Skip to main content

more piling on , even if its been posted :

"On Thursday, the Chicago Bears traded everything including the kitchen sink to the San Francisco 49ers to move up one spot to select UNC QB Mitch Trubisky with the second overall pick in the 2017 draft.

When Trubisky took a visit to Jon Gruden’s QB Camp a few weeks ago, he had no clue when it came to the concept of a hard count.  It was rather embarrassing."

 

totalprosports.com/2017/04/27/bears-drafted-a-qb-who-doesnt-know-what-a-hard-count-is-with-the-2-overall-pick-video

 

 

-

 

 

Mitchell Trubisky's grade is an 89 (Todd McShay). The average grade of No. 1 overall QBs over the last 10 drafts is a 96.

 

 

Last edited by WolfPack
Henry posted:
PackerJoe posted:

He may be admitting that the defensive backfield wasn't worth a crap last year but anybody who was paying attention would already know that.

 

I'm constantly amazed that the loss of Sam Shields just doesn't register with people.   Your #1 CB.  Yeah, that's a big loss.

Yeah but a former basketball star and a one-ankled guy didn't turn into Woodson/Barber overnight. clearly TT is washed up.

GreenNgoldBlood posted:

Pathetic...Montravius Adams-DT Auburn. Glad the Packers think they have plenty of RB's.

Hey, psst, you have a little urine on your pants.  Did you see a colossal breakdown at RB when Monty stepped up?  And he made that transition on the fly.  Glad to see you think the Packers have nothing at RB.  Because a RB that can run tough in a committee setup and has WR skills sure does suck.

Henry posted:
GreenNgoldBlood posted:

Pathetic...Montravius Adams-DT Auburn. Glad the Packers think they have plenty of RB's.

Hey, psst, you have a little urine on your pants.  Did you see a colossal breakdown at RB when Monty stepped up?  And he made that transition on the fly.  Glad to see you think the Packers have nothing at RB.  Because a RB that can run tough in a committee setup and has WR skills sure does suck.

Pretty sure you need some guys back there at least behind Monty..All they have is Michael. Monty at best a 15 carry a game guy and that may be stretching it.

Hungry5 posted:

Which RB would you have chosen?

Well, they have had chances to take..Cook, Kamara, Hunt, Foreman, Mixon and passed on them all. Sorry, Monty is not a 20-25 carry back. How DEADLY would this offense be if they had a back that could carry 20-25+ times a game, and put up consistent 100 yd games, to go with Arodg and the passing game?? They'd score 50+ points a game.

tsr86free posted:

Perine would make sense with the first pick tomorrow. Very slow, but immense power. Liked his highlight video posted above. 

I like him at 4.1 if he makes it there.  He breaks so many tackles.  Granted it's partly cuz he has to cuz he's slow but it's interesting to see given so many RB highlight films are just them hitting a wide open hole and never being touched.  At least you know he's can shed tacklers.

GreenNgoldBlood posted:
Hungry5 posted:

Which RB would you have chosen?

Well, they have had chances to take..Cook, Kamara, Hunt, Foreman, Mixon and passed on them all. Sorry, Monty is not a 20-25 carry back. How DEADLY would this offense be if they had a back that could carry 20-25+ times a game, and put up consistent 100 yd games, to go with Arodg and the passing game?? They'd score 50+ points a game.

How old are you?   I'm guessing 22.  How many dominate offensive teams have made it to/won the Superbowl without some kind of complimenting defense?  This offense already has the capability to hang 35-40 points on a team.  We joke about it but you actually think trying to constantly out shoot the other team equates to a championship?  

Last edited by Henry

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×