Skip to main content

I believe Belicheat will have the better game plan and the Packers will struggle on both sides of the ball. However even if Jordy and Cobb are minimized on the edges it will free up Lacy for screens and our trio of TEs (Perillo's 1st TD!) will pick up the slack around the hash marks. Turnovers can be deadly but Rodgers protects the ball. If D can have a respectable showing in run game, get pressure on Brady w/out blitz and keep Gronk to a few catches Pack will win it late.    

Last edited by GreenBayLA

I see a close game at first with NE pulling ahead at the end. We have no match for their run game and Gronk. AR throws his first interception at home (a forced ball due to blanket coverage)and NE scores and we cant get back in the game. Eddie runs into the back of our OL because of the NE beef. MM makes a bonehead decision and we pay for it.

 

I see our "Special" teams riding home on the "short bus". Crosby misses a FG and NE make all theirs.

 

I am already looking ahead to the next games because we will be toasted in this one. However, many fans will stay until the end of the game and many of them too drunk to drive.

Last edited by PackerPatrick
Originally Posted by PackerPatrick:

I see a close game at first with NE pulling ahead at the end.

 

I am already looking ahead to the next games because we will be toasted in this one. 

Way to cover all the options. You left out where GB might somehow grease this one out but all in all a pretty wide ranging pinpoint job. 

I believe Rodgers and Brady facing off in this game will cause a splintering in the fabric of space and time, resulting in the creation of multiple parallel universes, each having different outcomes of the game.  My hope is that I am in the timeline in which the Packers win.  It should also be noted that in each of these alternate realities, the Vikings suck.

Originally Posted by ChilliJon:

I'd like someone to give me a reason why they expect more out of New England's defense than Green Bays. Am I missing something???

- I like their rushing defense better than GB's.

- Revis has the ability to cover up the #1 receiver.  The last time we played a team (Seattle) that had a "shut down" CB Arod didn't even bother to throw to that side of the field, which limited the offense.

- GB has nobody to cover Gronkowski down the middle of the field. 

 

Crazy stat. GB gives up 60 rushing yards less per game at home than they do on the road. 167 on the road vs 105 per game at home. Revis is good but this offense isn't the one that faced Seattle. GB had a kid at WR and a kid at C starting on the road in Seattle. Gronk is a matchup nightmare for everyone. 

 

Davante and Quarless are important today and Lacy in the screen game. 

 

This is is going to be a fun game. 

Originally Posted by ChilliJon:

I'd like someone to give me a reason why they expect more out of New England's defense than Green Bays. Am I missing something???

Belichick vs. Dom Capers basically.

 

Moving Clay inside seems like the kind of move Belichick would have made. It was innovative, and very effective. I think that was more McCarthy's doing than Capers, but of course I don't know that.

 

 

Last edited by Fond Du Arrigo

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×