Ghost of Lambeau posted:PackLandVA posted:Since Thomas was a second rounder, didn’t EVERY team pass on him, at least once anyway.
True. Other teams passed on Rodgers as well.
Yes but only one team passed on Rodgers twice in the 2005 draft and selected a crappy WR in round 1 of the 2016 (Treadwell) while passing on Michael Thomas.
How bout them ViQueens!!
Thank God!
Schism!
Reports are flu is decimating Viking locker room
More excuses.
And the news keeps getting better!
So both of them are in a similar situation Garrett was in. No contract extension, but the dreaded vote of confidence. Both will be gone at the end of the 2020 season.
Along with Kark. Blow it up!!
No! Don't blow it up! Keep limping along and pushing money out!
YATittle posted:Reports are flu is decimating Viking locker room
I'm certain the #MNrefs will keep them in the game.
The ref for Sundays game has reffed 14 prior Saints games.
The Saints are 13-1 in those games. 
Let the fun begin!!
Chongo posted:And the news keeps getting better!
Loving me some Wilf!
Boris posted:The ref for Sundays game has reffed 14 prior Saints games.
The Saints are 13-1 in those games.
Let the fun begin!!
Add officiating to the purple excuse list!
Saints are due for some favorable calls in the playoffs.
No need to add officiating. They play that card every chance they get.
MNPackman posted:No need to add officiating. They play that card every chance they get.
Was just going to say, That's No.s 1,5,10 & 18 on the the list of 20!
And #20 on the list says....
20) When in doubt, refer to rule #1
PackLandVA posted:Since Thomas was a second rounder, didn’t EVERY team pass on him, at least once anyway.
Including the Saints.
YATittle posted:Reports are flu is decimating Viking locker room
Hopefully they pass it on. Playoff cooties.
Now viking fans are pissed because "anti viking" Joe Buck is calling the game. Ever the victims.....
And now complaining that Erin Andrew's is wearing a black blazer with gold buttons, showing a "Saints bias".
Unread post by sh1mmyya » Sun Jan 05, 2020 12:55 pm
Talk about some of the all-time backfires in this thread. We’re gonna have to bring our a game to win next week. I want no part of the queens at home. No win situation. If we win, we were supposed to win. If we lose....I can’t even bear the thought of it.
TouchdownWhitewaterJesus posted:Talk about some of the all-time backfires in this thread. We’re gonna have to bring our a game to win next week. I want no part of the queens at home. No win situation. If we win, we were supposed to win. If we lose....I can’t even bear the thought of it.
TouchdownWhitewaterJesus posted:Talk about some of the all-time backfires in this thread. We’re gonna have to bring our a game to win next week. I want no part of the queens at home. No win situation. If we win, we were supposed to win. If we lose....I can’t even bear the thought of it.
Handle your business next week out west and we'll see you in Green Bay :-)
Saints and Packers seemed to follow the same blueprint for years with a heavy reliance on offense.
Good thing the Packers have a new blueprint. Z flinging the 1st round C around again would be a thing of beauty.
Fuck off, jaymo. Real cocky all of a sudden, aren't you?
Going to be a fun week.
MNPackman posted:Fuck off, jaymo. Real cocky all of a sudden, aren't you?
All of a sudden?
Pretty sure Zimmer and Spielman saved their jobs yesterday. Rejoice!
Shit, I'm hoping Minny wins next week too... That will set up a real nice beat down one week later in Lambeau.
Already beat them twice. No need to prove it a 3rd time. NFL doesn't want that either.
No, the question is, can the Packers go into SF & beat the vaunted, #1 seeded Niners after getting curb stomped there in November?
I think that's what the NFL wants....unless they want to see another Niner/Seahawk classic, then the refs will try to completely hose the Packers in Lambeau.
You mean the NFL has turned into the NBA?
Boris posted:Already beat them twice. No need to prove it a 3rd time. NFL doesn't want that either.
No, the question is, can the Packers go into SF & beat the vaunted, #1 seeded Niners after getting curb stomped there in November?
I think that's what the NFL wants....unless they want to see another Niner/Seahawk classic, then the refs will try to completely hose the Packers in Lambeau.
Sorry boss, but now you're starting to sound like a viking fan.......
Yeah well....Fail Mary has jaded me
I understand......
Boris posted:Already beat them twice. No need to prove it a 3rd time. NFL doesn't want that either.
No, the question is, can the Packers go into SF & beat the vaunted, #1 seeded Niners after getting curb stomped there in November?
I think that's what the NFL wants....unless they want to see another Niner/Seahawk classic, then the refs will try to completely hose the Packers in Lambeau.
I think the NFL wanted the vikings in the Super Bowl the year the game was played in Minneapolis. Zimmy and crew came up short with Philly, that year, and added to the misery of the people who call themselves vikings fans. I do not get that vibe this year. I think the NFL wants the two teams from the two biggest TV markets left, in the big game. Money, money money--Money! Since the Patriots are done and the NY teams and the LA area teams are not in the playoffs, that would leave Baltimore, SF, Houston or Seattle, as their choices for the Super Bowl match up. If GB makes it to the Championship, it throws the NFL's plans off. I say, GO PACK, GO!
The league would not mind to see a SF/Seattle rematch. Not at all.
Not having the Patriots and Brady is a big deal.
The Packers still draw but aren’t as sexy as they used to be.
Most casual viewers want to see star players rather than matchups. Mahomes and Wilson fit that bill.
By the way, if you think officials and the league aren’t steering or influencing results you aren’t watching. Sports gambling isn’t limited to the NBA folks.
