Seattle Week

Good I'm glad you posted that, because that is ancient history now.

 

I'm going to post the teams & QB's the Seahawks have faced since Oct. 6th

 

 

 

Here's the list of QB's

1. Kirk Cousins
2. Tony Romo (Loss)
3. Austin Davis (Loss)
4. Cam Newton
5. Derek Carr
6. Eli Manning
7. Alex Smith (Loss)
8. Drew Stanton
9. CK-7
10. Mark Sanchez
11. CK-7
12. Ryan Lindley
13. Shaun Hill
14. Cam Newton (Playoffs)

Other than Romo & possibly Cam Newton, Any of those QB's "scare" you? 

 

Now, that being said....You can only play who is on your schedule, so it isn't their fault but I firmly believe this Seattle team has not faced ANY team like they're about to face on Sunday. This Packer team is dramatically different than the week #1 version Packer team. 

 

I do not believe the Seahawks defensively are as dominant as they were last year. Yes they're a good team. Yes they're the world champs. Yes they have an excellent home field advantage. So what? Stop being scared of these guys. They can be beat! Plus this Packer team is hungry. 

 

Randall Cobb doesn't have a ring. Watching him play vs. the Cowboys, think he wants a ring? How about Richard Rodgers, or Linsley or Davante Adams!?!? We have a great chance to get into the Super Bowl this season. Let's go out there, to the Pacific Northwest & BEAT THE MAN!!

 

 

 

Disagree. AAMOF, if the Packer defense holds the Seahawks to 20, the Packers will win this game GUARANTEED!

 

Amen to not being scared of these guys. 

 

If the Pack was scared of getting beat again by the Seattle, they would have found a way to lose last Sunday.  GB wants this bad and are going to come ready.  My hope is that the back-ups are just as fired up as the starters because on opening week, the momentum changed as soon as Bulaga went down.

Not Richardson. Too stiff. Wilson would p**n him.

They (Seattle) might be lucky to get 20. I think 16 is more like it.  "Beast Mode" looks to be wearing down whereas Lacy looks stronger as the season goes on.   Guion, Clay and Barrington in the middle is something we did not have in week 1.  Ha Ha was playing in his 1st NFL game and I'm sure was a bit in awe of what he was experiencing. He is an assignment sure better tackling safety now.  These are major changes in our D from week 1. 

 

 Was Davante Adams even active in week 1? 

poon him?

pain him?

pawn him?

peen him?

plan him?

 

 

Sherrod played most of that game at RT and was very bad. I went back to look up what he did that night and it was not pretty. Sherrod if he was any good never recovered from his injury during his Rookie year. The more I think about that game the more I think he really hurt the Packers.

Adams was active. I don't think he was targeted at all though. Boykin was the starting #3.

 

 

 

 

 

Boss, that's why I said 20 or less. They hold Seattle to 20, I like the Packers chances. They give up more than 20 and it makes it that much tougher to win. Can't do that on the road vs that defense

 

I'm thinking 23-20 or 21-17 Pack as of now

 

Main things to worry about are how the run D holds up vs Lynch this time around....how they contain Wilson from torching them with long runs himself or moving out of the pocket and then flipping it to a wide open receiver after the defense breaks down, how the Packers Tackles do vs Seattle's edge rushers on their fast track, and of course, turnovers.

 

Guion was terrible in Week 1 but he was terrible the first few weeks since he missed all of camp with an injury. He didn't really start rounding into form until Week 4 or so. That's another big difference from the first meeting with Seattle

Between the sniveling Texas drivel and the bravado of this decade's Tampa Bay Buccaneers you wouldn't believe there was a game on Sunday.

 

Go in, metaphorical 22 to the back of the head, listen for the crickets across the country.  It's one game, everything before means nothing. 

 

 

 

Ahem. Just like Chuck.

 

 

 

Guion started coming on in Wk5 vs MIN.

 

 

@ cuqui ....And Reggie...

 

Speaking of Woodson. Will never forget the stop he had vs BAL at the goal line. Completely stopped, shifted direction, went air born /parallel to the ground, and got his hand on the ball carrier.

From Dr. Chao

Seahawks injury report

Paul Richardson re-tore his ACL that was first reconstructed in 2012 and will need surgery again. Unfortunately, the Seattle wide receiver will miss the rest of this year and even the beginning of next season is at risk.

 

Max Unger just returned after he was rolled up on in Week 11, suffering a combined left knee MCL and high ankle sprain. By video, another high ankle re-injury to the same side occurred with approximately two minutes left in a two-touchdown victory. The severity is not known, but it may be difficult to return by next week.

 

Byron Maxwell’s play was limited due to shortness of breath. Normally, these symptoms are quite concerning but his is a result of a chest illness from last week. He should be close to 100% by next week.

 

Jeron Johnson dislocated his elbow in the final game of the regular season and my prediction came true that the bye week wasn’t enough time for the back-up safety to return. With another week, he should be close to returning to play with a brace.

 

 

 

Sea****s are thinner at DL this time around- a real lack of bulk in the middle of the DL and 280 lb Michael Bennett isn't lined up vs Bak, he'll be more inside vs Sitton-Linsley-Lang

 

" Here it comes"

 

No Mebane for Seattle this time around as well

 

The media slurpjob is making Seattle seem more imposing than they really are. John Clayton said this years Seattle defense is slightly better than the 2000 Ravens defense. Just hilarious

Understood. I'm saying if the Seahawks score 30, I believe the Packers can still win. Will be more difficult yes, but they can do it.

 

Cuqui, yes, I was saving that for later but Peppers is on a mission. My bear fan friend is fairly perturbed with how well Peppers is playing

 

Don't know why he'd be upset

 

Interesting article about Richard Sherman watching the Packer-Cowboys game with a reporter. He basically says the Packers play calling is pretty predictable, but that Rodgers extending plays is what makes them difficult to play. Sherman definitely has a future in broadcasting.

 

http://mmqb.si.com/2015/01/13/...p-game-nfl-playoffs/

 

http://www.washingtonpost.com/...g-to-the-super-bowl/

Stats of the day:

The Seattle Seahawks rank 20th in the NFL in Sacks with 37 (Green Bay Packers - 9th - 41)

The ‪#‎Seahawks‬ are T-18th with 13 INT's (GB T-7th - 18)

 

Total takeaways: Sea - 21st (23) GB - 8th (27)

 

 

My game watching party noticed how predictable the Packers play calling was Sunday too.

the run/pass guess was almost too easy. 

Lacy/Rodgers and the receivers made many plays on their own.

 

 

also.. Adams had a great game and is a promising young WR, but the KEY to a Super Bowl is a little much. R-E-L-A-X, lets not go overboard. Derrick Mayes looked promising too, and actually had similar #s in 1998. lets see how he progresses

 

bigger key is the OL/DL or Rodgers or Lacy or above the rookie WR having another good game

 

Derrick Mayes? If he had Adams'work ethic he would have been a good one.

I will say it again, Cam Newton had plenty of good opportunities against this Seattle D. Were it not for his inability to read the defense like an NFL QB I think Carolina would have put up another 14-20 points on this D. Seattle made some great plays, but they won't get the same opportunities against GB or even New England. Chancellor and Thomas are the best Safety combo in the NFL, but they have plenty of question marks behind Sherman at CB which makes a huge difference. Kelvin Benjamin dominated Tharold Simon at times and again, if Newton could have actually gotten the ball to him I think he would have had a bigger day. 

 

Agree with all .... 20 pts for Hags is the magical number IMO.

 

So you all sat around saying "run" or "pass".  Yeah, 50/50 chance, that's hard to call.

 

And as far as Adams, it has nothing to do with Adams specifically.  It's the #3 production.  That's the point.

"Kelvin Benjamin dominated Tharold Simon at times and again, if Newton could have actually gotten the ball to him I think he would have had a bigger day."

 

We HAVE to get Simon on that field. Probably takes four wideouts to do so, but Rodgers will pick him apart like an itching scab. Cam was 10 for 10 on him....

Top 5 NFL defenses:

 

(1): Seattle

(2): Detroit

(4): Buffalo

 

Green Bay has played at all three of them this year and lost every one of them.  

 

@ Seattle: GB scored 16 points

@ Detroit:  GB scored 7 points

@ Buffalo: GB scored 13 points

 

Seattle is not unbeatable, but let's cut the BS.  GB needs to play a near perfect game to win at Seattle.  Can they?  Certainly... They could also get blown out of the stadium.  

If the Packers don't make simple boneheaded mistakes, they win.

vs. Detroit  30

 

Convenient to forget. We're nobody's underdogs. We'll play 'em in a parking lot. Add cliche here.

 

There is a significant difference between playing at home and on the road... but whatever makes you feel better about it. 

hopefully that parking lot would be in Green Bay. Seems to help things considerably.

Well, if I want to feel worse about it, I'll listen to you.  I don't care to feel worse about it, though. We root for a very strong team, and believe it- that they will take Seattle to the very brink at worst.

Just ignore Pakrz, its what all the cool kids are doing these days

 

 

actually its around 40/60 with this squad 

From the DAL game:

 

Playing time for the Linebackers 

Clay Matthews: 55 
Sam Barrington: 46 
Mike Neal: 37 
Julius Peppers: 33 
Nick Perry: 21 
A.J. Hawk: 18 
Brad Jones: 8 

 

In week 1 versus Seattle Hawk and Jones combined for 110 snaps.  

Just surprised how Peppers snaps have gone down so much but his productivity is so strong. I had a hard time believing he was out there that little...

Actually its 45/55 but then you probably already predicticated that given your publicly proffered powers of prescience

8 snaps...it's gotta feel like winning the lottery whenever the opposing offense sees 59 out there.

 

8 freaking snaps and he managed to keep a drive alive that led to a Dallas score. I'd say the odds of doing that much damage with that little playing time are way less than 50/50.