Skip to main content

quote:
Originally posted by justanotherpackerfan:

Not only that...it took him a whole minute to type that.


He lives in Floriduh. I'm amazed he can even turn on a computer. Amazing what porn can inspire in a person.
quote:
Originally posted by Henry:
quote:
Originally posted by catts:
I thought having a yard full of Live Oak trees would be wonderful...boy was I WRONG!!!!!


Need someone to stuff your bags with leaves and mow your lawn?


Are you volunteering your services Hank?
1:41 am

quote:
Originally posted by Diggr14:
quote:
Originally posted by Geaux-Packers:
Don't most of his picks turn out poorly anyway?



That seems to be the trend. He is the Timberlake of x4.


I see the roaches were early this morning.
quote:
Originally posted by Herschel:
I thought Goalline was a kind and generous lover.

George Webb and a riding crop showed me otherwise. Plus, he drank all the Orange Fanta and left me with Grape.


LOL, I missed this one.
I remember the hire of M3 as why did they hire the OC of two bad teams as well as the QB coach Rhodes hired? I thought how can than this guy run a team when Favre already has most likely controlled him. Not gonna say I was was wrong...'cause I was open....but I guess I never suspected him to be talked about like he has been...
I remember in pre-season of 2006 watching the Packers under their new coach Mike McCarthy getting absolutely destroyed by the Cinncinati Bengals. At that point, I believed the Packers would end up as the worst team in the NFL and that Ted Thompson and Mike McCarthy would both be looked at the way Forrest Gregg, Lindy Infante, etc. were looked at only worse. They finished that 2006 season much better than I thought at 8-8, but I still didn't think much of either of them.

Then came 2007 and I started to think maybe these guys were way better than I realized. After 2008 the doubts crept back in. After the Tampa game in 2009, I once again was convinced the Pack was about to collapse and either Thompson or McCarthy or both would be gone.

Since that point, the Pack has made the playoffs 2 consecutive years, gone 17-7 in the regular season, 4-1 in the playoffs and won its 1st Super Bowl in 13 years. Quite frankly, this season was the Packers greatest accomplishment in my lifetime. The Super Bowl XXXI team may have been better, but this team had far far more adversity to overcome than that team did. That made this all the more special.

To Ted Thompson and Mike McCarthy, you will now have streets in Green Bay named after you (at least you should), and most importantly I WAS WRONG TO HAVE EVER DOUBTED YOU!!! Congratulations on the most amazing Packer season in my lifetime. (When I say "my lifetime", I was conceived during the 1968 season and born just before the 1969 season so I missed all the Lombardi years by a smidgen).
You think about all the frustration that this team and we as fans have put up with over the last several years. From the horrific 2007 playoff loss to the Giants, to Favre's drama queen antics the following year, to a kick in the nads loss to the Cardinals last year (and all of Brent's success in MN), to validation this year- with all the injuries.

People say there's no such thing as karma- but Big Ben sure looked off and Brent came back down to earth this year.

I'm just glad we have Rodgers and TT- two favorite whipping boys of the media over the years. They truly got the last laugh today as did McCarthy- who just never seems to get enough credit.

As much as I admired Mike Holmgren you now have to mention MM in the same sentence- SB Champs.
I was wrong to not wear the same Packer shirt I had been wearing for the last 4 games. Instead I wore my "Ice Bowl" tee-shirt.

However I fixed that at the end of the 3rd quarter, but ditching the tee and putting the other shirt on. And we all know about the first play of the 4th quarter.

I was wrong to mess with the streak.

I would still like to see this person admit he was wrong

quote:
At least now all the Super Bowl hype will be swept away. Even with the injuries, we have so many underperformers that a winning record may prove elusive.
quote:
However I fixed that at the end of the 3rd quarter, but ditching the tee and putting the other shirt on. And we all know about the first play of the 4th quarter.



Unreal ON. I finally caved and peeled #92 at the end of the 3rd quarter. I am doing the same sequence next year when we repeat.

also lost on the big first down to Ward.

But that is not what I am talking about. Many here (present company included) felt Bush shouldn't even be wearing Green and Gold. His play was one of the few bright spots on special teams this year.
I admit that I was wrong about Bush - he can play ST very well. Prior to this season I believed he was completely useless because he was not ball aware and seemed to lack a certain football IQ. He proved me wrong on ST.

now, I give him props for the INT, but I still don't like him playing DB... but he pulled thru well enough to bring Lombardi home so my hat's off to him today.
quote:
Originally posted by pablopackerfan:

Biggest vocals on this thread should be the clowns who claimed this team was going nowhere because they couldn't run the ball or the coaches sucked or TT was an idiot or wtf ever. No one, except for me of course, could have predicted that Bush would have a big play in the Super Bowl. Don't beat yourselves up.


From the guy who makes his living on the board by never criticizing the team and ripping anyone who does. The Packers don't win that Super Bowl if Starks hadn't emerged and we had been stuck with BJax as the primary back.

We just had a great win and are bringing the Lombardi home. Enjoy it.
quote:
Originally posted by CJS:
The Packers don't win that Super Bowl if Starks hadn't emerged and we had been stuck with BJax as the primary back.

I'm gonna have to disagree with this.
I was thinking that the Packers lack of a running game earlier in the year seemed to set them up pretty well for this game. If you gameplan to run on the Steelers you will not have much success, but they can be beaten by the pass. I think the emergence of Starks helped this team get to the Super Bowl but the game against the Steelers played right into the Packers strength. I will say that I think Starks also had a great game last night and is a strong rb and I think next year he is going to be a beast with a full offseason healthy to prepare. The Packers can play any style of game which is what makes them so impresive.
quote:
Originally posted by CJS:
You think we get past the Eagles without that performance by Starks?

If and But... we'll never know. Yet, you are certain they don't win the Super Bowl without Starks. I'll speculate as well. Jackson runs for more than 100 vs the Eagles with the same blocking/holes.
Let me be clear, I'm talking about having Starks from the point that he emerged at the end of the season. Not just the Super Bowl. Starks brought the running game enough respect from opposing defenses to get us there. The game plan to go after the Steelers 3rd and 4th and CB's was the right one. IMO BJax does not duplicate the performance by Starks. He doesn't have the speed or the vision. In fact, I doubt BJax will be on the roster next season. (if there is one) That said - props to Jackson on a solid playoffs, with a couple of key 3rd down catches out of the backfield and a couple of key blitz pick-ups as well.
quote:
Originally posted by CJS:
The Packers don't win that Super Bowl if Starks hadn't emerged and we had been stuck with BJax as the primary back.



This an admit you were rong thread. So just admit this is rong.
I think Grant returns and Starks takes over BJax's role and we won't miss a beat. It might depend on how expensive BJax is and if he's willing to come back as a third string RB. I'm sure TT wouldn't mind saving a draft pick, especially if James Jones decides to move on.

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×