opened up in January) and this particular one has problems. The burgers are alway cold. I have gone back to Sonic across the street until Culvers works out the kinks. At least Culvers now has coke products. I am not a pepsi fan. 

Two restaurants we normally hit when in Green Bay for a game weekend are Chives and Republic Chophouse.

I wouldn't eat at Culvers if you paid me. I really hope no one embarrassed Packers Nation and suggested Culvers to Simone and Jonathan.

There are Culvers stores in Houston so I'd bet they already know about Butter Burgers.

@Blair Kiel posted:

I think FFWYA is my favorite new poster ever.

It’s not that we wanted him to join….we NEEDED him to join.

This may not end well…but it will be a wild ride.

I acknowledge the welcome, but why would it not "end well"?

I don't think a fan forum is really that serious or deep. If discussing the Packers is a "wild ride" for some, and I make it more exciting for them, then more power to them I suppose.

Thanks again for the welcome.😏

Last edited by FreeFromWhatYouAre

so I read JJ Watt may want to come out of retirement and play for either Green Bay or Pittsburg. If money is right and Watt can pass a physical, he may have a little left in the tank.

Also, Packers need a vet QB to back up Love. I can't believe there have not been any rumors about that. Are they really thinking their QB room is ok the way it is?

Maybe Packers are really thinking about tanking this year as reported by some Chicago writer. It is hilarious those comments are coming from a chicago writer where the bears actually did tank last year. 

@Floridarob posted:

Also, Packers need a vet QB to back up Love. I can't believe there have not been any rumors about that. Are they really thinking their QB room is ok the way it is?

Maybe Packers are really thinking about tanking this year as reported by some Chicago writer. It is hilarious those comments are coming from a chicago writer where the bears actually did tank last year.

The Bears didn't "tank." The Bears just suck. Their fan base claim they tank every year so they don't have to admit they suck. It's an excuse. Watch by week 4 this season, Bears fans will be saying they are tanking for Caleb Williams. Bears fans are pathetic, we know this.

Why pay some crap vet to come in? I'm good with Clifford and Danny backing up J-Love. Clifford as the #2 and Danny Etling on the PS. Not wasting a roster spot and keeping 3 QBs on the 53.

Who would you pay to bring in? Chase Daniel? Nick Foles? I'll pass.

Last edited by FreeFromWhatYouAre

Free...Translation, if Love Sucks or goes down for an injury, tanking for the season should be the mandate? But if Love plays well and he might miss a game or two with the team in contention, you would rather give that experience to a rookie 5th round pick or undrafted free agent who probably is on the team strictly to fill a spot and has no chance of winning the game. 

@Floridarob posted:

Free...Translation, if Love Sucks or goes down for an injury, tanking for the season should be the mandate? But if Love plays well and he might miss a game or two with the team in contention, you would rather give that experience to a rookie 5th round pick or undrafted free agent who probably is on the team strictly to fill a spot and has no chance of winning the game.

"Tanking" isn't an option no matter what. Just not a reality that would ever happen. The end.

Who is this great "vet QB" that you want to bring in and pay?

Last edited by FreeFromWhatYouAre

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×